Progress In Electromagnetics Research M
ISSN: 1937-8726
Home | Search | Notification | Authors | Submission | PIERS Home | EM Academy
Home > Vol. 29 > pp. 121-136


By R. Stara, N. Fontana, G. Tiberi, A. Monorchio, G. Manara, M. Alfonsetti, A. Galante, A. Vitacolonna, M. Alecci, A. Retico, and M. Tosetti

Full Article PDF (395 KB)

Numerical methods based on solutions of Maxwell's equations are usually adopted for the electromagnetic characterization of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Radiofrequency (RF) coils. In this context, many different numerical methods can be employed, including time domain methods, e.g. the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD), and frequency domain methods, e.g. the Finite Element Methods (FEM) and the Method of Moments (MoM). We provide a quantitative comparison of performances and a detailed evaluation of advantages and limitations of the aforementioned methods in the context of RF coil design for MR applications. Specifically, we analyzed three RF coils which are representative of current geometries for clinical applications: a 1.5 T proton surface coil; a 7 T dual tuned surface coil; a 7 T proton volume coil. The numerical simulation results have been compared with measurements, with excellent agreement in almost every case. However, the three methods differ in terms of required computing resources (memory and simulation time) as well as their ability to handle a realistic phantom model. For this reason, this work could provide "a guide to select the most suitable method for each specific research and clinical applications at low and high field".

R. Stara, N. Fontana, G. Tiberi, A. Monorchio, G. Manara, M. Alfonsetti, A. Galante, A. Vitacolonna, M. Alecci, A. Retico, and M. Tosetti, "Validation of Numerical Approaches for Electromagnetic Characterization of Magnetic Resonance Radiofrequency Coils," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 29, 121-136, 2013.

1. Hayes, , C. E., W. A. Edelstein, J. F. Schenk, O. M. Mueller, and M. Eash, "An efficient, highly homogeneous radiofrequency coil for whole-body NMR imaging at 1.5 T," J. Magn. Reson., Vol. 63, 622-628, 1985.

2. Tropp, J., "The theory of the birdcage resonator," J. Magn. Reson., Vol. 82, 51-62, 1989.

3. Vaughan, J. T., H. P. Hetherington, J. O. Out, J. W. Pan, and G. M. Pohost, "High frequency volume coils for NMR imaging and spectroscopy," Magn. Reson. Med., Vol. 32, 622-628, 1994.

4. Alfonsetti, M., T. Mazza, and M. Alecci, "Optimization of multi-element transverse field radio frequency surface coils," Magn. Reson. Mater. Phy., Vol. 17, No. 53, 2006.

5. Alfonsetti, M., V. Clementi, S. Iotti, G. Placidi, R. Lodi, B. Barbiroli, A. Sotgiu, and M. Alecci, "Versatile coil design and positioning of transverse-field RF surface coils for clinical 1.5T MRI applications," MAGMA, Vol. 18, 69-75, 2005.

6. Alecci, M., S. Romanzetti, J. Kaffanke, A. Celik, H. P. Wegener, and N. J. Shah, "Practical design of a 4Tesla double-tuned RF surface coil for interleaved 1H and 23Na MRI of rat brain," J. Magn. Reson., Vol. 181, No. 2, 203-211, 2006.

7. Tropp, J., "Image brightening in samples of high dielectric constant," Magn. Reson. Med., Vol. 167, 12-24, 2004.

8. Alecci, M., C. M. Collins, M. B. Smith, and P. Jezzard, "Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: Experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 2, 379-385, 2001.

9. Jin, J. M., "Electromagnetics in magnetic resonance imaging," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 40, No. 6, 7-22, 1998.

10. Collins, C. M., S. Li, and M. B. Smith, "SAR and RF field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil," Magn. Reson. Med., Vol. 40, 847-856, 1998.

11. Chen, , J., Z. Fenga, and J. M. Jin, "Numerical simulation of SAR and B1-field inhomogeneity of shielded RF coils loaded with the human head," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 45, No. 5, 650-659, 1998.

12. Ibrahim, T. S., R. Lee, B. A. Baertlein, A. Kangarlu, and P. M. L. Robitaille, "On the physical feasibility of achieving linear polarization at high field: A study of the birdcage coil," Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med., Vol. 1, 2058, 1999.

13. Ibrahim, T. S., "Ultrahigh-field MRI whole-slice and localized RF field excitations using the same RF transmit array," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 25, No. 10, 1341-1347, 2006.

14. Simunic, D., P. Wach, W. Renhart, and R. Stollberg, "Spatial distribution of high-frequency electromagnetic energy in human head during MRI: Numerical results and measurements," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 43, No. 1, 88-94, 1906.

15. Singerman, R. W., T. J. Denison, H. Wen, and R. S. Balaban, "Simulation of B1 field distribution and intrinsic signal-to-noise in cardiac MRI as a function of static magnetic field," J. Magn. Reson., Vol. 125, 78-83, 1997.

16. Mohsin, S. A., "A simple EM model for determining the scattered magnetic resonance radiofrequency field of an implanted medical device," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 14, 1-14, 2010.

17. Fuijita, H., L. S. Petropoulus, M. A. Morich, S. M. Shvartsman, and R. W. Brown, "A hybrid inverse approach applied to the design of lumped-element RF coils," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 46, No. 3, 353-361, 1999.

18. Rogovich, A., A. Monorchio, P. Nepa, G. Manara, G. Giovannetti, and L. Landini, "Design of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) RF coils by using the method of moments," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 1, 950-953, 2004.

19. Attardo, E. A., T. Isernia, and G. Vecchi, "Field synthesis in inhomogeneous media: Joint control of polarization, uniformity and SAR in MRI B1-field," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 118, 355-377, 2011.

20. Yau, D. and S. Crozier, "A genetic algorithm/method of moments approach to the optimization of an RF coil for MRI applications --- Theoretical considerations," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 39, 177-192, 2003.

21. Collins, C. M., "Numerical field calculations considering the human subject for engineering and safety assurance in MRI," NMR Biomed, Vol. 22, 919-926, 2009.

22. Hartwig, V., N. Vanello, G. Giovannetti, D. De Marchi, M. Lombardi, L. Landini, and M. F. Santarelli, "B1+/actual flip angle and reception sensitivity mapping methods: Simulation and comparison," Magn. Reson. Imaging, Vol. 29, No. 5, 717-722, 2011.

23. Reza, S., S. Vijayakumar, M. Limkeman, F. Huang, and C. Saylor, "SAR simulation and the effect of mode coupling in a birdcage resonator," Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering, Vol. 31B, No. 3, 2007.

24. Weiland, T., "Time domain electromagnetic field computation with finite difference methods," International Journal of Numerical Modeling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, Vol. 9, 295-319, 1995.

25. Yee, K. S., "Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagat., Vol. 14, 302-307, 1966.

26. Peterson, A. F., S. L. Ray, and R. Mittra, "Computational Methods for Electromagnetics," IEEE Press, 1998.

27. Berenger, J. P., "Three-dimensional perfectly matched layer for the absorprtion of electromagnetic waves," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 127, 363-379, 1996.

28. Mispelter, J. , M. Lupu, and A. Briguet, NMR Probeheads for Biophysical and Biomedical Experiments: Theoretical Principles and Practical Guidelines, Imperial College Press, 2006.

© Copyright 2010 EMW Publishing. All Rights Reserved