Vol. 79
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2018-01-25
Fuzzy Logic Biased Optimal Dipole-Linear Antenna Array: an Improved Array with Better Tradeoff Between Performance Parameters
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 79, 167-190, 2017
Abstract
Linear antenna array design is a multi-parameter, multi-objective, and nonlinear problem which requires optimal design parameters to get desired performance. To achieve desired performance through multi-objective optimization process, a compromise among desired objectives is essential. In such a situation to make a rational decision on global optimization to avoid arbitrary compromise to any objective, we introduced two fuzzy logic biased/fuzzy biased optimization techniques. We proposed fuzzy logic biased biogeography based optimization algorithm and fuzzy biased gravitational search optimization algorithm to solve M-element nonlinear linear antenna array design problem. In our design problem, we have considered a 16-element dipole-linear antenna array. The optimal design problem incudes thirty one design parameters (sixteen lengths, and fifteen spacings) and four performance parameters such as directivity, front to maximum side-lobe level, half power beamwidth, and front to back ratio. The result shows that applications of fuzzy biased optimizations are more efficient for solving multi objective problem. While analysing the linear antenna array, mutual coupling is taken into account for numerical analysis using method of moment.
Citation
Saumendra Kumar Mohanty, and Biswa Mangaraj, "Fuzzy Logic Biased Optimal Dipole-Linear Antenna Array: an Improved Array with Better Tradeoff Between Performance Parameters," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 79, 167-190, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERB17070402
References

1. Balanis, Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005.

2. Mahanti, G. K., N. Pathak, and P. Mahanti, "Synthesis of thinned linear antenna arrays with fixed side lobe level using real coded genetic algorithm," Progress In Electromagnetic Research, Vol. 75, 319-328, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07061304

3. Datta, T. and I. S. Misra, "A comparative study of optimization technique in adaptive antenna processing: The bacteria foraging algorithm and particle swarm optimization," IEEE Antenna and Propagation Mag., Vol. 51, No. 6, 69-81, 2009.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2009.5433098

4. Chatterjee, A. and G. K. Mahanti, "Comparative study of gravitational search algorithm and modified particle swarm optimization for synthesis of thinned scanned concentric ring array antenna," Progress in Electro Magnetic Research B, Vol. 25, 331-348, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERB10080405

5. Sotirios, K. G., M. Vasiliki, and T. Samaras, "Application of a comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization to unequally spaced linear array synthesis with side lobe level suppression and null control," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Lett., Vol. 9, 125-129, 2010.

6. Mangaraj, B. B., I. S. Misra, and A. Barisal, "Optimizing included angle of symmetrical v-dipoles for higher directivity using bacteria foraging optimization algorithm," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 3, 295-314, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIERB07121005

7. Mangaraj, B. B., S. K. Mohanty, and M. R. Jena, "Bacteria foraging algorithm in antenna design," Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Comp., Article ID 5983469, 11 pages, 2016.

8. Casula, G. A., G. Mazzarella, and N. Sirena, "Evolutionary design of wide-band parasitic dipole arrays," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 59, No. 11, 4094-4102, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2011.2164185

9. Mandal, A., H. Zafar, S. Das, and A. V. Vasilakos, "A modified differential evolution algorithm for shaped beam linear antenna array design," Progress In Electromagnetic Research, Vol. 125, 439-457, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIER11112408

10. Liu, Y., Z. Nie, and Q. H. Liu, "Reducing the number of elements in a linear antenna array by the matrix pencil method," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 56, No. 9, 2955-2962, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2008.928801

11. Simon, D., "Biogeography based optimization," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Comp., Vol. 12, No. 6, 702-713, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TEVC.2008.919004

12. Simon, D., "A probabilistic analysis of a simplified biogeography based optimization algorithm," Evolutionary Comp., Vol. 19, No. 2, 167-188, 2011.
doi:10.1162/EVCO_a_00018

13. Mangaraj, B. B. and P. Swain, "An optimal LAA subsystem designed using gravitational search algorithm," An International Journal Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 494-501, 2017.
doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2017.01.002

14. Swain, P., S. K. Mohanty, and B. B. Mangaraj, "Linear dipole antenna array design and optimization using gravitational search algorithm," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics, 514-518, Tamilnadu, India, 2016.

15. Mazzarella, G. and G. Panariello, "Array thinning in conformal arrays synthesis," IEEE AP-S International Symposiumon Antennas and Propagation Society, 506-509, Seattle, WA, USA, 1994.

16. Orchard, H. J. and R. S. Elliott, "Optimizing the synthesis of shaped beam antenna patterns," Proc. Inst. Elelc. Eng., Vol. 132, 63-68, 1985.

17. Elmikati, H. and A. A. Elsohly, "Extension of projection method to nonuniformly linear antenna arrays," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 32, 507-512, 1984.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1984.1143359

18. Verma, M. and S. K. Shukla, "Application of fuzzy optimization to orienting problem," Advances in Fuzzy Systems, Article ID 569248, 12 pages, 2015.

19. Zadeh, L. A., "Fuzzy sets," Information and Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, 338-353, 1965.
doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

20. Rashedi, E., H. Nezamabadi-pour, and S. Saryazdi, "GSA: A gravitational search algorithm," Information Sciences, Vol. 179, 2232-2248, 2009.
doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004

21. Wang, H. J., et al. "Optimization of Yagi array by hierarchical genetic algorithms," Radio and Wireless Conference, 91-94, Boston, Massachusetts, 2003.

22. Viezbicke, P. P., "Yagi antenna design," NBS Technical Note, Vol. 688, 1-22, 1976.

23. Baskar, S., et al. "Design of Yagi-Uda antennas using comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization," IEE Proc. --- Microw. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 152, 340-346, 2005.
doi:10.1049/ip-map:20045087

24. Venkatarayalu, N. V. and T. Ray, "Optimum design of Yagi-Uda antennas using computational intelligence," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 52, 1811-1818, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2004.831338

25. Jones, E. A. and W. T. Joines, "Design of Yagi-Uda antennas using genetic algorithms," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 45, 1386-1392, 1997.
doi:10.1109/8.623128

26. Mangaraj, B. B., I. S. Misra, and S. K. Sanyal, "Application of bacteria foraging algorithm for the design optimization of multi-objective Yagi-Uda array," International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 25-35, 2011.
doi:10.1002/mmce.20483

27. Altshuler, E. E. and D. S. Linden, "Wire-antenna designs using GA," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Mag., Vol. 39, 33-43, 1997.
doi:10.1109/74.584498

28. Shreni, V. and P. Raikwar, "Optimization of reduction in side lobe level using genetic algorithm," International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engg., Vol. 2, 202-205, 2012.

29. Pantoja, M. F., et al. "PSO in antenna design: Optimization of log-periodic dipole arrays," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Mag., Vol. 49, 34-47, 2007.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2007.4385594

30. Roy, S., et al. "A multi-objective evolutionary approach for linear antenna array design and synthesis," IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1-8, Brisbane, QLD, 2012.

31. Pal, S., et al. "Optimal synthesis of linear antenna arrays with multi-objective differential evolution," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 21, 87-11, 2010.

32. Mahanti, G. K., N. Pathak, and P. Mahanti, "Synthesis of thinned linear antenna arrays with fixed sidelobe level using real-coded genetic algorithm," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 75, 319-328, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07061304