PIER B
 
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B
ISSN: 1937-6472
Home | Search | Notification | Authors | Submission | PIERS Home | EM Academy
Home > Vol. 26 > pp. 257-290

MODE STIRRED REVERBERATION CHAMBER (MSRC): A LARGE AND EFFICIENT TOOL TO LEAD HIGH FREQUENCY BIOELECTROMAGNETIC IN VITRO EXPERIMENTATION

By S. Lallechere, S. Girard, D. Roux, P. Bonnet, F. Paladian, and A. Vian

Full Article PDF (1,291 KB)

Abstract:
An important aspect of the studies undertaken in bioelectromagnetism relates to the choice of the exposure facility, the characteristics of a real electromagnetic environment are far more complex compared to the one plane wave irradiation set-up used in the majority of bioelectromagnetic studies. Moreover biological requirements should represent the starting point in the design of an in vitro exposure system. Indeed it is important to avoid altering the electromagnetic properties of the exposure system in the presence of the biological equipments. Related to these two essential points, this article contributes to show the advantages of a Mode Stirred Reverberation Chamber (MSRC) to guarantee a controlled electromagnetic environment around biological material for in vitro experimentation. An example of irradiation of in vitro human skin cells cultures will be considered to illustrate this paper. In order to show that the biological conditions and physical requirements for in vitro experiments are checked, two aspects are described. Firstly the characterization of the electromagnetic field generated around the biological system (both equipments and cultures) is achieved. Secondly the analysis of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) inside the biological medium is evaluated both numerically and experimentally. Initially, the statistical properties of fields inside the MSRC were checked with or without biological devices in order to verify their electromagnetic transparency with respect to the reverberating properties of the electromagnetic environment (inside MSRC) and the good agreement of the experimental electromagnetic power distribution with the theoretical one. The second part of this work corresponds to the determination of the SAR distribution. The computation of electromagnetic energy absorbed by biological medium (SAR) was based upon Finite Difference in Time Domain (FDTD) technique. A numerical analogy was achieved between MSRC behavior and a free-space finite sum of random plane waves. Simulations are able to provide both an estimation of SAR distribution inside each biological culture dish and a computation of the coupling effects between dishes. Relying on the previous conclusions, temperature measurements were led to evaluate the experimental SAR levels and its time variations inside the MSRC. Two high-frequency (900 MHz) environments were considered: a 10 minutes exposure with standard field amplitude inside the biological incubator of 7.87 V/m and 30 minutes with 41V/m (SAR ranged from 2.6 mW/kg to 73 mW/kg, mean values). Numerical and experimental results prove the ability of MSRC to provide a large and efficient tool to achieve bioelectromagnetic experiments at high frequencies.

Citation:
S. Lallechere, S. Girard, D. Roux, P. Bonnet, F. Paladian, and A. Vian, "Mode Stirred Reverberation Chamber (Msrc): a Large and Efficient Tool to Lead High Frequency Bioelectromagnetic in Vitro Experimentation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 26, 257-290, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERB10062313

References:
1. Burkhardt, M., K. Pokovic, M. Gnos, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, "Numerical and experimental dosimetry of Petri dish exposure setups," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 17, 483-493, 1996.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:6<483::AID-BEM8>3.0.CO;2-#

2. Paffi, A., R. Pinto, M. Liberti, F. Apollonio, G. A. Lovisolo, and G. D'Inzeo, "Review of exposure setups for biological experiments in the radiofrequency range specifications and emerging trends," URSI General Assembly, 2008.

