2013-01-03
Relativistic Transformation of Magnetic Dipole Moment
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 47, 263-278, 2013
Abstract
We consider three different definitions of magnetic dipole moment for electrically neutral compact bunches of charged particles and show that, in general, they are not equivalent to each other with respect to their relativistic transformation. In particular, we prove that the "configurational" definition of magnetic dipole moment mc = 1/2∫v(r × j)dV (in the common designations) and its definition through generated electromagnetic field ("source" definition ms) or experienced force ("force" definition mf) lead to different relativistic transformations of mc and ms (mf). The results obtained shed light on the available disagreements with respect to relativistic transformation of a magnetic dipole moment, and they can be used in covariant formulation of classical electrodynamics in material media.
Citation
Alexander L. Kholmetskii, Oleg V. Missevitch, and Tolga Yarman, "Relativistic Transformation of Magnetic Dipole Moment," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 47, 263-278, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12110903
References

1. Panofsky, W. K. H. and M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, 1962.

2. Barut, A. O., Electrodynamics and Classical Theory of Fields & Particles, Dover, New York, 1980.

3. Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York, 1998.

4. Vekstein, G. E., "On the electromagnetic force on a moving dipole," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 18, 113, 1997.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/18/2/011        Google Scholar

5. Fischer, G. P., "The electric dipole moment of a moving magnetic dipole," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 39, 1528, 1971.
doi:10.1119/1.1976708        Google Scholar

6. Hnizdo, V., "Magnetic dipole moment of a moving electric dipole," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 80, 645, 2012.
doi:10.1119/1.4712308        Google Scholar

7. Beiser, A., Perspectives of Modern Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.

8. Ohanian, H. C., "What is spin?," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 54, 500, 1986.
doi:10.1119/1.14580        Google Scholar

9. Vaidman, L., "Torque and force on a magnetic dipole," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 58, 978, 1990.
doi:10.1119/1.16260        Google Scholar

10. Kholmetskii, A. L., O. V. Missevitch, and T. Yarman, "Electromagnetic force on a moving dipole," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 32, 873, 2011.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/32/4/003        Google Scholar

11. Feynman, R. P., R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 2nd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1963.

12. Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd Ed., Pergamon Press, New York, 1962.

13. Aharonov, Y., P. Pearle, and L. Vaidman, "Comment on `proposed Aharonov-Casher effect: Another example of Aharonov-Bohm effect arising from a classical lag' ," Phys. Rev., Vol. A37, 4052, 1988.        Google Scholar

14. Kholmetskii, A. L., O. V. Missevitch, and T. Yarman, "Reply to comments on `electromagnetic force on a moving dipole'," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 33, L7, 2012.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/33/1/L03        Google Scholar

15. Møller, C., The Theory of Relativity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973.

16. Kholmetskii, A. L., O. V. Missevitch, and T. Yarman, "Different paths to some fundamental physical laws: Relativistic polarization of a moving magnetic dipole," Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 31, 1233, 2010.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/31/5/022        Google Scholar