Vol. 96

Front:[PDF file] Back:[PDF file]
Latest Volume
All Volumes
All Issues
2009-09-07

Wiener Filtering Applied to Magnetic Near Field Scanning

By Cecile Labarre, Francois Costa, and C. Gautier
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 96, 63-82, 2009
doi:10.2528/PIER09061904

Abstract

Magnetic near-field scanning is a growing-up technique in power electronics. However, due to the large size of the devices, a trade-off is necessary to find between the spatial resolution of the field and the measurement time, this one is often unsatisfying. In this paper, we propose to improve drastically this trade-off by using a signal-processing technique (Wiener filtering) which allows a large scanning step (short scanning duration) while keeping an accurate spatial resolution of the magnetic field. This technique is adapted to the magnetic near-field probing, as described in the paper. Our experiments show that a factor 25 can be gained on the product "resolution-×-duration" of the measurements.

Citation


Cecile Labarre, Francois Costa, and C. Gautier, "Wiener Filtering Applied to Magnetic Near Field Scanning," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 96, 63-82, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09061904
http://www.jpier.org/PIER/pier.php?paper=09061904

References


    1. Harada, T., N. Masuda, and M. Yamaguchi, "Near-field magnetic measurements and their application to EMC of digital equipment," IEICE Transactions on Electronics, Vol. E89-C, 9-15, 2006.
    doi:10.1093/ietele/e89-c.1.9

    2. Baudry, D., A. Louis, and B. Mazari, "Characterization of the open-ended coaxial probe used for near-field measurements in EMC applications," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 60, 311-333, 2006.

    3. Hernando, M., A. Fernandez, F. Arias, F. Rodriguez, and M. Las-Heras, "Radiated noise measurement system to estimate the EMI regulations compliance of a power electronic circuit," Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2544-2549, 2007.

    4. Shi, J., M. A. Cracraft, K. Slattery, M. Yamaguchi, and R. E. DuBroff, "Calibration and compensation of near-field scan measurements," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 47, No. 3, 642-650, 2005.
    doi:10.1109/TEMC.2005.853165

    5. Shi, J., R. E. DuBroff, M. Yamaguchi, and K. Slattery, "Frequency domain compensation of probe induced disturbances in near field measurements," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibility EMC'04, 165-168, Sendai, Japan, 2004.

    6. Tankielun, A., Data-post-processing and Hardware Architecture of Electromagnetic Near-field Scanner, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2007.

    7. Hirayama, H. and J. Kami, "Resolution improvement of E-field probe using a signal processing technique," Proc. Korea-Japan AP/EM/EMT Joint Conference, 206-209, Taejon, Korea, 2001.

    8. Gonzales, R. C., Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993.

    9. Michailovich, O. and A. Tannenbaum, "Blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound images: A parametric inverse filtering approach," IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 16, No. 12, 3005-3019, 2007.
    doi:10.1109/TIP.2007.910179

    10. Nicolson, A. M., "Forming the fast Fourier transform of a step response in time-domain metrology," Electronics Lett., Vol. 9, 317-318, 1973.
    doi:10.1049/el:19730228

    11. Liu, B., L. Beghou, L. Pichon, and F. Costa, "Adaptive geneticv algorithm based source identification with near-field scanning method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 9, 215-230, 2008.
    doi:10.2528/PIERB08070904

    12. Ayestaran, R. G. and F. Las-Heras, "Near field to far field transformation using neural networks and source reconstruction," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 20, No. 15, 2201-2213, 2006.
    doi:10.1163/156939306779322594