Vol. 21
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2011-11-03
Experimental Investigation on the Power Electronic Transistor Parameters Influence to the Near-Field Radiation for the EMC Applications
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 21, 189-209, 2011
Abstract
With the increases of the module integration density and complexity in electrical and power electronic systems, serious problems related to electromagnetic interference (EMI) and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) can occur. For the safety, these disturbing effects must be considered during the electronic equipment design process. One of the concerns on EMC problems is induced by unintentional near-field (NF) radiations. The modeling and measurement of EM NF radiations is one of the bottlenecks which must be overcome by electronic engineers. To predict the unwanted different misbehaviors caused by the EM radiation, NF test benches for the reconstitution of scanning maps at some millimeters of electrical/electronic circuits under test were developed at the IRSEEM laboratory. Due to the difficulty of the design with commercial simulators, the prediction of EM NF emitted by active electronic systems which are usually based on the use of transistors necessitates more relevant and reliable analysis techniques. For this reason, the main focus of this article is on the experimental analysis of EM NF radiated by an MOSFET transistor with changing electrical parameters. Descriptions of the experimental test bench for the EM map scan of transistors radiation are provided. This experimental setup allows not only to detect the EM NF emission but also to analyze the influence of the excitation signal parameters as the cyclic ratio. It is found that the magnetic radiation is maximal when the cyclic ratio is close to 50%. In the future, In the future, the technique introduced in this article can be used to evaluate the EM radiation of embedded electronic/electrical devices in order to improve the safety and security of electronic systems.
Citation
Y. T. Manjombe, Y. Azzouz, David Baudry, Blaise Ravelo, and M. E. H. Benbouzid, "Experimental Investigation on the Power Electronic Transistor Parameters Influence to the Near-Field Radiation for the EMC Applications," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 21, 189-209, 2011.
doi:10.2528/PIERM11092302
References

1. Archambeault, B., C. Brench, and S. Connor, "Review of printed-circuit-board level EMI/EMC issues and tools," IEEE Trans. EMC, Vol. 52, No. 2, 455-461, May 2010.

2. Vye, D., "EMI by the dashboard light," Microwave Journal, Vol. 54, No. 7, 20-23, Jul. 2011.

3. Yang, T., Y. Bayram, and J. L. Volakis, "Hybrid analysis of electromagnetic interference effects on microwave active circuits within cavity enclosures," IEEE Trans. EMC, Vol. 52, No. 3, 745-748, Aug. 2010.

4. Wiles, M., "An overview of automotive EMC testing facilities," Automotive EMC Conference, Milton Keynes, UK, Nov. 6, 2003.

5. Shin, J., "Automotive EMC standards and testing," APEMC on Tutorial Workshop Digests on "Introduction to Automotive EMC Testing", Jeju, S. Korea, May 2011.

6. Liu, K., "An update on automotive EMC testing," Microwave Journal, Vol. 54, No. 7, 40-46, Jul. 2011.

7. De Leo, R., V. Mariani, and V. Vespasian, "Characterization of automotive battery in the RF range for EMC application," 14th Int. EMC Zurich Symp., Zurich, Switzerland, Feb. 20-22, 2001.

8. Paletta, L., J. P. Parmantier, F. Issac, P. Dumas, and J. C. Alliot, "Susceptibility analysis of wiring in a complex system combining a 3-D solver and a transmission-line network simulation," IEEE Trans. EMC, Vol. 44, No. 2, 309-317, May 2002.

9. Atrous, S., D. Baudry, E. Gaboriaud, A. Louis, B. Mazari, and D. Blavette, "Near-field investigation of the radiated susceptibility of printed circuit boards," Int. Symp. on EMC Europe, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 8-12, 2008.

10. Yang, T., Y. Bayram, and J. L. Volakis, "Hybrid analysis of electromagnetic interference effects on microwave active circuits within cavity enclosures," IEEE Trans. EMC, Vol. 52, No. 3, 745-748, Aug. 2010.

11. Laurin, J. J., Z. Ouardhiri, and J. Colinas, "Near-field imaging of radiated emission sources on printed-circuit boards," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, Vol. 1, 368-373, Aug. 2001.

12. Ostermann, T. and B. Deutschmann, "TEM-cell and surface scan to identify the electromagnetic emission of integrated circuits," Proc. 13th ACM Great Lakes Symp. VLSI, 76-79, Washington D.C., USA, 2003.

13. Aunchaleevarapan, K., K. Paithoonwatanakij, W. Khan-ngern, and S. Nitta, "Novel method for predicting PCB configurations for near-field and far-field radiated EMI using a neural network," IEICE Trans. Commun., Vol. B, No. 4, 1364-1376, Apr. 2003.

14. De Daran, F., J. Chollet-Ricard, F. Lafon, and O. Maurice, "Prediction of the field radiated at one meter from PCB's and microprocessors from near EM field cartography," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 479-482, Istanbul, Turkey, May 2003.

15. Baudry, D., F. Bicrel, L. Bouchelouk, A. Louis, B. Mazari, and P. Eudeline, "Near-field techniques for detecting EMI sources," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on EMC, Vol. 1, 11-13, Santa Clara, CA, USA, Aug. 2004.

