Vol. 53
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2013-07-10
MRI Brain Classification Using Texture Features, Fuzzy Weighting and Support Vector Machine
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 53, 73-88, 2013
Abstract
A technique for magnetic resonance brain image classification using perceptual texture features, fuzzy weighting and support vector machines is proposed. In contrast to existing literature which generally classify the magnetic resonance brain images into normal and abnormal classes, classification with in abnormal brain which is relatively hard and challenging problem is addressed here. Texture features along with invariant moments are extracted and the weights are assigned to each feature to increase classification accuracy. Multi-class support vector machine is used for classification purpose. Results demonstrate that the classification accuracy of the proposed scheme is better than the state of the art existing techniques.
Citation
Umer Javed, Muhammad Mohsin Riaz, Abdul Ghafoor, and Tanveer Ahmed Cheema, "MRI Brain Classification Using Texture Features, Fuzzy Weighting and Support Vector Machine," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 53, 73-88, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIERB13052805
References

1. Hakyemez, B., C. Erdogan, N. Bolca, N. Yildirim, G. Gokalp, and M. Parlak, "Evaluation of different cerebral mass lesions by perfusion-weighted MR imaging ," Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 24, No. 4, 817-824, 2006.

2. Lau, P. Y., F. C. T. Voon, and S. Ozawa, "The detection and visualization of brain tumors on T2-weighted MRI images using multiparameter feature blocks," International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 5104-5107, Janurary 17-18, 2006.

3. Zhang, Y., S. Wang, and L. Wu, "A novel method for magnetic resonance brain image classification based on adaptive chaotic PSO," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 109, 325-343, 2010.

4. Zhang, Y., L. Wu, and S. Wang, "Magnetic resonance brain image classification by an improved artificial bee colony algorithm," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 116, 65-79, 2011.

5. Zhang, Y. and L.Wu, "An MR brain images classifier via principal component analysis and kernel support vector machine," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 130, 369-388, 2012.

6. El-Dahshan, E.-S., T. Hosny, and A. M. Salem, "Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification," Digital Signal Processing, Vol. 20, No. 2, 433-441, 2010.

7. Das, S., M. Chowdhury, and M. K. Kundu, "Brain MR image classification using multi-scale geometric analysis of ripplet," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 137, 1-17, 2013.

8. Malthouse, E. C., "Limitations of nonlinear PCA as performed with generic neural networks," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,, Vol. 9, No. 1, 165-173, 1998.

9. Chaplot, S., L. M. Patnaik, and N. R. Jagannathan, "Classification of magnetic resonance brain images using wavelets as input to support vector machine and neural network," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol. 1, No. 1, 86-92, 2006.

10. Yeh, J.-Y. and J. C. Fu, "A hierarchical genetic algorithm for segmentation of multi-spectral human-brain MRI," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1285-1295, 2008.

11. Shelvy, P. T., V. Palanisamy, and T. Purusothaman, "Performance analysis of clustering algorithms in brain tumor detection of MR images," European Journal of Scienti¯c Research, Vol. 62, No. 3, 321-330, 2011.

12. Othman, M. F. and M. A. M. Basri, "Probabilistic neural network for brain tumor classification," International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation, 136-138, January 25-27, 2011.

13. Joshi, D. M., N. K. Rana, and V. M. Misra, "Classification of brain cancer using artificial neural network," International Conference on Electronic Computer Technology, 112-116, May 7-10, 2010.

14. Zacharaki, E. I., S. Wang, S. Chawla, D. S. Yoo, R. Wolf, E. R. Melhem, and C. Davatzikos, "MRI-based classification of brain tumor type and grade using SVM-RFE," IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 1035-1038, June 28-31, 2009.

15. Cortes, C. and V. Vapnik, "Support vector networks," Machine Learning, Vol. 20, No. 3, 273-297, 1995.

16. Hu, M. K., "Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants," IRE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 179-187, 1962.

17. Amadasun, M. and R. King, "Textural features corresponding to textural properties," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1264-1274, 1989.

18. Vapnik, V., The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, USA, 1995.

19. Javed, U., M. M. Riaz, T. A. Cheema, and H. M. F. Zafar, "Detection of lung tumor in CE CT images by using weighted support vector machines ," International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology, 113-116.

20. Horng, M. H., "Multi-class support vector machine for classification of the ultrasonic images of supraspinatus," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 86, No. 4, 8124-8133, 2009.

21. Anand, A. and P. N. Suganthan, "Multiclass cancer classification by support vector machines with class-wise optimized genes and probability estimates," Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 259, No. 3, 533-540, 2009.

22. Hsu, C. W. and C. J. Lin, "A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 13, No. 2, 415-425, March 2002.

23. Rifkin, R. and A. Klautau, "In defense of one-vs-all classification," The Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 5, 101-141, 2004.

24. Yang, W., H. Xia, B. Xia, L. M. Lui, and X. Huang, "ICA-based feature extraction and automatic classification of AD-related MRI data," International Conference on Natural Computation, 1261-1265, August 10-12, 2010.

25. Harvard Medical Atlas Database, http://www.med.harvard.edu/AANLIB/home.html.

26. Arivazhagana, S., L. Ganesanb, and T. G. S. Kumara, "Texture classification using ridgelet transform," Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 27, No. 16, 1875-1883, 2006.

27. Riaz, M. M. and A. Ghafoor, "Principle component analysis and fuzzy logic based through wall image enhancement," Progress In Electromagnetic Research, Vol. 127, 461-478, 2012.

28. Riaz, M. M. and A. Ghafoor, "Spectral and textural weighting using Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system for through wall image enhancement," Progress In Electromagnetic Research B, Vol. 48, 115-130, 2013.