PIER Letters
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters
ISSN: 1937-6480
Home | Search | Notification | Authors | Submission | PIERS Home | EM Academy
Home > Vol. 39 > pp. 141-149


By Y. S. Meng and Y. Shan

Full Article PDF (173 KB)

This paper presents a comparative study on practical evaluation of measurement uncertainty for complex-valued RF and microwave quantities in polar coordinate. The measurement uncertainty is first evaluated in rectangular coordinate to avoid the biased effect, and then transformed into the desired polar coordinate. In this work, uncertainty coordinate transformation from rectangular coordinate to polar coordinate is focused and performed in two ways; the law of propagation of uncertainty and the coordinate rotation. Their performances are compared through practical evaluations and simulations, and found to be highly consistent when the uncertainty region is distant from the origin of a complex plane.

Y. S. Meng and Y. Shan, "Comparative Evaluation of Uncertainty Transformation for Measuring Complex-Valued Quantities," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 39, 141-149, 2013.

1. Wang, Z., W. Che, and L. Zhou, "Uncertainty analysis of the rational function model used in the complex permittivity measurement of biological tissues using PMCT probes within a wide microwave frequency band," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 90, 137-150, 2009.

2. Azpurua, M. A., C. Tremola, and E. Paez, "Comparison of the gum and monte carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in electromagnetic compatibility testing," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 34, 125-144, 2011.

3. Shan, Y., Y. S. Meng, and Z. Lin, "Generic model and case studies of microwave power sensor calibration using direct comparison transfer," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 62, 2013, DOI:10.1109/TIM.2012.2225961.

4. Zhang, Q., Y. S. Meng, Y. Shan, and Z. Lin, "Direct comparison transfer of microwave power sensor calibration with an adaptor: Modeling and evaluation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 38, 25-34, 2013.

5. BIPM, IEC, et al., "Evaluation of measurement data --- Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement,", JCGM 100 : 2008 (GUM 1995 with Minor Corrections), Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008.

6. Ridler, N. M. and J. C. Medley, "An uncertainty budget for VHF and UHF reflectometers," NPL Rep. DES 120, National Physical Laboratory, UK, 1992.

7. Ridler, N. M. and M. J. Salter, "An approach to the treatment of uncertainty in complex S-parameter measurements," Metrologia, Vol. 39, No. 3, 295-302, 2002.

8. Hall, B. D., "Calculating measurement uncertainty for complex-valued quantities," Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 368-375, 2003.

9. Hall, B. D., "On the propagation of uncertainty in complex-valued quantities," Metrologia, Vol. 41, No. 3, 173-177, 2004.

10. Hall, B. D., "Some considerations related to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty for complex-valued quantities in radio frequency measurements," Metrologia, Vol. 44, L62-L67, 2007.

11. Meng, Y. S. and Y. Shan, "Measurement uncertainty of complex-valued microwave quantities," Progress In Electromagnetics Research,, Vol. 136, 421-433, 2013.

12. R Development Core Team, "R: A language and environment for statistical computing,", Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2009, http://www.r-project.org/.

© Copyright 2010 EMW Publishing. All Rights Reserved