Based on a proposed inexact Hodge decomposition, this paper describes a viable scheme using the second order finite elements in the T-Ω method considering multiply-connected regions for the eddy current problems. Several numerical examples have been presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of this scheme.
10. Deschamps, G. A., "Electromagnetics and differential forms," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 69, 676-696, 1981. doi:10.1109/PROC.1981.12048
11. Lee, S., J. Lee, and R. Lee, "Hierarchical vector finite elements for analyzing waveguiding structures," IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 51, No. 5, 1897-1905, 2003.
12. Ren, Z., "Application of differential forms in the finite element formulation of electromagnetic problems," ICS Newsletter, Vol. 7, No. 3, 6-11, 2000.
13. Webb, J. P. and B. Forghani, "Hierarchal scalar and vector tetrahedra," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 29, 1495-1498, 1993. doi:10.1109/20.250686
14. Zienkiewicz, O. C., R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu, The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.
15. Kettunen, L., K. Forsman, and A. Bossavit, "Discrete spaces for div and curl-free fields," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 34, 2551-2554, 2002.
16. Ren, Z., "T-Ω formulation for eddy current problems in multiply connected regions," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 38, 557-560, 2002. doi:10.1109/20.996146
17. Demenko, A. and J. K. Sykulski, "Network representation of conducting regions in 3D finite element description of electrical machines," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 44, No. 6, 714-717, 2008. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2007.916391
18. Wojciechowski, R. M., A. Demenko, and J. K. Sykulski, "Inducted currents analysis in multiply connected conductors using reluctance-resistance networks," COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 4, 908-918, 2010. doi:10.1108/03321641011044325
19. Dlotko, P. and R. Specogna, "Lazy cohomology generators: A breakthrough in (co)homology computations for CEM," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 50, No. 2, 577-580, 2014. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2013.2281076
20. Simkin, J., S. C. Taylor, and E. X. Xu, "An efficient algorithm for cutting multiply connected regions," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 40, No. 2, 707-709, 2004. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.825037
21. Phung, A. T., O. Chadebec, P. Labie, Y. Le Floch, and G. Meunier, "Automatic cuts for magnetic scalar potential formulations," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 41, No. 5, 1668-1671, 2005. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.846105
22. Crager, J. C. and P. R. Kotiuga, "Cuts for the magnetic scalar potential in knotted geometries and force-free magnetic fields," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 38, No. 2, 1309-1312, 2002. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2002.996334
23. Gross, P. W. and P. R. Kotiuga, "Finite element-based algorithms to make cuts for magnetic scalar potentials: Topological constraints and computational complexity," Geometric Methods for Computational Electromagnetics, Vol. 32, 207-245, 2001.
25. Biro, O., K. Preis, W. Renhart, K. R. Ritcher, and G. Vrisk, "Performance of different vector potential formulations in solving multiply connected 3D eddy current problems," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 26, 438-441, 1990. doi:10.1109/20.106347
26. Cheng, Z., N. Takahashi, Q. Hu, and C. C. Fan, "TEAM-based benchmark family: Problem 21/21 + 21," Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Computation in Electromagnetics, 2002.