Vol. 48
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2016-05-05
Range Distance Requirements for Large Antenna Measurements for Linear Aperture with Uniform Field Distribution
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 48, 87-94, 2016
Abstract
Gain reduction on measurement of distance and on sizes of test and probe antennas are discussed. We consider only the case of linear antenna with uniform field distribution. The analysis is based on time-domain (TD) physical optics (PO) method of field calculation [1]. We show that in determining the level of the side lobe there are two competing effects: (i) the decrease in the amplitude of the signal in the direction of the side lobe and (ii) reducing the maximum signal level in the direction of zero-angle. We show the optimal measurement distance with respect to the acceptable small errors of antenna gain. It is shown that optimal relation β=b/a is about ~0.4 (a and b are the sizes of the antenna under test and the probe antenna). For this optimal relation, the well-known far-field distance criterion R0=2D2/λ can be reduced by 2 times (D is the diameters of the antenna under test and λ is wavelength). Note that when b is optimal, the errors in determining of the sidelobe levels are also small and do not exceed 0.5 dB.
Citation
Sergey P. Skulkin, Victor I. Turchin, and Nikolay I. Kascheev, "Range Distance Requirements for Large Antenna Measurements for Linear Aperture with Uniform Field Distribution," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 48, 87-94, 2016.
doi:10.2528/PIERM16031604
References

1. Skulkin, S. P. and V. I. Turchin, "Transient field calculation of aperture antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 47, 929-932, May 1999.
doi:10.1109/8.774158

2. Hacker, P. S. and H. E. Schrank, "Range distance requirement for measuring low and ultralow sidelobe antenna patterns," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 30, No. 5, 956-966, Sept. 1982.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1982.1142916

3. Hansen, R. C., "Measurement distance effects on low sidelobe patterns," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 32, No. 6, 591-594, Jun. 1984.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1984.1143386

4. Hansen, R. C., "Array pattern control and synthesis," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 80, 141-151, Jan. 1992.
doi:10.1109/5.119573

5. Hansen, R. C., "Measurement distance effects on Bayliss difference patterns," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 40, No. 10, 1211-1214, Oct. 1992.
doi:10.1109/8.182453

6. Bregains, J., F. Ares, and E. Moreno, "Effects of measurement distance on measurements of symmetrically shaped patterns generated by line sources," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 45, No. 1, 106-109, Feb. 2003.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2003.1189654

7. Bregains, J. C., F. Ares, and E. Moreno, "Measurement distance effects on Φ-symmetric shaped patterns generated by circular continuous apertures," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 45, No. 5, 68-70, Oct. 2003.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2003.1252812

8. Corona, P., G. Ferrara, and C. Gennarelli, "Measurement distance requirements for both symmetrical and antisymmetrical aperture antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 37, No. 8, 990-995, Aug. 1989.
doi:10.1109/8.34135

9. Orefice, M., M. A. Razzaq, and G. Dassano, "Sidelobe level correction for parabolic antennas radiation pattern measurements in quasi-far-field conditions," Electronics Letters, Vol. 49, No. 23, 1423-1425, ISSN 0013-5194, 2013.
doi:10.1049/el.2013.3015

10. Mentzer, J. R., Scattering and Diffraction of Radio Wave, Chapter 5, Pergamon, Elmsford, NY, 1955.

11. Rhodes, D. R., "On minimum range for radiation patterns," Proc. IRE, Vol. 42, 1048-1410, Sept. 1954.

12. Jull, E. V., "An investigation of near-field radiation patterns measured with large antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 10, 363-369, 1962.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1962.1137886

13. Uno, T. and S. Adachi, "Range distance requirements for large antenna measurements," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 37, 707-720, Jun. 1989.
doi:10.1109/8.29357

14. Hu, M. K., "Near zone power transmission," IRE Nat. Conv. Rec., Pt. 8, 128-138, 1958.

15. Brown, J. and E. V. Jull, "The prediction of aerial radiation patterns from near-field measurements," Proc. IEE, Vol. 105B, 635-644, Nov. 1961.

16. Kim, J.-H. and H.-K. Choi, "Antenna radiation pattern measurement at a reduced distance," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 54, No. 2, 673-675, Apr. 2005.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2004.843419

17. Skulkin, S. P. and Y. E. Sorpov, "An analysis of range distance requirements for large antennas by the use of the pulse radiating characteristics of aperture," Proc. IEEE AP-S/URSI Symposium, 1758-1761, Newport Beach, USA, Jun. 1995.

18. Skulkin, S. P. and A. V. Sudaev, "The time domain analysis of range distance requirements for large antenna measurements," Proc. XXVth General Assembly URSI, 587, Lille, France, Aug. 1996.

19. Skulkin, S. P., "Transient fields of rectangular aperture antennas, in ultra-wideband, short-pulse electromagnetics,", C. E. Baum, L. Carin, A. P. Stone (eds.), Vol. 3, 57-63, Plenum, 1997.

20. Skulkin, S. P. and V. I. Turchin, "Transient fields of parabolic reflector antennas. in ultra-wideband, short-pulse electromagnetics,", C. E. Baum, L. Carin, A. P. Stone, Eds., Vol. 3, 81-87, Plenum, 1997.

21. Skulkin, S. P. and V. I. Turchin, "Transient fields of offset reflector," Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics, P. D. Smith and S. R. Cloude (eds.), Vol. 5, 371-375, Springer, US, 2002.

22. Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 3rd Ed., 70, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971.