3. Nikoloski, N., J. Frohlich, T. Samaras, J. Schuderer, and N. Kuster, "Reevaluation and improved design of the TEM cell in vitro exposure unit for replication studies," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 26, 215-224, 2005.
doi:10.1002/bem.20067

4. Duranti, G., A. Rossi, N. Rosato, and G. Fazio, "In vitro evaluation of biological effects on human keratinocytes exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic field," The Environmentalist, Vol. 25, 113-119, 2005.
doi:10.1007/s10669-005-4273-y

5. Jorge-Mora, T., M. Alvarez-Folgueiras, J. Leiro, F. J. Jorge-Barreiro, F. J. Ares-Pena, and E. Lopez-Martin, "Exposure to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation provokes cerebral changes in induction of HSP-90/heat shock protein in rat," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 100, 351-379, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER09102804

6. Penafiel, L. M., T. Litovitz, D. Krause, A. Desta, and J. M. Mullins, "Role of modulation on the effect of microwaves on ornithine decarboxilase activity in L929 cell," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 18, 132-141, 1997.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1997)18:2<132::AID-BEM6>3.0.CO;2-3

7. Laval, L., P. Lévêque, and B. Jecko, "A new in vitro exposure device for the mobile frequency of 900 MHz," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 20, 1-9, 1999.

8. De Gannes, F. P., M. Taxile, S. Duleu, A. Hurtier, E. Haro, M. Geffard, G. Ruffié, B. Billaudel, P. Lévêque, P. Dufour, I. Lagroye, and B. Veyret, "A confirmation study of russian and ukrainian data on effects of 2450MHz microwave exposure on immunological processes and teratology in rats," Radiation Research, Vol. 172, No. 5, 617-624, November 2009.
doi:10.1667/RR1541.1

9. Iyama, T., H. Ebara, Y. Tarusawa, S. Uebayashi, M. Sekijima, T. Nojima, and J. Miyakoshi, "Large scale in vitro experiment system for 2 GHz exposure," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 25, 599-606, 2004.
doi:10.1002/bem.20038

10. International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection, "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)," Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4, 494-522, 1998.

11. Sharma, V., H. Singh, R. Kohli, and D. Batish, "Mobile phone radiation inhibits vigna radiata (mung bean) root growth by inducing oxidative stress," Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 407, 5543-5547, 2009.
doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.006

12. Ladbury, J., P. Wilson, G. Koepke, and T. Lammers, "Reverberation chamber: An evaluation for possible use as a RF exposure system for animal studies," Bioelectromagnetics Soc. (BEMS) 25th Annu. Meeting, 150-151, Maui, HI, June 22--27, 2003.

13. Biagi, P. F., L. Castellana, T. Maggipinto, G. Maggipinto, T. Ligonzo, L. Schiavulli, and D. Loiacono, "A reverberation chamber to investigate the possible effects of `in vivo' exposure of rats to 1.8 GHz electromagnetic fields: A preliminary study," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 94, 133-152, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09061006

14. Berdinas-Torres, V. J., Exposure's systems and dosimetry of large-scale in vivo studies, Doctoral Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 2007.

15. Wu, T., A. Hadjem, M. F. Wong, A. Gati, O. Picon, and J. Wiart, "Whole-body new-born and yound rats' exposure assessment in a reverberating chamber operating at 2.4 GHz," Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 55, 1619-1630, 2010.
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/6/006

16., "Mise à jour de l'expertise relative aux radiofréquences," Rapport d'expertise Collective Afsset, Groupe de Travail Radiofréquences, Saisine, n2007/007, October 2009.

17. Beaubois, E., S. Girard, S. Lalléchère, E. Davies, F. Paladian, P. Bonnet, G. Ledoigt, and A. Vian, "Intercellular communication in plants: Evidence for two rapidly systemic signals generated in response to electromagnetic field stimulation in tomato," Plant Cell and Environment, Vol. 30, 834-844, 2007.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01669.x

18. Vian, A., D. Roux, S. Girard, P. Bonnet, F. Paladian, E. Davies, and G. Ledoigt, "Microwave irradiation affects gene expression in plants," Plant Signaling and Behavior, Vol. 1, No. 2, 67-69, 2006.
doi:10.4161/psb.1.2.2434