16. Shi, J., M. Cracraft, J. Zhang, R. DuBroff, K. Slattery, and M. Yamaguchi, "Using near-field scanning to predict radiated fields," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 14-18, Santa Clara, CA, USA, Aug. 2004.

17. Chen, S., T. W. Nehl, J.-S. Lai, X. Huang, E. Pepa, R. De Doncker and I. Voss, "Towards EMI prediction of a PM motor drive for automotive applications," 18th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Vol. 1, 14-22, Orlando, FL, USA, Feb. 9{13, 2003.

18. Petre, P. and T. K. Sarkar, "Differences between modal expansion and integral equation methods for planar near-field to far-field transformation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 12, 37-56, 1996.

19. Regue, J. R., M. Ribo, J. M. Garrell, and A. Martin, "A genetic algorithm based method for source identification and far-field radiated emissions prediction from near-field measurements for PCB characterization," IEEE Trans. EMC, Vol. 43, No. 4, 520-530, Nov. 2001.

20. Regue, J. R., M. Ribo, J. Gomila, A. Perez, and A. Martin, "Modeling of radiating equipment by distributed dipoles using metaheuristic methods," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 8-12, Chicago, IL, USA, Aug. 2005.

21. Chiu, C.-N. and C.-C. Yang, "A solution for increasing immunity against the influence of ground variations on a board integrated GPS antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 15, 211-218, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERC10063001

22. Xie, H., J. Wang, R. Fan, and Y. Liu, "Spice models for radiated and conducted susceptibility analyses of multiconductor shielded cables," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 103, 241-257, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10020506

23. Fernandez Lopez, P., A. Ramanujan, Y. Vives Gilabert, C. Arcambal, A. Louis, and B. Mazari, "A radiated emission model compatible to a commercial electromagnetic simulation tool," 20th Int. EMC Zurich Symp., 369-372, Zurich, Switzerland, Jan. 2009.

24. Ravelo, B., "E-field extraction from H-near-field in time-domain by using PWS method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 25, 171-189, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERB10071307

25. Ravelo, B., Y. Liu, and J. B. H. Slama, "Time-domain planar near-field/near-field transforms with PWS method," Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 53, No. 3, 1-8, Feb. 2011.
doi:10.1051/epjap/2011100447

26. Ravelo, B., Y. Liu, A. Louis, and A. K. Jastrzebski, "Study of high-frequency electromagnetic transients radiated by electric dipoles in near-field," IET Microw. Antennas Propag., Vol. 5, No. 6, 692-698, Apr. 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-map.2010.0431

27. Haelvoet, K., S. Criel, F. Dobbelaere, L. Martens, P. De Laughe, and R. De Smedt, "Near-field scanner for the accurate characterization of electromagnetic fields in the close vicinity of electronic devices and systems," Proc. of IEEE Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf., Vol. 2, 1119-1123, Brussels, Belgium, Jun. 1996.

28. Gao, Y. and I. Wolff, "Measurements of fields distributions and scattering parameters in multiconductor structures using an electric field probe," Proc. of IEEE MTT-S Dig., Vol. 3, 1741-1744, Jun. 1997.

29. Dutta, S. K., C. P. Vlahacos, D. E. Steinhauer, A. S. Thanawalla, B. J. Feenstra, F. C. Wellstood, and S. M. Anlage, "Imaging microwave electric fields using a near-field scanning microwave microscope," Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 74, No. 1, 156-158, Jan. 1999.
doi:10.1063/1.123137

30. Kazama, S. and K. I. Arai, "Adjacent electric field and magnetic field distribution measurement system," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, Vol. 1, 395-400, Aug. 2002.

31. Labarre, C. and F. Costa, "Interpolation technique in magnetic near field scanning," Int. Symp. EMC, 1-6, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 8-12, 2008.

32. Baudry, D., L. Bouchelouk, A. Louis, and B. Mazari, "Near-field test bench for complete characterization of components radiated emission," Proc. of EMC Compo. Conference, 85-89, Angers, France, Apr. 2004.

33. Shi, J., R. DuBroff, M. Yamaguchi, and K. Slattery, "Frequency domain compensation of probe induced disturbances in near field measurements," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 165-168, Sendai, Japan, 2004.

34. Gao, Y. and I. Wolff, "Measurements of fields distributions and scattering parameters in multiconductor structures using an electric field probe," IEEE MTT-S Digest, 1741-1744, 1997.

35. Dutta, S. K., C. P. Vlahacos, D. E. Steinhauer, A. S. Thanawalla, B. J. Feenstra, F. C. Wellstood, and S. M. Anlage, "Imaging microwave electric fields using a near-field scanning microwave microscope," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 74, No. 1, 156-158, Jan. 1999.
doi:10.1063/1.123137

36. Baudry, D., A. Louis, and B. Mazari, "Characterization of the open ended coaxial probe used for near field measurements in EMC applications," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 60, 311-333, 2006.
doi:10.2528/PIER05112501