PIER B
 
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B
ISSN: 1937-6472
Home | Search | Notification | Authors | Submission | PIERS Home | EM Academy
Home > Vol. 31 > pp. 357-379

SMART ELECTROMAGNETIC SIMULATIONS: GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS TECHNIQUE

By H. R. E. H. Bouchekara, G. Dahman, and M. Nahas

Full Article PDF (531 KB)

Abstract:
Electromagnetic design problems usually involve a large number of varying parameters. A designer can use different kinds of models in order to achieve optimum design. Some models, e.g., finite-element model, can be very precise: however, it requires large computational costs (i.e., CPU time). Therefore, the designer should use a screening process to reduce the number of parameters in order to reduce the required computational time. In this paper, using the Design of Experiments (DOE) approach to reduce the number of parameters is explored. The benefits of this technique are tremendous. For example, once researchers realize how much insight and information can be obtained in a relatively short amount of time from a well-designed experiment, DOE would become a regular part of the way they approach their simulation projects. The main objective of this paper is to apply the DOE technique to electromagnetic simulations of different systems and to explore its effectiveness on a new field, namely the magnetic refrigeration systems. The methodology of the DOE is presented to assess the effects of the different variables and their interaction involved in electromagnetic simulations design and optimization processes.

Citation:
H. R. E. H. Bouchekara, G. Dahman, and M. Nahas, "Smart Electromagnetic Simulations: Guidelines for Design of Experiments Technique," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 31, 357-379, 2011.
doi:10.2528/PIERB11052104

References:
1. Mohammed, O. A., D. A. Lowther, M. H. Lean, and B. Alhalabi, "On the creation of a generalized design optimization environment for electromagnetic devices," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 37, No. 5, 3562-3565, 2001.
doi:10.1109/20.952662

2. Gang, L., G. Y. Yang, K. R. Shao, Y. Guo, J. Zhu, and J. D. Lavers, "Electromagnetic device design based on RBF models and two new sequential optimization strategies," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 46, No. 8, 3181-3184, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2010.2043717

3. Carcangiu, S., A. Fanni, A. Mereu, and A. Montisci, "Grid-enabled tabu search for electromagnetic optimization problems," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 46, No. 8, 3265-3268, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2010.2045487

4. Nikolova, N. K., Solving design and inverse-imaging problems through electromagnetic simulation , 17th International Conference on Microwaves, Radar and Wireless Communications MIKON, No. 1--8, 19-21, 2008.

5. Sanchez, S. M., "Work smarter, not harder: Guidelines for designing simulation experiments," Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 4-7, 2005.

6. Altayib, K. and A. Ali, "Improvement for alignment process of automotive assembly plant using simulation and design of experiments ," International Journal of Experimental Design and Process Optimisation , Vol. 2, No. 2, 145-160, 2011.
doi:10.1504/IJEDPO.2011.040264

7. Garcia, S., A. Fernandez, J. Luengo, and F. Herrera, "Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: Experimental analysis of power," Information Sciences, Vol. 180, No. 10, 2044-2064, 2010.
doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.12.010

8. Kutlea, L., N. Pavlovica, M. Dorotica, I. Zadroa, M. Kapustica, and B. Halassy, "Robustness testing of live attenuated rubella vaccine potency assay using fractional factorial design of experiments ," Vaccine, Vol. 28, No. 33, 5497-5502, 2010.
doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.111

9. Kleijnen, J. P. C., S. M. Sanchez, T. W. Lucas, and T. M. Cioppa, "State-of-the-art review: A user's guide to the brave new world of designing simulation experiments," Journal on Computing, Vol. 17, No. 3, 263-289, 2005.

10. Uy, M. and J. K. Telford, "Optimization by design of experiment techniques," IEEE Aerospace Conference, No. 1--10, 7-14, 2009.

11. Pillet, M., "Les plans d'experiences par la methode taguchi," Les Editions d'Organisation, 1997.

12. Costa, M. C., Optimisation de dispositifs electromagnetiques dans un contexte d'analyse par la methode des elements finis, Ph.D. Thesis National Polytechnic Institute of Grenoble, 2001.

13. Demonsant, J., "Comprendre et mener des plans d'experiences," Afnor, ISBN 2-124-75032-1, 1996.

14. Hong, S. C., S. J. Kim, E. J. Hahn, S. Park, and C. S. Kim, , "Magnetic refrigeration properties of La0:8 Ca0:2 Mn0:9957Fe57 ," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2565-2568, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2009.2018888

15. Bruck, E., et al., "Magnetic refrigeration-towards room-temperature applications," Physica B: Condensed Matter, Vol. 327, No. 2--4, 431-437, 2003.
doi:10.1016/S0921-4526(02)01769-6

16. Dong, A. and X. Lu, "A new permanent magnet system for rotating magnetic refrigerator," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 20, No. 3, 834-837, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TASC.2010.2040257


© Copyright 2010 EMW Publishing. All Rights Reserved