volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

We prove a theorem on the magnetic energy minimum in a system of perfect, or ideal, conductors. It is analogous to Thomson's theorem on the equilibrium electric field and charge distribution in a system of conductors. We first prove Thomson's theorem using a variational principle. Our new theorem is then derived by similar methods. We find that magnetic energy is minimized when the current distribution is a surface current density with zero interior magnetic field; perfect conductors are perfectly diamagnetic. The results agree with currents in superconductors being confined near the surface. The theorem implies a generalized force that expels current and magnetic field from the interior of a conductor that loses its resistivity. Examples of solutions that obey the theorem are presented.

1. Carr, Jr., W. J., "Macroscopic theory of superconductors," Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 23, 3208-3212, 1981.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.23.3208 Google Scholar

2. Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics, 3 Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.

3. Coulson, C. A., Electricity, 3 Ed., Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1953.

4. Panofsky, W. K. H. and M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, 2 Ed., Dover, New York, 2005.

5. Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2 Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1984.

6. Bakhoum, E. G., "Proof of Thomson's theorem of electrostatics," J. Electrostatics, Vol. 66, 561-563, 2008.
doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2008.06.002 Google Scholar

7. Kovetz, A., Electromagnetic Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.

8. Sancho, M., J. L. Sebastián, and V. Giner, "Distribution of charges on conductors and Thomson's theorem," Eng. Sci. Educ. J., Vol. 10, 26-30, 2001.
doi:10.1049/esej:20010104 Google Scholar

9. Donolato, C., "An application of Thomson's theorem to the determination of induced charge density," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 24, L1-L4, 2003.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/24/3/101 Google Scholar

10. Brito, L. and M. Fiolhais, "Energetics of charge distributions," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 23, 427-431, 2002.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/23/4/306 Google Scholar

11. Sancho, M., J. L. Sebastián, S. Muñoz, and J. M. Miranda, "Computational method in electrostatics based on monte carlo energy minimization," IEE Proc., Sci. Meas. Technol., Vol. 148, 121-124, 2009.
doi:10.1049/ip-smt:20010449 Google Scholar

12. Karlsson, P. W., "Inductance inequalities for ideal conductors," Arch. f. Elektrotech., Vol. 67, 29-33, 1984.
doi:10.1007/BF01574728 Google Scholar

13. Badía-Majós, A., "Understanding stable levitation of super-conductors from intermediate electromagnetics," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 74, 1136-1142, 2006.
doi:10.1119/1.2338548 Google Scholar

14. McAllister, I. W., "Surface current density K: An introduction," IEEE Trans. Elect. Insul., Vol. 26, 416-417, 1991.
doi:10.1109/14.85112 Google Scholar

15. Dolecek, R. L. and J. de Launay, "Conservation of flux by a superconducting torus," Phys. Rev., Vol. 78, 58-60, 1950.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.78.58 Google Scholar

16. Hehl, F. W. and Y. N. Obukhov, "Dimensions and units in electrodynamics," Gen. Relativ. Gravit., Vol. 37, 733-749, USA, 2005.
doi:10.1007/s10714-005-0059-2 Google Scholar

17. Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 4 Ed., Pergamon, Oxford, 1975.

18. London, F. and H. London, "The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor," Proc. Roy. Soc. A, Vol. 149, 71-88, 1935.
doi:10.1098/rspa.1935.0048 Google Scholar

19. Badía-Majós, A., J. F. Cariñena, and C. López "Geometric treatment of electromagnetic phenomena in conducting materials: variational principles," J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 39, 14699-14726, 2006.
doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/47/013 Google Scholar

20. Woltjer, L., "A theorem on force-free magnetic fields," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Vol. 44, 489-491, 1958.
doi:10.1073/pnas.44.6.489 Google Scholar

21. Griffiths, D. J., Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3 Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1999.

22. Meissner, W. and R. Ochsenfeld, "Ein neuer Effekt bei eintritt der Supraleitfähigkeit," Naturwiss., Vol. 21, 787-788, 1933.
doi:10.1007/BF01504252 Google Scholar

23. Hirsch, J. E., "Charge expulsion, spin Meissner effect, and charge inhomogeneity in superconductors," J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., Vol. 22, 131-139, 2009.
doi:10.1007/s10948-008-0381-5 Google Scholar

24. Forrest, A. M., "Meissner and Ochsenfeld revisited," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 4, 117-120, 1983, Comments on and translation into English of Meissner and Ochsenfeld.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/4/2/011 Google Scholar

25. Alfvén, H. and C.-G. Fälthammar, Cosmical Electrodynamics, 2 Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1963.

26. Essén, H, "From least action in electrodynamics to magnetomechanical energy," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 30, 515-539, 2009.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/30/3/009 Google Scholar

27. Gorter, C. J. and H. Casimir, "On supraconductivity I," Physica, Vol. 1, 306-320, 1934.
doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(34)90037-9 Google Scholar

28. Essén, H., "Magnetic fields, rotating atoms, and the origin of diamagnetism," Phys. Scr., Vol. 40, 761-767, 1989.
doi:10.1088/0031-8949/40/6/012 Google Scholar

29. Essén, H., "Darwin magnetic interaction energy and its macroscopic consequences," Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 53, 5228-5239, 1996.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5228 Google Scholar

30. Essén, H., "Magnetic dynamics of simple collective modes in a two-sphere plasma model," Phys. of Plasmas, Vol. 12, 122101-1-7, 2005. Google Scholar

31. Essén, H., "Electrodynamic model connecting superconductor response to magnetic field and to rotation," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 26, 279-285, 2005.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/26/2/007 Google Scholar

32. Greiner, W., Classical Electrodynamics, Springer, New York, 1998.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0587-6

33. Fock, V., "Skineffekt in einem Ringe," Phys. Z. Sowjetunion, Vol. 1, 215-236, 1932. Google Scholar

34. De Launay, J., "Electrodynamics of a superconducting torus,", Technical Report NRL-3441, Naval Research Lab, Washington DC, 1949. Google Scholar

35. Carter, G. W., S. C. Loh, and C. Y. K. Po, "The magnetic field of systems of currents circulating in a conducting ring," Quart. Journ. Mech. and Applied Math., Vol. 18, 87-106, 1965.
doi:10.1093/qjmam/18.1.87 Google Scholar

36. Bhadra, D., "Field due to current in toroidal geometry," Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 39, 1536-1546, 1968.
doi:10.1063/1.1683157 Google Scholar

37. Haas, H., "Das Magnetfeld eines gleichstromdurchflossenen Torus," Arch. f. Elektrotech., Vol. 58, 197-209, 1976.
doi:10.1007/BF01600116 Google Scholar

38. Belevitch, V. and J. Boersma, "Some electrical problems for a torus," Philips J. Res., Vol. 38, 79-137, 1983. Google Scholar

39. Ivaska, V., V. Jonkus, and V. Palenskis, "Magnetic field distribution around a superconducting torus," Physica C, Vol. 319, 79-86, 1999.
doi:10.1016/S0921-4534(99)00279-8 Google Scholar

40. Zhilichev, Y. N., "Superconducting cylinder in a static transverse magnetic field," IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., Vol. 7, 3874-3879, 1997.
doi:10.1109/77.659441 Google Scholar

41. Matute, E. A., "On the superconducting sphere in an external magnetic field," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 67, 786-788, 1999.
doi:10.1119/1.19126 Google Scholar

Dr. Miguel C. N. Fiolhais

Prof. Hanno Essén

Dr. Constanca Providencia

Dr. Arne B. Nordmark