Vol. 14
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2009-03-26
Mutual Coupling Between a Pair of Identical Beam Steering Dielectric Resonator Antennas
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 14, 23-44, 2009
Abstract
A comparative study using numerical models on the mutual coupling (MC) between two different heterogeneous beam steering dielectric resonator antennas (DRAs) and an omni-directional dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) is presented in this paper. The mutual coupling was investigated by varying the separation between the antennas and manipulating the far field radiation pattern of each antenna. Several arrangements with element separation ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 free space wave length were investigated at the design frequency of 10 GHz. Different configurations contributed to different isolation levels. It was found that a significant isolation (< -15 dB) between an array of heterogeneous DRAs can be obtained even with antennas placed in close proximity (0.1 free space wavelength separation). It was also shown that the resonant frequency and return loss are most affected at settings where the direction of the main lobe of antenna A overlaps with the direction of the main lobe of antenna B. The expected inverse proportionality between 'd' (the separation between two antennas) and the level of MC was also demonstrated.
Citation
Hazem Fayad, and Paul Record, "Mutual Coupling Between a Pair of Identical Beam Steering Dielectric Resonator Antennas," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 14, 23-44, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERB09021504
References

1. Chi-Yuk, C., C. Chi-Ho, R. D. Murch, and C. R. Rowell, "Reduction of mutual coupling between closely-packed antenna elements," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 55, 1732-1738, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2007.898618

2. Samii, D. W., M. Manteghi, M. P. Fitz, and Y. Rahmat-Samii, "Experiments with compact antenna arrays for MIMO radio communications," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 54, 3239-3250, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2006.883973

3. Fletcher, P. N., M. Dean, and A. R. Nix, "Mutual coupling in multi-element array antennas and its influence on MIMO channel capacity," Electronics Letters, Vol. 39, 342-344, 2003.
doi:10.1049/el:20030219

4. Gao, Y., X. Chen, and C. G. Parini, "Channel capacity of dual-element modified PIFA array on small mobile terminal," Electronics Letters, Vol. 43, 1060-1062, 2007.
doi:10.1049/el:20071960

5. Rikuta, Y. and H. Arai, "Mutual coupling suppression of two dipole antennas backed by optimized reflector," IEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 2, 276-279, 2002.

6. Fan, Y. and Y. Rahmat-Samii, "Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: A low mutual coupling design for array applications," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 51, 2936-2946, 2003.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.817983

7. Kwai-Man, L., L. Wai-Kee, and L. Kwok-Wa, "Mutual impedance of hemispherical dielectric resonator antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 42, 1652-1654, 1994.
doi:10.1109/8.362806

8. Chair, R., A. A. Kishk, and L. Kai-Fong, "Comparative study on the mutual coupling between different sized cylindrical dielectric resonators antennas and circular microstrip patch antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 53, 1011-1019, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2004.842682

9. Dorris, R. J., R. T. Long, S. A. Long, M. A. A. Khayat, and J. T. A. Williams, "Mutual coupling between cylindrical probefed dielectric resonator antennas," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 1, 8-9, 2002.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2002.802575

10. Fayad, H. and P. Record, "Mechanically steerable fluid dielectric resonator antenna," International Journal of Electronics and Communication, accepted, in press, March 2008.

11. Fayad, H. and P. Record, "Experimental investigation on new steerable dielectric resonator antenna," Electronics Letters, Vol. 43, 1009-1010, 2007.
doi:10.1049/el:20071820

12. Fayad, H. and P. Record, Adaptive Dielectric Resonator Antenna, Antennas and Propagation Conference, Loughborough, LAPC,, 329-332, 2007.
doi:10.1109/LAPC.2007.367496

13. Fayad, H. and P. Record, "Muliti-feed dielectric resonator antenna with reconfigurable radiation pattern," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 76, 341-356, 2007.