Vol. 76
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2017-06-10
Analytical Method Using Virtual PM Blocks to Represent Magnet Segmentations in Surface-Mounted PM Synchronous Machines
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 76, 23-36, 2017
Abstract
This paper describes an analytical subdomain model to predict the magnetic field distributions in the semi-closed surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) due to magnet segmentations with radial magnetization (RM). The magnet segments per pole can be virtually represented by finite number of permanent magnet (PM) blocks and Fourier decompositions. The model can also determine the optimum magnet pole-arcs for each segment and the optimum airgap spacing between the segments. The analytical model is then applied to evaluate the performance of a three-phase, 12-slot/8-pole, surface-mounted PMSM having two segmented magnets per pole with RM. With design objective for minimum cogging torque and minimum total harmonic distortion in phase back-emf waveforms, we obtain that the optimum settings are 147.6° elect. for magnet segment pole-arc and 11.2° elect. for airgap spacing between the magnet segments. These analytical results are further compared and validated by 2-D finite element analysis (FEA). Additionally, we also compare the results with those from the optimum magnet pole-arc of one magnet segment per pole machine. It is observed that the cogging torque and total harmonic distortion THDv of the phase back-EMF are significantly reduced by 89% and 25%, respectively, with constraint and assumption that both machines utilize similar total magnet volume.
Citation
Tow Leong Tiang, Dahaman Ishak, Chee Peng Lim, and Mohd Rezal Mohamed, "Analytical Method Using Virtual PM Blocks to Represent Magnet Segmentations in Surface-Mounted PM Synchronous Machines," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 76, 23-36, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERB17041501
References

1. Bianchi, N., S. Bolognani, and F. Luise, "Potentials and limits of high-speed PM motors," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 40, 1570-1578, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2004.836173

2. Pfister, P. D. and Y. Perriard, "Very-high-speed slotless permanent-magnet motors: Analytical modeling, optimization, design, and torque measurement methods," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 57, 296-303, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2009.2027919

3. Magnussen, F. and H. Lendenmann, "Parasitic effects in PM machines with concentrated windings," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 43, 1223-1232, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2007.904400

4. Valavi, M., A. Nysveen, R. Nilssen, R. D. Lorenz, and T. Rølvag, "Influence of pole and slot combinations on magnetic forces and vibration in low-speed PM wind generators," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 50, 2014.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2013.2293124

5. Islam, M. S., S. Mir, T. Sebastian, and S. Underwood, "Design considerations of sinusoidally excited permanent-magnet machines for low-torque-ripple applications," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 41, 955-962, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2005.851026

6. Jahns, T. M. and W. L. Soong, "Pulsating torque minimization techniques for permanent magnet AC motor drives-a review," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 43, 321-330, 1996.
doi:10.1109/41.491356

7. Polinder, H. and M. J. Hoeijmakers, "Eddy-current losses in the segmented surface-mounted magnets of a PM machine," IEE Proceedings — Electric Power Applications, Vol. 146, 261-266, 1999.
doi:10.1049/ip-epa:19990091

8. Madina, P., J. Poza, G. Ugalde, and G. Almandoz, "Analysis of non-uniform circumferential segmentation of magnets to reduce eddy-current losses in SPMSM machines," 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines Proceedings 2012 (ICEM 2012), 79-84, 2012.

9. Belli, Z. and M. R. Mekideche, "Optimization of magnets segmentation for eddy current losses reduction in permanent magnets electrical machines," 8th International Conference and Exhibition on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies 2013 (EVER 2013), 2013.

10. Lateb, R., N. Takorabet, and F. Meibody-Tabar, "Effect of magnet segmentation on the cogging torque in surface-mounted permanent-magnet motors," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 42, 442-445, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.862756

11. Ashabani, M. and Y. A. R. I. Mohamed, "Multiobjective shape optimization of segmented pole permanent-magnet synchronous machines with improved torque characteristics," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 47, 795-804, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2010.2104327

12. Ghasemi, A., "Cogging torque reduction and optimization in surface-mounted permanent magnet motor using magnet segmentation method," Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 42, 1239-1248, 2014.
doi:10.1080/15325008.2014.893548

13. Tiang, T. L., D. Ishak, C. P. Lim, and M. K. M. Jamil, "A comprehensive analytical subdomain model and its field solutions for surface-mounted permanent magnet machines," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 51, 1-14, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2014.2361484

14. Tiang, T. L., D. Ishak, C. P. Lim, and M. Kamarol, "Analytical assessment of optimum magnet pole-arc for PMSM under influence of different magnetization patterns," IEEE International Magnetics Conference 2015 (INTERMAG 2015), Beijing, China, 2015.

15. Rahideh, A. and T. Korakianitis, "Analytical magnetic field distribution of slotless brushless PM motors. Part 2: Open-circuit field and torque calculations," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 6, 639-651, 2012.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2011.0386

16. Wu, L. J., Z. Q. Zhu, D. Staton, M. Popescu, and D. Hawkins, "Analytical prediction of electromagnetic performance of surface-mounted PM machines based on subdomain model accounting for tooth-tips," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 5, 597-609, 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2010.0271

17. Rahideh, A., H. Moayed-Jahromi, M. Mardaneh, F. Dubas, and T. Korakianitis, "Analytical calculations of electromagnetic quantities for slotted brushless machines with surface-inset magnets," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 72, 49-65, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERB16091502

18. Lubin, T., S. Mezani, and A. Rezzoug, "2-D exact analytical model for surface-mounted permanentmagnet motors with semi-closed slots," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 47, 479-492, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2010.2095874