Vol. 110
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2022-05-06
Research on Random Redundant Multi-Carrier Phase Code Signal Against ISRJ Based on MIMO Radar
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 110, 97-107, 2022
Abstract
For the principle that intermittent sampling and repeater jamming (ISRJ) is obtained by discontinuous sampling of radar signal in time domain, a novel random redundancy (RR) waveform based on multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radar and multi-carrier phase code (MCPC) radar signal is proposed, namely RR-MCPC signal. From the point of waveform design, chaotic sequences are used to encode each chip in time domain for the signal with a multi-carrier phase code multiphase coding structure. Moreover, some chips are randomly arranged with equal amount of redundant coding in time-frequency domain. In MIMO radar, the subcarriers of radar signal are divided into multiple channels for transmission, and then the received signal is processed in each channel. Ensure that the intermittent sampling, whether in time domain or frequency domain, will sample redundant information in a channel. So it cannot match the matched filter. Therefore, the RR processing makes the signal have the characteristics of anti-ISRJ, which can availably restrain the interference of ISRJ false target. The results show that the signal-jamming ratio (SJR) improvement factor of RR-MCPC signal after pulse compression is optimized by 2.47-2.69 dB compared with the multi-carrier phase code signal under the typical parameters expressed in this paper.
Citation
Ji Li, Qian Deng, Jianping Ou, and Wei Wang, "Research on Random Redundant Multi-Carrier Phase Code Signal Against ISRJ Based on MIMO Radar," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 110, 97-107, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21092201
References

1. Majd, M. N., M. Radmard, M. M. Chitgarha, et al. "Diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in MIMO radars," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 691-700, 2017.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0278

2. Xiong, J., W. Q. Wang, C. Cui, et al. "Cognitive FDA-MIMO radar for LPI transmit beamforming," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, Vol. 11, No. 10, 1574-1580, 2017.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0551

3. Feng, D. J., H. M. Tao, Y. Yang, et al. "Jamming de-chirping radar using interrupted-sampling repeater," Science China Information Sciences, Vol. 54, No. 10, 2138-2146, 2011.
doi:10.1007/s11432-011-4431-4

4. Lu, Y. and S. Li, "CFAR detection of DRFM deception jamming based on singular spectrum analysis," 2017 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), 1-6, Xiamen, China, 2017.

5. Zhou, C., Q. Liu, et al. "Parameter estimation and suppression for DRFM-based interrupted sampling repeater jammer," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 56-63, 2018.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0114

6. Hao, H., M. Pan, S. Gong, et al. "Estimating and calibrating the response of multiple wideband digital radio frequency memories in a hardware-in-the-loop system using shuffled frog leaping algorithm," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, Vol. 10, No. 5, 827-833, 2016.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0242

7. Zhong, S., X. Huang, H. Wang, et al. "Anti-intermittent sampling repeater jamming waveform design based on immune genetics," 2019 IEEE International Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems (ICPICS), 553-559, Shenyang, China, 2019.

8. Zhou, C., Z. Tang, Z. Zhu, et al. "Anti-interrupted sampling repeater jamming waveform design method," Dianzi Yu Xinxi Xuebao/Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, Vol. 40, No. 9, 2198-2205, 2018.

9. Yu, M., S. Dong, X. Duan, et al. "A novel interference suppression method for interrupted sampling repeater jamming based on singular spectrum entropy function," Sensors, Vol. 19, No. 1, 136-157, 2019.
doi:10.3390/s19010136

10. Chen, J., S. Xu, J. Zou, et al. "Interrupted-sampling repeater jamming suppression based on stacked bidirectional gated recurrent unit network and infinite training," IEEE Access, 107428-107437, 2019.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932793

11. Zhou, K., D. Li, Y. Su, et al. "Joint design of transmit waveform and mismatch filter in the presence of interrupted sampling repeater jamming," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 27, 1610-1614, 2020.
doi:10.1109/LSP.2020.3021667

12. Ren, Z., M. Jiang, and L. Zhang, "Orthogonal phase-frequency coded signal in a pulse against interrupted sampling repeater jamming," The Journal of Engineering, 7573-7576, 2019.
doi:10.1049/joe.2019.0500

13. Li, J., X. Luo, X. Duan, et al. "A novel radar waveform design for anti-interrupted sampling repeater jamming via time-frequency random coded method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 98, 89-99, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20072302

14. Huan, S., G. Dai, G. Luo, et al. "Bayesian compress sensing based countermeasure scheme against the interrupted sampling repeater jamming," Sensors, Vol. 19, No. 15, 3279-3285, 2019.
doi:10.3390/s19153279

15. Wei, Z., L. Zhen, B. Peng, et al. "ECCM scheme against interrupted sampling repeater jammer based on parameter-adjusted waveform design," Sensors, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1141-1157, 2018.
doi:10.3390/s18041141

16. Zhang, J., M. U. Huqiang, S. Wen, et al. "Anti interrupted-sampling repeater jamming method based on stepped LFM waveform," Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019.

17. Liu, Q. L., Z. Liu, Qi-Xiang F.U., et al. "A DRFM-based repeater jammer with interrupted sampling," Radar & Ecm, 2007.

18. Ciuonzo, D., A. Aubry, and V. Carotenuto, "Rician MIMO channel- and jamming-aware decision fusion," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 65, No. 99, 3866-3880, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2017.2686375

19. Devaney, A. J., "Time reversal imaging of obscured targets from multistatic data," IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1600-1610, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2005.846723

20. Ciuonzo, D., G. Romano, and R. Solimene, "Performance analysis of time-reversal MUSIC," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 63, No. 10, 2650-2662, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2015.2417507

21. Chahrour, H., S. Rajan, R. Dansereau, et al. "Hybrid beamforming for interference mitigation in MIMO radar," 2018 IEEE Radar Conference (Radar Conf. 18), 1005-1009, IEEE, Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 2018.

22. Gui, R. and W. Q. Wang, "Constant modulus waveforms with restraining spectral interferences for cognitive MIMO radar," 2017 IEEE Radar Conference (Radar Conf. 17), 0335-0339, IEEE, Seattle, WA, USA, 2017.

23. Chernyak, V., "On signal detection with mainlobe cancellation interference in Multisite Radar Systems and MIMO radars," 2015 European Radar Conference (EuRAD), 137-140, Paris, France, 2015.
doi:10.1109/EuRAD.2015.7346256

24. Aittomaki, T. and V. Koivunen, "Mismatched filter design and interference mitigation for MIMO radars," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 65, No. 2, 454-466, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2016.2620960

25. He, M. and C. Huang, "Self-interference cancellation for full-duplex massive MIMO OFDM with single RF chain," IEEE Wireless Communication Letters, Vol. 99, 26-29, 2019.

26. Fishler, E., A. Haimovich, R. Blum, D. Chizhik, L. Cimini, and R. Valenzuela, "MIMO radar: An idea whose time has come," Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Radar Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37509), 71-78, April 2004, doi: 10.1109/NRC.2004.1316398.

27. Tang, L., Y. Zhu, and Q. Fu, "Designing waveform sets with good correlation and stopband properties for MIMO radar via the gradient-based method," Sensors, 999-1020, 2017.
doi:10.3390/s17050999

28. Deng, H., "Polyphase code design for orthogonal netted radar systems," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Vol. 52, 3126-3135, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2004.836530

29. Yang, Y., R. S. Blum, and Z. S. He, "MIMO radar waveform design via alternating projection," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Vol. 58, 1440-1445, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2009.2033314