Vol. 109
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2022-04-15
Model Predictive Current Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor for Marine Electric Propulsion
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 109, 241-251, 2022
Abstract
In order to solve high torque ripple of permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) for marine electric propulsion under the current control methods, the improved model predictive current control (MPCC) of PMSM for marine electric propulsion based on the mathematical model of three-phase PMSM is proposed. First, the stator current prediction model is derived based on the forward Euler method. Then the first optimal voltage vector is obtained by the value function, and the second optimal voltage vector, and the second optimal voltage vector and the first and second optimal voltage vectors' respective action times are obtained by the q-axis deadbeat control, which are directly fed back to the inverter. The proposed control method is verified by simulation and hardware in the loop simulation experiment. The experiment results show that, in comparison with the direct torque control based on space vector modulation (SVM-DTC) in the case of motor speed and torque mutation, the torque ripple of motor is reduced by 9.40% and 4.80% respectively based on improved MPCC. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified by the simulation and experiment results.
Citation
Xiyang Zhao, Jingwei Zhu, and Zhibin Wang, "Model Predictive Current Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor for Marine Electric Propulsion," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 109, 241-251, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM22021001
References

1. Chandar, S. A. and S. K. Panda, "Detection and isolation of interturn faults in inductors of LCL filter for marine electric propulsion system," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, Vol. 4, No. 1, 232-248, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TTE.2017.2788189

2. Wen, S., T. Zhao, Y. Tang, Y. Xu, M. Zhu, and Y. Huang, "A joint photovoltaic-dependent navigation routing and energy storage system sizing scheme for more efficient all-electric ships," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1279-1289, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TTE.2020.3015983

3. Haxhiu, A., J. Kyyrä, R. Chan, and S. Kanerva, "Improved variable DC approach to minimize drivetrain losses in fuel cell marine power systems," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 57, No. 1, 882-893, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2020.3035337

4. Zhang, Z., H. Guo, Y. Liu, Q. Zhang, P. Zhu, and R. Iqbal, "An improved sensorless control strategy of ship IPMSM at full speed range," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 178652-178661, 2019.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958650

5. Ren, J., Y. Liu, N. Wang, et al. "Sensorless control of ship propulsion interior permanent magnet synchronous motor based on a new sliding mode observer," ISA Transactions, Vol. 54, No. 2, 15-26, 2015.
doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2014.08.008

6. Ojaghlu, P. and A. Vahedi, "Specification and design of ring winding axial flux motor for rim-driven thruster of ship electric propulsion," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 68, No. 2, 1318-1326, 2019.
doi:10.1109/TVT.2018.2888841

7. Xu, X., X. Song, K. Wang, et al. "Modulation and voltage balancing control of dual five-level ANPC inverter for ship electric propulsion systems," Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 4, 78-92, 2021.
doi:10.23919/CJEE.2021.000039

8. Amin, M. M., F. F. M. El-Sousy, O. A. Mohammed, G. A. A. Aziz, and K. Gaber, "MRAS-based super-twisting sliding-mode estimator combined with block control and DTC of six-phase induction motor for ship propulsion application," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 57, No. 6, 6646-6658, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2021.3115088

9. Jayaprakasan, S., S. Ashok, and R. Ramchand, "Current error space vector based hysteresis controller for VSI fed PMSM drive," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 35, No. 10, 10690-10699, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2020.2977581

10. Kim, J. S., S. Oh, and S. H. Kim, "A study on the speed and torque control of propulsion motor for electric propulsion ship by direct torque control," Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 946-951, 2009.
doi:10.5916/jkosme.2009.33.6.946

11. Zhang, X. and G. H. B. Foo, "A constant switching frequency-based direct torque control method for interior permanent-magnet synchronous motor drives," IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1445-1456, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TMECH.2015.2480782

12. Cheema, M. A. M., J. E. Fletcher, D. Xiao, and M. F. Rahman, "A direct thrust control scheme for linear permanent magnet synchronous motor based on online duty ratio control," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 31, No. 6, 4416-4428, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2015.2475400

13. Naganathan, P. and S. Srinivas, "Direct torque control techniques of three-level H-bridge inverter fed induction motor for torque ripple reduction at low speed operations," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 67, No. 10, 8262-8670, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2019.2950840

14. Lakhimsetty, S., V. S. P. Satelli, R. S. Rathore, and V. T. Somasekhar, "Multilevel torque hysteresis-band based direct-torque control strategy for a three-level open-end winding induction motor drive for electric vehicle applications," IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1969-1981, 2019.
doi:10.1109/JESTPE.2018.2870382

15. Sebtahmadi, S. S., H. Pirasteh, S. H. Aghay Kaboli, A. Radan, and S. Mekhilef, "A 12-sector space vector switching scheme for performance improvement of matrix-converter-based DTC of IM drive," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 30, No. 7, 3804-3817, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2014.2347457

16. Vinod, B. R., M. R. Baiju, and G. Shiny, "Five-level inverter-fed space vector based direct torque control of open-end winding induction motor drive," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1392-1401, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2018.2824350

17. Ananth, M. B. J., M. Vennila, and J. A. Thulasi, "A novel direct torque control scheme for induction machines with space vector modulation," 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), 4773-4779, 2016.
doi:10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7755625

18. Wang, Z., X. Wang, J. Cao, M. Cheng, and Y. Hu, "Direct torque control of T-NPC inverters-fed double-stator-winding PMSM drives with SVM," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1541-1553, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2017.2689008

19. Moati, Y., K. Kouzi, and A. Iqbal, "Adaptive optimized DTC-SVM using metaheuristic bat algorithm for DSIM fed by IMC based on robust synergetic speed controller," International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1-25, 2021.
doi:10.1002/2050-7038.12697

20. Luo, P., H. Zhao, C. Guo, and S. Cheng, "Model predictive control of permanent magnet synchronous propulsion motor applied in USV with composite ship-propeller load," 2018 Eighth International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST), 212-217, 2018.
doi:10.1109/ICIST.2018.8426076

21. Liu, C., Z. Pan, J.Wang, H. Fan, W. Yang, and H. Zhang, "Development of distributed photovoltaic grid-connected simulation system based on StarSim platform," 2020 IEEE 3rd Student Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (SCEMS), 843-846, 2020.
doi:10.1109/SCEMS48876.2020.9352438

22. Xiang, J., J. Xu, H. Wang, C. Li, G. Cui, and Y. Peng, "Reconfigurable line-side converter for DC voltage matching and ripple suppression in multisystem locomotives," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 36, No. 5, 5832-5844, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2020.3026682