Vol. 26
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2012-10-25
A Quasi-Analytical Model for Remote Field Eddy Current Inspection
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 26, 237-249, 2012
Abstract
The Remote Field Eddy Current (RFEC) method is widely used to inspect both ferrous and nonferrous metal tubes when internal access is the only possible way of inspection. An axisymmetric quasi-analytical model is presented in this paper in order to simulate the behavior of a RFEC system during its operation. The proposed model, based on the application of the Fourier Transform in space, is able to take into account the finite length of the excitation coil, fed by an AC current, and the relative movement between the RFEC system and the wall tube. Numerical simulations based on integral formulations and experimental measurements were used to validate the proposed quasi-analytical model.
Citation
Antonino Musolino, Rocco Rizzo, and Ernesto Tripodi, "A Quasi-Analytical Model for Remote Field Eddy Current Inspection," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 26, 237-249, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERM12091108
References

1. Musolino, A., M. Raugi, M. Tucci, and F. Turcu, "Time, wavelet and Hilbert-Huang domain analysis of signals from ultrasonic based equipment for the non destructive evaluation of concrete and brick masonry walls," International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications 2008, Vol. 1, 566-581, Perugia, Jun. 30-Jul. 3, 2008.

2. Mahmoudi, M. and S. Y. Tan, "Depth detection of conducting marine mines via eddy-current and current-channeling response," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 90, 287-307, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09011301

3. Subbarao, G. V. and R. Mulaveesala, "Quadratic frequency modulated thermal wave imaging for non-destructive testing," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 26, 11-22, 2012.

4. Schmidt, T. R., "The remote field eddy current inspection technique," Materials Evaluation, Vol. 42, 225-230, 1984.

5. Atherton, D. L., "Remote field eddy current inspection," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 31, No. 6, 4142-4147, Nov. 1995.
doi:10.1109/20.489888

6. Kobayashi, N., S. Ueno, S. Nagai, M. Ochiai, and N. Jimbo, "Remote field eddy current testing for steam generator inspection of fast reactor," Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 241, No. 12, 4643-4648, Dec. 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.03.054

7. Rebican Investigation of numerical precision of 3-D RFECT signal simulations, M., Z. Chen, N. Yusa, K. Miya, T. Uchimoto, and T. Takagi, IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 41, No. 5, 1968-1971, May 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.846281

8. Duchesne, S., N. Bouzida, and J. P. Villeneuve, "Performance estimation of a remote field eddy current method for the inspection of water distribution pipes," J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage, Vol. 137, No. 6, 521-530, 2011.
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000136

9. Thirunavukkarasu, S., B. P. C. Rao, T. Jayakumar, and B. Raj, "Techniques for processing remote field eddy current signals from bend regions of steam generator tubes of prototype fast breeder reactor ," Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 38, No. 4, 817-824, Apr. 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2010.11.015

10. Atherton, D. L., W. Czura, and D. A. Lowther, "Open-boundary finite element calculations for remote field eddy current systems," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 26, No. 5, 2863-2865, Sep. 1990.
doi:10.1109/20.104898

11. Wang, H., Q. Luo, X.Wang, G. Tian, L. Xing, P.Wang, and Y. Li, "Simulation and experimental study of remote field eddy current Simulation and experimental study of remote field eddy current," Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., Vol. 33, No. 3, 1261-1266, 2010.

12. Di Puccio, F., A. Musolino, R. Rizzo, and E. Tripodi, "A self-controlled maglev system," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 26, 187-203, 2012.

13. Thirunavukkarasu, S., B. P. C. Rao, S. Mahadevan, T. Jayakumar, B. Raj, Z. Zeng, L. Udpa, and S. S. Udpa, "Finite element modeling for detection of localized defects using remote field eddy current technique," Journal of Research in Non destructive Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 3, 145-258, 2009.

