Vol. 64
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2015-12-09
Speeding Beyond FDTD, Perforated Finite Element Time Domain Method for 3D Electromagnetics
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 64, 171-193, 2015
Abstract
A three-dimensional (3D) time domain approach can be particularly valuable for the analysis of many different types of practical structures. In this regard, the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method is a popular technique, being used successfully to analyze the electromagnetic properties of many structures, including a range of optical or photonic devices. This FDTD method offers several major advantages: a minimum level of calculation is required for each of the cells into which the structure is divided, as well as data parallelism and explicit and easy implementation: however, the use of a cuboid grid makes the method very resource intensive for large simulations, especially those in 3D. Although the finite element (FE) approach is superior for the discretization of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D structures, most of the FE-based time domain approaches reported so far suffer from limitations due to the implicit or iterative form or the mass matrix formulation, for example. This paper presents an FE based time domain technique for 3D structures which uses a unique perforated mesh system. It calculated the numerical dispersion characteristics for the FDTD and the proposed method and compared. This paper finally discusses how to utilize the improved numerical dispersion characteristics of the proposed method to increase the simulation speed beyond the FDTD 3D method by using Intel micro-processors.
Citation
S M Raiyan Kabir, B. M. Azizur Rahman, and Ken Thomas Victor Grattan, "Speeding Beyond FDTD, Perforated Finite Element Time Domain Method for 3D Electromagnetics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 64, 171-193, 2015.
doi:10.2528/PIERB15081902
References

1. Hagness, S. and A. Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (Second Edition), 2 Ed., Artech House, 2000.

2. Taflove, A. and M. Brodwin, "Numerical solution of steady-state electromagnetic scattering problems using the time-dependent Maxwell's equations," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 23, No. 8, 623-630, 1975.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.1975.1128640

3. Sun, G. and C. Trueman, "Some fundamental characteristics of the one-dimensional alternate-direction-implicit finite-difference time-domain method," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 52, No. 1, 46-52, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2003.821230

4. Lee, J., R. Lee, and A. Cangellaris, "Time-domain finite-element methods," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 45, No. 3, 430-442, 1997.
doi:10.1109/8.558658

5. Yee, K., "Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 14, No. 3, 302-307, 1966.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693

6. Gedney, S. and U. Navsariwala, "An unconditionally stable finite element time-domain solution of the vector wave equation," IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, Vol. 5, No. 10, 332-334, 1995.
doi:10.1109/75.465046

7. Cangellaris, A., C. Lin, and K. Mei, "Point-matched time domain finite element methods for electromagnetic radiation and scattering," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 35, No. 10, 1160-1173, 1987.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1987.1143981

8. Hesthaven, T. W. J. S., "High-order/spectral methods on unstructured grids i. Time-domain solution of Maxwell's equations,", Tech. Rep. 2001-6, ICASE NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, March 2001.

9. Songoro, H., M. Vogel, and Z. Cendes, "Keeping time with Maxwell's equations," IEEE Microwave Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 2, 42-49, 2010.
doi:10.1109/MMM.2010.935779

10. Raiyan Kabir, S. M., B. M. A. Rahman, A. Agrawal, and K. T. V. Grattan, "Elimination of numerical dispersion from electromagnetic time domain analysis by using resource efficient finite element technique," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 137, 487-512, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIER13012305

11. Courant, R., K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy, "Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der 568 mathematischen physik," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 100, No. 1, 32-74, 1928.
doi:10.1007/BF01448839

12. Cangellaris, A., "Time-domain finite methods for electromagnetic wave propagation and scattering," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 27, No. 5, 3780-3785, 1991.
doi:10.1109/20.104926

13. Leung, D., N. Kejalakshmy, B. M. A. Rahman, and K. Grattan, "Rigorous modal analysis of silicon strip nanoscale waveguides," Optics Express, Vol. 18, No. 8, 8528-8539, 2010.
doi:10.1364/OE.18.008528

14. Kirby, E., J. Hamm, K. Tsakmakidis, and O. Hess, "FDTD analysis of slow light propagation in negative-refractive-index metamaterial waveguides," Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, Vol. 11, No. 11, 114027, 2009.
doi:10.1088/1464-4258/11/11/114027

15. Rahman, B. M. A. and J. B. Davies, "Finite-element solution of integrated optical waveguides," Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 2, No. 5, 682-688, 1984.
doi:10.1109/JLT.1984.1073669

16. Rahman, B. M. A. and J. B. Davies, "Finite-element analysis of optical and microwave waveguide problems," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 32, No. 1, 20-28, 1984.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.1984.1132606

17. Themistos, C. and B. M. A. Rahman, "Design issues of a multimode interference-based 3-dB splitter," Applied Optics, Vol. 41, No. 33, 7037-7044, 2002.
doi:10.1364/AO.41.007037

18. Juntunen, J. and T. Tsiboukis, "Reduction of numerical dispersion in FDTD method through artificial anisotropy," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 48, No. 4, 582-588, 2000.
doi:10.1109/22.842030

19. Intel Corporation Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Optimization Reference Manual, 2014.

20. Jamieson, L. H., P. T. Mueller, and H. J. Siegel, "FFT algorithms for simd parallel processing systems," Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Vol. 3, No. 1, 48-71, 1986.
doi:10.1016/0743-7315(86)90027-4

21. Agaian, S. and D. Gevorkian, "Synthesis of a class of orthogonal transforms. Parallel simd-algorithms and specialized processors," Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 4, 394-408, 1992.

22. Ben-Asher, Y., D. Egozi, and A. Schuster, "2-D simd algorithms for perfect shuffle networks," Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Vol. 16, No. 3, 250-257, 1992.
doi:10.1016/0743-7315(92)90036-M

23. Apostolakis, J., P. Coddington, and E. Marinari, "New simd algorithms for cluster labeling on parallel computers," International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 4, No. 4, 749-763, 1993.
doi:10.1142/S0129183193000628

24. Chen, H., N. S. Flann, and D. W. Watson, "Parallel genetic simulated annealing: A massively parallel simd algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 9, No. 2, 126-136, 1998.
doi:10.1109/71.663870

25. Hong, I., S. Chung, H. Kim, Y. Kim, Y. Son, and Z. Cho, "Ultra fast symmetry and simd-based projection-backprojection (ssp) algorithm for 3-D pet image reconstruction," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 26, No. 6, 789-803, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.892644

26. Goualard, F., "Fast and correct simd algorithms for interval arithmetic," PARA'08, Springer, 2010.

27. Berenger, J., "A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 114, No. 2, 185-200, 1994.
doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1159

28. Berenger, J., "Perfectly matched layer for the FDTD solution of wave-structure interaction problems," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 44, No. 1, 110-117, 1996.
doi:10.1109/8.477535