Vol. 89
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2020-01-29
Crosstalk Cancellation Method in a Complex Interconnection Structure
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 89, 133-139, 2020
Abstract
Complex interconnection structure is a common structure on printed circuit board (PCB). Herein, the paper proposes a method of crosstalk cancellation point at the crosstalk problem between microstrip lines in a complex interconnection structure. First, a model of the coupled transmission lines-channel transmission matrix (CTL-CTM) of the complex interconnection structure is established. Second, the CTL-CTM is simplified through the equivalence of crosstalk-coupling coefficient of parallel coupling microstrip lines to that of the complex interconnection structure. The eigenvalue of the simplified CTL-CTM is then decomposed, based on which the construction of crosstalk cancellation circuit is performed. Simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively improve the quality of eye patterns on complex interconnection structures.
Citation
Yafei Wang, Huifang Sun, and Xuehua Li, "Crosstalk Cancellation Method in a Complex Interconnection Structure," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 89, 133-139, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERL19111102
References

1. Mao, J. and M. Tang, High Speed Integrated Circuit Interconnection, Science Press, Beijing, 2017.

2. Halligan, M. and D. Beetne, "Maximum crosstalk estimation in, weakly coupled transmission lines," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 56, No. 3, 736-743, 2014.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2014.2304735

3. Gao, X., H. Zhang, P. He, et al. "Crosstalk suppression based on mode mismatch between spoof SPP transmission line and microstrip," IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, 1-7, 2019.

4. Paul, C. R., Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2005.
doi:10.1002/0471758159

5. Refaie, M. I., W. S. El-Deeb, and M. I. Abdalla, "A study of using graphene coated microstrip lines for crosstalk reduction at radio frequency," Proceedings of the 35th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC), 85-90, Cairo, Egypt, March 20–22, 2018.

6. Xu, J. and S. Wang, "Investigating a guard trace ring to suppress the crosstalk due to a clock trace on a power electronics DSP control board," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 57, No. 3, 546-554, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2015.2403289

7. Huang, B., K. Che, and C. Wang, "Far-end crosstalk noise reduction using decoupling capacitor," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 1, 1-13, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2016.2515855

8. Balakrishnan, R., S. A. Thomas, and S. Sharan, "Crosstalk and EMI Reduction using enhanced Guard Trace Technique," 2018 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems Symposium (EDAPS), 1-3, Chandigarh, India, December 16–18, 2018.

9. Liu, X., Y. Li, Y. Zhao, et al. "Crosstalk reduction design and analysis of the planar meander transmission lines," Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), 1-2, Busan, Korea, October 23–26, 2018.

10. Quan, H. and Z. Sun, "Research on guard band to reduce the crosstalk for non-parallel microstrip lines," Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument, Vol. 25, No. 10, 850-856, 2011.
doi:10.3724/SP.J.1187.2011.00850

11. Wang, Y. and X. Li, "Crosstalk cancellation method based on unitary transformation of coupled transmission lines-channel transmission matrix," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 52, 45-50, 2015.
doi:10.2528/PIERL15011602

12. Li, P., Jitter, Noise, and Signal Integrity at High-Speed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2008.

13. Liang, C., Computing Microwave, Xidian University Press, Xian, 2012.

14. Wang, Y., "Crosstalk cancellation for non-parallel microstrip lines," Journal of Microwaves, Vol. 34, No. 3, 65-68, 2018.

15. Liu, X., X. Zhong, Z. Ye, et al. "Transmission line equation based crosstalk analysis of multiconductor nonparallel transmission line," Modern Electronics Technique, Vol. 40, No. 1, 163-166, 2017.