Vol. 107
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2021-12-28
Numerical Simulation and Application of Response Characteristics of High-Frequency Dielectric Logging Instrument
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 107, 1-12, 2022
Abstract
Complex reservoirs such as fresh-water formations and water-flooded reservoirs developed by water injection have complex electrical characteristics owing to the influence of formation water salinity. It is difficult to accurately evaluate and identify the fluid in such complex reservoirs by using the conventional resistivity method. However, the water salinity of the formation has a reduced effect on its dielectric constant; therefore, dielectric logging technology can be used to effectively identify fresh-water formation and evaluate the water-flooding level of the water-flooded layer. The accuracy of the formation response inversion charts of dielectric logging instruments is important for accurately evaluating fluids in complex reservoirs when these instruments are used. This study proposes a full-wave simulation method based on Maxwell's equations and the engineering parameters value of the dielectric logging instrument. The formation response conversion charts of the dielectric logging instrumentare accurately calculated and can be used in practical logging; the simulation results are compared with those obtained using an equivalent magnetic dipole model; Based on the accurate simulation of the formation response of the dielectric logging instrument, a high-frequency dielectric logging instrumentis developed, and it is applied to the fresh-water formation and water-flooded layer in the Nanyang and Ordos Basins.
Citation
Chen Li Shaogui Deng Zhiqiang Li Yiren Fan Jingjing Zhang Jutao Yang , "Numerical Simulation and Application of Response Characteristics of High-Frequency Dielectric Logging Instrument," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 107, 1-12, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21111603
http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pier.php?paper=21111603
References

1. Freedman, R. and J. P. Vogiatzis, "Theory of microwave dielectric constant logging using the electromagnetic wave propagation method," Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 5, 969-986, 1979.
doi:10.1190/1.1440989

2. Blenkinsop, M., P. Baker, C. Clavier, W. Kenyon, and S. des Listerine, "Deep electromagnetic propagation tool interpretation," SPWLA 27th Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-1986-XX, June 9-13, 1986.

3. Rau, R., R. Davies, M. Finke, and M. Manning, "Advance in high frequency dielectric logging," SPWLA 32nd Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-1991-S, June 16-19, 1991.

4. Song, Y. L., G. H. Chen, and M. C. Chang, "Study and application of electromagnetic logging in Daqing oilfield," Petroleum Geological Development in Daqing, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1997.

5. Clark, B., M. G. Liiling, J. Jundt, M. Ross, and D. Best, "A dual depth resistivity measurement for FEWD," SPWLA 29th Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-1988-A, June 5-8, 1988.

6. Clark, B., et al., "Electromagnetic propagation logging while drilling: Theory and experiment," SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 5, No. 3, 263-271, SPE-18117-PA, 1990.
doi:10.2118/18117-PA

7. Coope, D., L. C. Shen, and F. S. C. Huang, "The theory of 2 MHz resistivity tool and its application to measurement-while-drilling," The Log Analyst, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1-11, 1984.

8. Yang, J., D. Omeragic, and C. B. Liu, "Bed-boundary effect removal to aid formation resistivity interpretation from LWD propagation measurements at all dip angles," SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-2005-F, 2005.

9. Schlumberger Technology Corp., "New technology and application of dielectric logging," New Technology of Oilfield, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2011.

10. Halliburton Company, "LOGIQ high-frequency dielectric tool manual,", 2011.

11. Norbisrath, J. H., "Statoil (aka Equinor), Dielectric permeability logging," SPWLA 59th Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-2018-J, June 2-6, 2018.

12. Bondarenko, A., V. Dorovsky, Yu. Perepechko, and N. Velker, "Dielectric permittivity dispersion measurements in downhole conditions - Effect on porosity measurements," SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, SPE-176603-MS, Moscow, Russia, October 26-28, 2015.

13. Xing, G., H. Wang, and Z. Ding, "Adaptive dual-parameter deconvolution for high-frequency electromagnetic-wave logging," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 48, No. 12, 4178-4183, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2051552

14. Liu, S. X. and M. T. Y. K. Sato, "Numerical and experimental study on multi-frequency electromagnetic well logging," Well Logging Technology, 278-282, 2003.

15. Kang, G. J., D. B. Fang, and S. F. Zhao, "Experiment method and technique physical modeling of multi-frequent electromagnetic logging," Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), Vol. 32, No. 4, 382-385, 2002.

16. Ph. Poley, J., J. J. Nooteboom, and P. J. de Waal, "Use of VHF dielectric measurements for borehole formation analysis," Log Analyst, Vol. 19, No. 3, 8-30, 1978.

17. Glinskikh, V. N., M. N. Nikitenko, and M. I. Epov, "Processing high-frequency electromagnetic logs from conducting formations: Linearized 2D forward and inverse solutions with regard to eddy currents," Russian Geology and Geophysics, Vol. 54, 1515-1521, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.rgg.2013.10.016

18. Chew, W. C., "Modeling of the dielectric logging tool at high frequencies: Theory," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 26, No. 4, 382-387, 1988.
doi:10.1109/36.3041

19. Dunn, J. M., "Lateral wave propagation in a three-layered medium," Radio Science, Vol. 21, 787-796, 1986.
doi:10.1029/RS021i005p00787

20. Weilan, T., "Time domain electromagnetic field computation with finite difference methods," International Journal of Numerical Modeling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, Vol. 9, 293-319, 1996.

21. Graves, R., "Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 86, No. 4, 1091-1106, 1996.

22. Hirtenfelder, F., T. Lopetegi, M. Sorolla, and L. Sassi, "Designing components containing photonic bandgap structures using time domain field solvers," Microwave Engineering, 23-29, 2002.

23. Chieslar, J. D., "A meshing technique for large scale modeling of solution mines in salt and potash," The 55th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, June 20-23, 2021.

24. Guo, H., H. Zhang, and G. Li, "Prediction of water saturation for tight sandstone reservoirs by using array dielectric logging ADL," The SPE Gas & Oil Technology Showcase and Conference, Dubai, UAE, October 21-23, 2019.

25. Li, C., S. Deng, Z. Li, Y. Fan, J. Zhang, and J. Yang, "Application of high-frequency dielectric logging technology for shale oil production," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 100, 53-61, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERL21081403