19. Roux, D., A. Vian, S. Girard, P. Bonnet, F. Paladian, E. Davies, and G. Ledoigt, "Electromagnetic fields (900 MHz) evoke consistent molecular responses in tomato plants," Phys. Plant, Vol. 128, 283-288, 2006.
doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00740.x

20. Roux, D., A. Vian, S. Girard, P. Bonnet, F. Paladian, E. Davies, and G. Ledoigt, "High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5V.m-1) electromagnetic field: A genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato," Planta, Vol. 227, 883-891, 2008.
doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0664-2

21., "Reverberation chamber test method," IEC Draft 61000-4-21, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Part 4: Testing and Measure Techniques, Section 21, 2000.

22., "Radio frequency susceptibility (radiated and conducted)," RTCA/DO-160D Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment, Draft #8, Section 20, 2000.

23. Corona, P., J. Ladbury, and G. Latmiral, "Reverberation-chamber research --- Then and now: A review of early work and comparison with current understanding," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 44, 87-94, 2002.
doi:10.1109/15.990714

24. D'Ambrosio, G., F. Di Meglio, and G. Ferrara, "Multimode timevarying enclosures for exposure and dosimetry in bioelectro-magnetic experiments," Alta Frequenza, Vol. 49, 89-94, 1980.

25. Corona, P., G. Ferrara, and M. Migliaccio, "Reverberation chambers as sources of stochastic electromagnetic fields," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 38, No. 3, 348-356, August 1996.
doi:10.1109/15.536065

26. Bruns, C., Three-dimensional simulation and experimental verification of a reverberation chamber, Doctoral Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 2005.

27. Lunden, O. and M. Backstrom, "Stirrer efficiency in FOA reverberation chambers. Evaluation of correlation coefficients and chi-squared tests," IEEE International and Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 11-16, Washington, 2000.

28. Dawson, J. F., "Reverberation (mode-stirred) chambers for electromagnetic compatibility," EMC and Compliance, Vol. 46, 30-28, 2003.

29. Holloway, C., D. Hill, J. Ladbury, P. Wilson, G. Koepke, and J. Coder, "On the use of reverberation chambers to simulate a Rician radio environment for the testing of wireless devices," IEEE Trans. on Ant. and Prop., Vol. 54, No. 11, November 2006.

30. Hill, D. A., "Plane wave integral representation for fields in reverberation chambers," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 40, No. 3, 209-217, 1998.
doi:10.1109/15.709418

31., "Micropuce à ADN pour études physiologiques," Grant from the French Foundation for Health and Radiofrequencies (Fondation Santé et Radiofréquences), 2009, http://www.sante-radiofrequences.org..

32. Lovisolo, G. A., F. Apollonio, L. Ardoino, M. Liberti, V. Lopresto, C. Marino, A. Paffi, and R. Pinto, "Specifications of in vitro exposure setups in the radio-frequency range," Radio Science Bulletin, No. 331, 21-30, December 2009.

33. Massey, F. J., "The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 46, 68-78, March 1951.
doi:10.2307/2280095

34. Taflove, A. and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics, 2nd Ed., Artech House, 2000.

35. Dosimétrie de systèmes d'exposition pour l'étude in vivo ou in vitro des interactions des ondes électromagnétiques décimétriques et centimétriques avec le vivant, Doctoral Thesis, Limoges University, 2007.

36. Bonnet, P., F. Diouf, C. Chauvière, S. Lalléchère, M. Fogli, and F. Paladian, "Numerical simulation of a reverberation chamber with a stochastic collocation method," Compte Rendu de l'Académie des Sciences/Physique, 2009, doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2008.12.001..

37. Ticaud, N., C. Merla, D. Arnaud-Cormos, and P. Lévêque, "Caractérisations numérique et expérimentale d'un système pour l'exposition en temps réel de neurones aux ondes radiofréquence," 15th International Symposium CEM210, 2Limoges, France, April 2010.


© Copyright 2010 EMW Publishing. All Rights Reserved