Vol. 81

Front:[PDF file] Back:[PDF file]
Latest Volume
All Volumes
All Issues
2018-02-12

A Comparative Study of Quasi-FEA Technique on Iron Losses Prediction for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

By Pedram Asef, Ramon Bargallo Perpina, M. R. Barzegaran, Jianning Dong, Andrew Lapthorn, and Osama A. Mohammed
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 81, 101-113, 2018
doi:10.2528/PIERC17102702

Abstract

The paper presents an advanced quasi-FEA technique on the iron losses prediction using Bertotti's iron loss separation models, in which a curve fitting is taken into account for coefficients calculation of each model. Moreover, the skin effect and saturation consideration are applied in order to check the accuracy through the relative error distribution in the frequency domain of each model from low up to high frequencies 50 to 700 (Hz). Additionally, this comparative study presents a torque-speed-flux density computation that is discussed and presented. The iron loss characteristics of a radial flux permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) with closed-slots and outer rotor topology are also discussed. The quasi-finite-element (FE) analysis was performed using a 2-D and 3-D FEA, where the employed quasi-2-D FEA is proposed and compared with 3-D FEA, and along with experimental verifications. Finally, all the iron-loss models under realistic and non-ideal magnetization conditions are verified experimentally on a surface-mounted PMSG for wind generation application.

Citation


Pedram Asef, Ramon Bargallo Perpina, M. R. Barzegaran, Jianning Dong, Andrew Lapthorn, and Osama A. Mohammed, "A Comparative Study of Quasi-FEA Technique on Iron Losses Prediction for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 81, 101-113, 2018.
doi:10.2528/PIERC17102702
http://www.jpier.org/PIERC/pier.php?paper=17102702

References


    1. Asef, P., "Design, characteristic analysis of PM wind generator based on SMC material for small direct-drive wind energy conversion system," International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), Vol. 41, DOI: 10.1109/ICRERA.2014.7016437, USA, 2014.

    2. Harrison, R., E. Hau, and H. Snel, Large Wind Turbines Design and Economics, Wiley, New York, 2000 (ISBN 0471-494569).

    3. Dubois, M. R., "Optimized permanent magnet generator topologies for direct-drive wind tur-bines,", Ph.D. dissertation, Delft Univ. Technol., Delft, The Netherlands, 2004.

    4. Grauers, A., "Design of direct-driven permanent-magnet generators for wind turbines,", Ph.D. dissertation, Chalmers Univ. Technol., Goteborg, Sweden, 1996.

    5. Poore, R. and T. Lettenmaier, "Alternative design study report: Wind PACT advanced wind tur-bine drive train designs study," NREL, Golden, CO, Rep. NREL/SR-500-33196, Aug. 2003.

    6. Cotrell, J. R., "A preliminary evaluation of a multiple-generator drive train configuration for wind turbines," presented at the 2002 ASME Wind Energy Symp., 40th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meeting Exhibit, Collection Tech. Papers, Reno, NV, Jan. 14-17, 2002.

    7. Martin, F., et al., "Improved analytical determination of eddy current losses in surface mounted permanent magnets of synchronous machine," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 50, No. 6, 1-8, Jun. 2014.

    8. Hemeida, A., et al., "Comparison of methods for permanent magnet eddy-current loss computations with and without reaction field considerations in axial flux PMSM," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 51, No. 9, 1-8, Sep. 2015.
    doi:10.1109/TMAG.2015.2431222

    9. Kakhki, M. T., et al., "New approach for accurate prediction of eddy current losses in laminated material in the presence of skin effect with 2-D FEA," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 52, No. 3, 1-4, Mar. 2016.
    doi:10.1109/TMAG.2015.2481924

    10. Huang, W. Y., et al., "Optimization of magnet segmentation for reduction of eddy-current losses in permanent magnet synchronous machine," IEEE Trans. Energy Conv., Vol. 25, No. 2, 381-386, 2010.
    doi:10.1109/TEC.2009.2036250

    11. Steentjes, S., et al., "Iron-loss model with consideration of minor loops applied to FE-simulations of electrical machines ," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 49, No. 7, 3945-3948, Jul. 2013.
    doi:10.1109/TMAG.2013.2244072

    12. Eggers, D., et al., "Advanced iron-loss estimation for nonlinear material behavior," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 48, No. 11, 3021-3024, Nov. 2012.
    doi:10.1109/TMAG.2012.2208944

    13. Bertotti, G., "General properties of power losses in soft ferromagnetic materials," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 1988.
    doi:10.1109/20.43994

    14. Bertotti, G. and M. Pasquale, "Physical interpretation of induction and frequency dependence of power losses in soft magnetic materials," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 28, No. 5, Sep. 1992.
    doi:10.1109/20.179704

    15. Bertotti, G., et al., "An improved estimation of iron losses in rotating electrical machines," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 27, No. 6, Nov. 1991.

    16. Fratila, M., et al., "Iron loss calculation in a synchronous generator using finite element analysis," IEEE Tran. Energy Conv., Vol. PP, No. 99, 1-8, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2017.2648512, 2017.

    17. Rasilo, P., et al., "Experimental determination and numerical evaluation of core losses in a 150-kVA wound-field synchronous machine," IET Electric Power App., Vol. 7, No. 2, 97-105, doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2012.02422013.
    doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2012.0242

    18. Kowal, D., et al., "Comparison of frequency and time-domain iron and magnet loss modeling including PWM harmonics in a PMSG for a wind energy application," IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 30, No. 2, 476-486, 2015.
    doi:10.1109/TEC.2014.2373312

    19. Pfingsten, G. V., et al., "Operating point resolved loss calculation approach in saturated induction machines," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr., Vol. 64, No. 3, 2538-2546, 2017.
    doi:10.1109/TIE.2016.2597761

    20. Boglietti, A., A. Cavagnino, M. Lazzari, and M. Pastorelli, "Predicting iron losses in soft mag-netic materials with arbitrary voltage supply: An engineering approach," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 39, No. 2, 981-989, 2003.
    doi:10.1109/TMAG.2003.808599

    21. Krings, A. and J. Soulard, "Overview and comparison of iron loss models for electrical ma-chines," Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 3, 162-169, 2010.

    22. Ionel, D. M., M. Popescu, S. J. Dellinger, T. J. E. Miller, R. J. Heideman, and M. I. McGilp, "On the variation with flux and frequency of the core loss coefficients in electrical machines," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 42, No. 3, 658-667, May 2006.
    doi:10.1109/TIA.2006.872941

    23. Ionel, D. M., M. Popescu, M. I. McGilp, T. J. E. Miller, S. J. Dellinger, and R. J. Heideman, "Computation of core losses in electrical machines using improved models for laminated steel," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 43, No. 6, 1554-1564, Nov. 2007.
    doi:10.1109/TIA.2007.908159

    24. Huang, Y., J. Dong, J. G. Zhu, and Y. Guo, "Core loss modeling for permanent-magnet motor based on flux variation locus and finite-element method ," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 48, No. 2, 1023-1026, 2012.
    doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2174201

    25. Gerlando, A. D. and R. Perini, "Evaluation of the effects of the voltage harmonics on the extra iron losses in the inverter fed electromagnetic devices," IEEE Trans. on Energy Conv., Vol. 14, No. 1, 57-62, Mar. 1999.
    doi:10.1109/60.749148

    26. Lasdon, L. S., et al., "Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear optimization," Case Western Reserve University, National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce (NTIS), AD-A009-402, 1-45, Mar. 1975.