Vol. 111
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2022-06-19
A Novel Radar Waveform Design for Suppressing Autocorrelation Side-Lobe Based on Chaotic and Single Fusion Encoding Method
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 111, 77-88, 2022
Abstract
Multi-carrier Phase Coded (MCPC) signal has the advantages of large time-bandwidth product, low intercept, anti-jamming, digitization, flexible waveform, and high spectral utilization, and has become a hotspot in radar waveform research. However, MCPC signal has high-distance sidelobes which are difficult to suppress, after pulse compression processing. Excessive sidelobes will mask the existence of small and weak targets, thus losing the target signal, which limits the practical application of MCPC signals. Therefore, it is of great significance and practical value to study the sidelobe suppression of MCPC signals. From the point of view of waveform design, a multi-carrier phase-encoded signal combining chaotic encoding and single encoding (MCPC-CS) is designed by using chaotic sequence as phase encoding of MCPC signal and optimizing it. In this paper, peak sidelobe level ratio (PSLR) is used as a evaluation factor of the autocorrelation function. The simulation results show that MCPC-CS signal has a good autocorrelation peak sidelobe level ratio, and the autocorrelation sidelobe is reduced by more than 3 dB compared with the normal MCPC signal.
Citation
Ji Li, Min Liu, Jianping Ou, and Wei Wang, "A Novel Radar Waveform Design for Suppressing Autocorrelation Side-Lobe Based on Chaotic and Single Fusion Encoding Method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 111, 77-88, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM22042202
References

1. Richards, M. A., Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2005.

2. Raghavendra, C. G., R. Prakash, and V. N. Panemangalore, "Reduction of sidelobe levels in multicarrier radar signals via the fusion of hill patterns and geometric progression," ETRI Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4, 650-659, 2021.
doi:10.4218/etrij.2020-0158

3. Argenti, F. and L. Facheris, "Radar pulse compression methods based on nonlinear and quadratic optimization," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 59, No. 5, 3904-3916, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2020.3010414

4. Kretschmer, F. F. and B. L. Lewis, "Doppler properties of polyphase coded pulse compression waveforms," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, 521-531, 1983.
doi:10.1109/TAES.1983.309340

5. Neuberger, N. and R. Vehmas, "Range sidelobe levelreduction with a train of diverse LFM pulses," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1480-1486, 2022.
doi:10.1109/TAES.2021.3115991

6. Di, Z., X. Dong, and W. Lin, "Pulse compression with very low sidelobes in a spaceborne weather radar," International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Vol. 1, No. 5, V252-V255, 2008.

7. Wang, H., Z. Shi, and J. He, "Compression withconsiderable sidelobe suppression effect in weather radar," Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, No. 97, 2013.

8. Sen, S. and C. W. Glover, "Optimal multicarrier phase-coded waveform design for detection of extended targets," IEEE Radar Conference, 1-6, 2013.

9. Levanon, N., "Multifrequency complementary phase-coded radar signal," IEE Proceedings --- Radar, Sonar and Navigation, Vol. 147, No. 6, 276-284, 2000.
doi:10.1049/ip-rsn:20000734

10. Huang, Q., Y. Li, W. Cheng, W. Liu, and B. Li, "A new multicarrier chaotic phase coded stepped- frequency pulse train radar signal and its characteristic analysis," 2015 IEEE 10th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 444-448, 2015.

11. Li, D., X. Dai, and H. Zhang, "Sidelobe suppression in NC-OFDM systems using constellation adjustment," IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 13, No. 5, 327-329, 2009.
doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2009.090031

12. Yang, Z. and J. Tao, "Active point modification for sidelobe suppression with PAPR constraint in OFDM systems," Wireless Networks, Vol. 19, No. 7, 1653-1663, 2013.
doi:10.1007/s11276-013-0561-5

13. Khan, H. and S. Yoo, "Active interference restriction in OFDM based cognitive radio using genetic algorithm," 2015 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 840-842, 2015.
doi:10.1109/ICTC.2015.7354680

14. Tom, A., A. Sahin, and H. Arslan, "Suppressing alignment: Joint PAPR and out-of-band power leakage reduction for OFDM-based systems," IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 64, No. 3, 1100-1109, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2512603

15. Prasantha, H. S., "Joint reduction of PMEPR and sidelobe in multicarrier radar signals using ZC and SC method," WSEAS Transactions on Communications, Vol. 19, 9-17, 2020.

16. Sivadas, N. A. and S. S. Mohammed, "A joint technique for sidelobe suppression and peak to average power ratio reduction in noncontiguous OFDM based cognitive radio networks," International Journal of Electronics, Vol. 104, No. 2, 190-203, 2016.
doi:10.1080/00207217.2016.1196747

17. Ni, C., T. Jiang, and W. Peng, "Joint PAPR reduction and sidelobe suppression using signal cancelation in NC-OFDM-based cognitive radio systems," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 64, No. 3, 964-972, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TVT.2014.2327012

18. Carroll, L. T., "Adaptive chaotic maps for identification of complex targets," IET Radar Sonar and Navigation, Vol. 2, No. 4, 256-262, 2008.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn:20070128

19. Huang, Y. L. and Zeng, "Design and characteristic analysis of multicarrier chaotic phase coded radar pulse train signal," International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 3, 1-8, 2014.

20. Sun, K., S. He, L. Yin, and L. Duo, "Application of the fuzzyen algorithm to the complexity analysis of chaotic sequences," Acta Physica Sinica, Vol. 61, No. 13, 147-203, Chinese Edition, 1984.

21. Li, J., X. Luo, X. Duan, W. Wang, and J. Ou, "A novel radar waveform design for anti- interrupted sampling repeater jamming via time-frequency random coded method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 98, 89-99, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20072302

22. Li, Z. and W. Zou, "An OFDM radar communication integrated waveform based on chaos," Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems, 555-562, 2021.
doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8411-4_75

23. Guruswamy, A. and R. Blum, "Ambiguity optimization for frequency-hopping waveforms in MIMO radars with arbitrary antenna separations," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 23, No. 9, 1231-1235, 2016.
doi:10.1109/LSP.2016.2569121

24. Ipanov, R. N., "Polyphase radar signals with ZACZ based on p-Pairs D-Code sequences and their compression algorithm," Infocommunications Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, 21-27, 2019.
doi:10.36244/ICJ.2019.3.4

25. Yu, M., S. Dong, X. Duan, and S. Liu, "A novel interference suppression method for interrupted sampling repeater jamming based on singular spectrum entropy function," Sensors, Vol. 19, No. 1, 136, 2019.
doi:10.3390/s19010136

26. Wu, W., J. Zou, C. Jian, S. Xu, and Z. Chen, "False-target recognition against interrupted-sampling repeater jamming based on integration decomposition," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2979-2991, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TAES.2021.3068443

27. Raghavendra, C. G., N. Harsha, and N. N. S. S. R. K. Prasad, "Sidelobe reduction of multicarrier radar signals using Zad-Off Chu polyphase sequence," International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications, 1057-1061, 2018.