Vol. 18
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2009-09-30
Performance Evaluation of the Sequential Track Initiation Schemes with 3D Position and Doppler Velocity Measurements
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 18, 121-148, 2009
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of incorporating Doppler velocity measurements into the most commonly used sequential track initiation schemes, the rule and logic based schemes. The measurement set has been expanded from range and azimuth to include elevation and Doppler velocity. Unlike previous studies, elevation and Doppler measurements have also been included in the analytical evaluation of the false track initiation probability. Performance improvement obtained by employing Doppler measurements has been demonstrated through simulations in terms of false track initiation probability and true track initiation probability. Receiver Operating Characteristics and System Operating Characteristics have also been utilized in performance evaluation. Analytical derivations and simulations have revealed that, using Doppler velocity measurements along with 3D position measurements while initiating tracks in clutter leads to significant decrease in false track initiation probability while providing an acceptable level of true track initiation probability. Simulation results have also showed that inclusion of Doppler measurements has reduced the required time for track initiation, resulting in faster track initiation.
Citation
Faruk Kural, Feza Arikan, Orhan Arikan, and Murat Efe, "Performance Evaluation of the Sequential Track Initiation Schemes with 3D Position and Doppler Velocity Measurements," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 18, 121-148, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERB09072306
References

1. Bar-Shalom, Y., Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques, YBS, 1995.

2. Blackman, D. and R. Popoli, Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems, Artech House, 1999.

3. Shi, Z. G., S. H. Hong, and K. S. Chen, "Tracking airborne targets hidden in blind doppler using current statistical model particle filter," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 82, 227-240, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08012407

4. Zhang, W., Z. G. Shi, S. Du, and K. S. Chen, "Novel roughening method for reentry vehicle tracking using particle filter," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 21, No. 14, 1969-1981, 2007.
doi:10.1163/156939307783152975

5. Bi, S. Z. and X. Y. Ren, "Maneuvering target doppler-bearing tracking with signal time delay using interacting multiple model algorithms," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 87, 15-41, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08091501

6. Turkmen, I. and K. Guney, "Tabu search tracker with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for multiple target tracking," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 65, 169-185, 2006.
doi:10.2528/PIER06090601

7. Haridim, M., H. Matzner, Y. Ben-Ezra, and J. Gavan, "Cooperative targets detection and tracking range maximization using multimode ladar/radar and transponders," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 44, 217-229, 2004.
doi:10.2528/PIER03052001

8. Chen, J. F., Z. G. Shi, S. H. Hong, and K. S. Chen, "Grey prediction based particle filter for maneuvering target tracking," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 93, 237-254, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09042204

9. Leung, H., Z. Hu, and M. Blanchette, "Evaluation of multiple target track initiation techniques in real radar tracking environments," IEE Proceedings of Radar, Sonar, Navigation, Vol. 143, No. 4, 246-253, 1996.
doi:10.1049/ip-rsn:19960404

10. Hu, Z., H. Leung, and M. Blanchette, "Effectiveness of the likelihood function in logic based track formation," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 45, No. 2, 445-456, 1997.
doi:10.1109/78.554308

11. Xue, W. and X. W. Sun, "Multiple targets detection method based on binary hough transform and adaptive time-frequency filtering," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 74, 309-317, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07051406

12. Park, S. H., K. K. Park, J. H. Jung, K. T. Kim, and H. T. Kim, "ISAR imaging of multiple targets using edge detection and hough transform," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 22, No. 2--3, 365-373, 2008.
doi:10.1163/156939308784160622

13. Bar-Shalom, Y., K. C. Chang, and H. M. Shertukde, "Performance evaluation of cascaded logic for track formation in clutter," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 25, No. 6, 873-877, 1989.
doi:10.1109/7.40727

14. Bar-Shalom, Y. and X. Li, "Effectiveness of the likelihood function in logic based track formation," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 27, No. 1, 184-187, 1991.
doi:10.1109/7.68166

15. Chang, K., S. Mori, and C. Chong, "Performance evaluation of track initiation in dense target environment," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 30, No. 1, 213-219, 1994.
doi:10.1109/7.250421

16. Cassassolles, E., M. Ludovic, S. Herve, and B. Tomasini, "Integration of radar measurement attributes in the multiple hypothesis tracker results for track initiation," Proceedings of SPIE, Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets, Vol. 2759, 397-403, 1996.

17. Lacle, L. and J. Driessen, "Velocity-based track discrimination algorithms," IEE Target Tracking: Algorithms and Applications, Vol. 2756, 4.1-4.4, 1996.

18. Fitzgerald, R., "Simple tracking filters: Position and velocity measurements," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 18, 531-537, 1982.
doi:10.1109/TAES.1982.309265

19. Farina, A. and S. Pardini, "Track-while scan algorithm in a clutter environment," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 14, 769-778, 1978.
doi:10.1109/TAES.1978.308628

20. Kural, F. and Y. Ozkazanc, "A method for detecting RGPO/VGPO jamming," IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, 237-240, 2004.
doi:10.1109/SIU.2004.1338303

21. Kural, F., F. Arıkan, O. Arıkan, and M. Efe, "Incorporating doppler velocity measurement for track initiation and maintenance," IEE Seminar on Target Tracking: Algorithms and Applications, 107-114, 2006.

22. Kural, F., "Performance improvement of the multiple target tracking algorithms with the incorporation of doppler velocity measurement,", PhD thesis, Hacettepe University, 2006.

23. Wang, X., D. Musicki, and R. Ellem, "Fast track confirmation for multi-target tracking with doppler measurements," 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, ISSNIP, 263-268, 2007.
doi:10.1109/ISSNIP.2007.4496854

24. Wang, X., D. Musicki, R. Ellem, and F. Fletcher, "Enhanced multi-target tracking with doppler measurements," Information, Decision and Control, IDC, 53-58, 2007.
doi:10.1109/IDC.2007.374525

25. Blair, W., G. Watson, T. Kirubarajan, and Y. Bar-Shalom, "IMMPDAF for radar management and tracking benchmark with ECM," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 44, No. 4, 1115-1134, 1998.

26. Kirubarajan, T., Y. Bar-Shalom, and E. Daeipour, "Adaptive beam pointing control of a phased array radar in the presence of ECM and false alarms using IMMPDAF," Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2616-2620, 1995.

27. Papoulis, A., Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 3 Ed., McGraw-Hill International Editions, 1991.

28. Barton, D., "Modern Radar System Analysis," Artech House, 1988.

29. Hatamzadeh-Varmazyar, S., "Calculating the radar cross section of the resistive targets using the haar wavelets," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 83, 55-80, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08042504

30. Wang, Y. B. and Y. M. Bo, "Fast RCS computation with general asymptotic waveform evaluation," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 21, No. 13, 1873-1884, 2007.

31. Carpentieri, B., "Fast large RCS calculation using the boundary element method," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 21, No. 14, 1959-1968, 2007.
doi:10.1163/156939307783152768

32. Wang, S. G., X. P. Guan, D. W.Wang, X. Y. Ma, and Y. Su, "Fast calculation of wide-band responses of complex radar targets," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 68, 185-196, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER06081702

33. Blair, W. D., G. A. Watson, S. Hoffman, and G. L. Gentry, "Benchmark problem for beam pointing control of phased array radar against maneuvering targets in the presence of ECM and false alarms," Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2601-2605, Seattle, WA, 1995.