Progress In Electromagnetics Research
ISSN: 1070-4698, E-ISSN: 1559-8985
Home | Search | Notification | Authors | Submission | PIERS Home | EM Academy
Home > Vol. 69 > pp. 341-359


By M. Ali and S. Sanyal

Full Article PDF (211 KB)

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) is becoming a crucial issue in the era of modern electronic systems. For EMI measurement, it is required to place a sensor to receive the radiation from the equipment in a suitable test environment. The performance of the sensor depends on its Antenna Factor, which is the ratio of the incident electric field on the antenna surface to the received voltage at the load end across 50Ω resistance. FDTD is one of the efficient numerical techniques to solve radiation and scattering problem in any environments. To the best of the knowledge of the authors no literature is available where FDTD is used to evaluate the Antenna Factor. Here, in this work we applied FDTD to predict the performance of dipole antenna when it is used as a EMI sensor. The results presented here for free space environment are compared with published results.

Citation: (See works that cites this article)
M. Ali and S. Sanyal, "FDTD Analysis of Dipole Antenna as EMI Sensor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 69, 341-359, 2007.

1. Paul, C. R., Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, Wiley Series in Microwave and Optical Engineering, Wiley, New York, 1992.

2. Ghosh, S., "Some studies on loaded and unloaded wire antennas as EMI sensors," Ph.D. dissertation, No. 8, 2003.

3. Wang, K. and R. Nelson, Numerical simulation of the antenna factor of a broadband dipole antenna, Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 13-17, 2001.

4. Ghosh, S., A. Chakrabarty, and S. Sanyal, "Loaded wire antenna as EMI sensor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 54, 19-36, 2005.

5. Yee, K. S., "Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwells equations in isotropic media," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 14, No. 3, 302-307, 1966.

6. Sullivan, D. M., Electromagnetic Simulation Using The FDTD Method, IEEE Press, New York, 2000.

7. Taove, A. and M. Brodwin, "Numerical solution of steady-state electromagnetic scattering problems using the time-dependent maxwells equations," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. MTT-23, No. 8, 623630, 1975.

8. Sadiku, M., V. Bemmel, and S. Agbo, Stability criteria for finitedifference time-domain algorithm, Proc. IEEE, No. 4, 48-50, 1990.

9. Taove, A. and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electromagnetic— The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, Artech House, Boston, London, 2005.

10. Sullivan, D. M., "A simplified PML for use with the FDTD method," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 2, 1996.

11. Sullivan, D. M., "An unsplit step 3-d PML for use with the FDTD method," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 2, 184-186, 1997.

12. Yu, W. and R. Mittra, Conformal Finite-Difference Time- Domain Maxwells Equations Solver: Software and Users Guide, Artech House, Boston, London, 2004.

13. Das, S. and A. Chakrabarty, "A novel modeling technique to solve a class of rectangular waveguide based circuits and radiators," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 61, 231-252, 2006.

14. Bhattacharya, A., S. Gupta, and A. Chakraborty, "Analysis of rectangular waveguide and thick windows as EMI sensors," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 22, 231-258, 1999.

15. Ghosh, S. and A. Chakrabarty, "Performance analysis of EMI sensor in different test sites with different wave impedances," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 62, 127-142, 2006.

16. Instruction Manual, Dipole Antenna MP651A/B, Dipole Antenna MP651A/B, Anritsu Corp.

17. Ghosh, S. and A. Chakrabarty, "Estimation of equivalent circuit of loaded trans-receive antenna system and its time domain studies," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 20, 89-103, 2006.

© Copyright 2014 EMW Publishing. All Rights Reserved