Vol. 42
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2012-07-16
Least Squares Filtering Algorithm for Reactive Near Field Probe Correction
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 42, 225-243, 2012
Abstract
The probe correction technique applied to reactive near field characterization is based on a deconvolution process. However, the classical deconvolution based on an inverse Fourier transform has a restrictive limitation. It is based on the use of noiseless measurement data. Consequently, measurement noise makes the result obtained by the classical deconvolution based technique inefficient and requires an extremely low noise measurement facility. In this paper, a method to improve the probe correction stability when using corrupted measurement data is presented. The proposed constrained least squares filtering algorithm (CLSF) uses an inverse filtering approach that takes into account the statistical characteristics of the measurement noise. Computations data with electromagnetic software of two different structures validate this method and illustrate its reliability.
Citation
Mohammed Anisse Moutaouekkil, Abdelhak Ziyyat, Mohammed Serhir, and Dominique Picard, "Least Squares Filtering Algorithm for Reactive Near Field Probe Correction," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 42, 225-243, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12060404
References

1. Slater, D., Near-Field Antenna Measurements, Artech House, Boston, London, 1991.

2. Slattery, K., J. W. Neal, and W. Cui, "Near-field measurements of VLSI devices," IEEE Trans. on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 41, No. 4, 374-384, November 1999.
doi:10.1109/15.809825

3. Tankielun, A., P. Kralicek, U. Keller, E. Sicard, and B. Vrignon, "Influence of core optimisation and activity for electromagnetic near-field and conducted emissions of CESAME test chip," 4th International Workshop on Electromagnetic Compatibility of Integrated Circuits, Vol. 4, 95-100, 2004.

4. Las-Heras, F. and T. K. Sarkar, "Integrated Circuits for source reconstruction and NF-FF transformation using amplitude-only data," IEEE International Symposium on EMC, Vol. 50, No. 4, 500-510, 2002.

5. Sarkar, T. K. and F. Las-Heras, "An iterative spherical near-field to far-field emissions and source reconstruction using the equivalent current approach," IEEE International Symposium on EMC, Vol. 1, 395-398, 2001.

6. Riah, Z., D. Baudry, M. Kadi, A. Louis, and B. Mazari, "Post-processing of electric field measurements to calibrate a near-field dipole probe," IET Sci. Meas. Technol, Vol. 5, No. 2, 29-36, 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-smt.2010.0031

7. Tankielun, A., U. Keller, W. John, and H. Garbe, "Complex deconvolution for improvement of standard monopole near-field measurement results," 16th Int. Zurich Symp., EMC200, Zurich, 2005.

8. Shi, J., M. A. Cracraft, K. P. Slattery, M. Yamaguchi, and R. E. DuBroff, "Calibration and compensation of near-field scan measurements," IEEE Journal on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 47, No. 3, 642-650, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2005.853165

9. Bouchlouk, L., "Conception et validation de sondes pour les mesures en champ proches,", Ph.D. Thesis, University Pris sud XI, 2006.

10. Gonzales, R. C. and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, PAYS, 1993.

11. Petrou, M. and P. Bostogianni, Image Processing: The Fundamentals, Wiley, UK, 1999.

12. Yeoh, W. S. and C. Zhang, "Constrained least squares filtering algorithm for ultrasound image deconvolution," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 10, 2001-2007, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.881781

13. Schneider, B., "Plane waves in FDTD simulations and a nearly perfect total-field/scattered-field boundary," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 52, No. 12, 3280-3287, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2004.836403

14. CST, GmbH, "From design to reality," Microwave Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2004.