14. EFFE v2.00 User Manual, Bathwick Electrical Design Ltd., UK, Sep. 2009.

15. Rizzo, R., N. Sgambelluri, E. P. Scilingo, M. Raugi, and A. Bicchi, "Electromagnetic modeling and design of haptic interface prototypes based on magnetorheological fluids," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 43, No. 9, 3586-3598, Sep. 2007..
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2007.901351

16. Bicchi, A., M. Raugi, R. Rizzo, and N. Sgambelluri, "Analysis and design of an electromagnetic system for the characterization of magneto-rheological fluids for haptic interfaces," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 41, No. 5, 1876-1879, May 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.846280

17. Musolino, A. and R. Rizzo, "Numerical analysis of brush commutation in helical coil electromagnetic launchers," IET Science, Measurement and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4, 147-154, Jul. 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-smt.2010.0098

18. Musolino, A. and R. Rizzo, "Numerical modeling of helical launchers," IEEE Trans. on Plasma Sci., Vol. 39, No. 3, 935-940, Mar. 2011.
doi:10.1109/TPS.2010.2102046

19. Di Puccio, F., R. Bassani, E. Ciulli, A. Musolino, and R. Rizzo, "Permanent magnet bearings: Analysis of plane and axisymmetric V-shaped element design," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 26, 205-223, 2012.

20. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, M. Raugi, and R. Rizzo, "Force and torque evaluation in hybrid FEM-MOM formulations," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 37, No. 5, 3108-3111, Sep. 2001.
doi:10.1109/20.952554

21. Musolino, A., R. Rizzo, E. Tripodi, and M. Toni, "Modeling of electromechanical devices by GPU-accelerated integral formulation," Int. J. Numer. Model., 1-21, Wiley Online Library, wiley-onlinelibrary.com, DOI:10.1002/jnm.1860, 2012.

22. Musolino, A., R. Rizzo, E. Tripodi, and M. Toni, "Acceleration of electromagnetic launchers modeling by using graphic processing unit," IEEE 16th EML Symposium Conference Proceedings,, Vol. 1, 1-6, Beijing, May 15{19, 2012.

23. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, M. Raugi, and R. Rizzo, "Numerical simulation of a complete generator-rail launch system," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 41, No. 1, 369-374, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.839267

24. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, M. Raugi, and R. Rizzo, "Analysis of the performance of a combined coil-rail launcher," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 39, No. 1, 103-107, 2003.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2002.805858

25. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, M. Raugi, R. Rizzo, and M. Tucci, "A wavelet based method for the analysis of impulsive noise due to switch commutations in power line communication (PLC) systems," IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, Vol. 2, No. 1, 80-89, Mar. 2011.
doi:10.1109/TSG.2010.2099135

26. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, R. Rizzo, and M. Tucci, "Multiresolution based sensitivity analysis of complex non-linear circuits," IET Circuits, Devices and Systems, Vol. 6, No. 3, 176-186, 2012.
doi:10.1049/iet-cds.2010.0429

27. Haugland, M., "Fundamental analysis of the remote-field eddy current effect," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 32, No. 4, 3195-3211, 1996.
doi:10.1109/20.508383

28. Musolino, A., R. Rizzo, and E. Tripodi, "Analysis and design criteria of a tubular linear induction motor for a possible use in the electro-magnetic aircraft launch system," IEEE 16th EML Symposium Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, 1-6, Beijing, May 15-19, 2012.

29. Musolino, A., R. Rizzo, and E. Tripodi, "Tubular linear induction machine as a fast actuator: Analysis and design criteria," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 132, 603-619, 2012.

30. Mukerji, S. K., D. S. Srivastava, Y. P. Singh, and D. V. Avasthi, "Eddy current phenomena in laminated structures due to travelling electromagnetic fields," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 18, 159-169, 2011.

31. Musolino, A., R. Rizzo, and E. Tripodi, "Analytical model of a travelling wave multipole field electromagnetic launcher," IEEE 16th EML Symposium Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, 1-6, Beijing, May 15-19, 2012.

32. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, R. Rizzo, and A. Tellini, "Field analysis in axisymmetric actuators," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 36, No. 4, 1906-1909, 2000.
doi:10.1109/20.877819

33. Musolino, A., "Finite-element method/method of moments formulation for the analysis of current distribution in rail launchers," IEEE Trans. Magn.,, Vol. 41, No. 1, 387-392, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.839268

34. Musolino, , A., M. Raugi, and B. Tellini, "3-D field analysis in tubular induction launchers with armature transverse motion," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 35, No. 1, 154-159, 1999.
doi:10.1109/20.738394

35. Barmada, S., A. Musolino, M. Raugi, and R. Rizzo, "Analysis of the performance of a multi-stage pulsed linear induction launcher," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 37, No. 1, 111-115, Jan. 2001.
doi:10.1109/20.911802