Progress In Electromagnetics Research
ISSN: 1070-4698, E-ISSN: 1559-8985
Home | Search | Notification | Authors | Submission | PIERS Home | EM Academy
Home > Vol. 104 > pp. 221-237


By H. T. Teng, H.-T. Ewe, and S. L. Tan

Full Article PDF (512 KB)

Multifractal dimensions Dq for real q are a more general parameter than the fractal dimension in describing geometrical properties. It has been shown that the four multifractal dimensions D-1, D0, D1 and D2 are able to extract different surface information of SAR images. In this paper, we investigate the dimension properties of multifractal dimensions. For land use classification where the textural information on the surface is important, it is necessary to look into the properties of multifractal dimensions with the geometrical properties of terrain. In order to extract the surface information from SAR images, the optimum number of multifractal dimensions to be used in the classification process is considered. To address the suitability of these parameters, these parameters are applied on a multi-band SAR image with regions of different textural information and the results are studied. The abilities of multifractal dimensions in extracting information for different land use classes are considered. In general, although multifractal dimensions provide additional information about the land use classes, there is no clear relation among the land use classes, image polarization and multifractal dimensions.

H. T. Teng, H.-T. Ewe, and S. L. Tan, "Multifractal Dimension and its Geometrical Terrain Properties for Classification of Multi-Band Multi-Polarized SAR Image," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 104, 221-237, 2010.

1. Pentland, A. P., "Fractal-based description of natural scenes," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 6, No. 6, 661-674, 1984.

2. Chan, K. L., "Fractal based texture analysis," Singapore ICCS/ISITA'92, Vol. 1, 102-106, 1992.

3. Ewe, H. T., W. C. Au, R. T. Shin, and J. A. Kong, "Classification of SAR images using a fractal approach," PIERS Proceedings, 493, Los Angeles, USA, 1993.

4. Keller, J. M., S. Chen, and R. M. Crownover, "Texture description and segmentation through fractal geometry," Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Vol. 45, 50-166, 1989.

5. Marazzi, A., P. Gamba, A. Mecocci, and E. Costamagna, "A mixed fractal/wavelet based approach for characterization of textured remote sensing images," IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, IGARSS'97, Vol. 2, 655-657, 1997.

6. Evertsz, C. J. G. and B. B. Mandelbrot, "Multifractal measures," Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science, H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jurgens, and D. Saupe (eds.), 849-881, Springer Verlag, New York, 1992.

7. Falconer, K., Fractal Geometry, John Wiley, 1990.

8. Yeo, T. S. and G. Du, "A multifractal approach for auto- segmentation of SAR images," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, IGARSS 2001, Vol. 5, 2301-2303, 2001.

9. Teng, H. T., H. T. Ewe, and S. L. Tan, "A multifractal approach for classification of SAR image," Proceedings Third National Microwave Remote Sensing Seminar, MACRES, Kuala Lumpur, Sep. 28, 2004.

10. Peitgen, H.-O., H. Jurgens, and D. Saupe, Chaos and Fractals --- New Frontiers of Science, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.

© Copyright 2014 EMW Publishing. All Rights Reserved