2010-05-06
Efficient Electrically Small Oblate Spheroidal and Spherical Antennas in Shells with Negative Permittivity
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 21, 151-170, 2010
Abstract
Electrically small oblate spheroidal and spherical antennas in confocal shells with negative permittivity represent perspective antenna design to combine moderately small size, wide bandwidth, high e±ciency and power of radiation. However, optimization of the antennas performance parameters imposes contradictory restrictions on permittivity of the shells, electrical size of the antennas, shape of the antennas and shells. Simulation results based on method of eigen-functions have shown that the antennas can be tuned on resonance for small magnitudes of negative permittivity of the shells and antiresonance for higher magnitudes. Optimal combination of power and efficiency of radiation of the antenna and the quality factor is obtained in an intermediate range of negative permittivity by combining merits of resonance and antiresonance of the antenna. Antiresonant range of the oblate spheroidal antenna emerges for lower permittivity magnitudes as compared with the spherical antenna. As a result, the optimal size of the shell of oblate spheroidal antenna is comparatively small. However, more gradual emerging of antiresonant properties of the spherical antenna makes spherical design more suitable for higher level of inherent absorption of the shell medium with negative permittivity.
Citation
Oleg B. Vorobyev, "Efficient Electrically Small Oblate Spheroidal and Spherical Antennas in Shells with Negative Permittivity," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 21, 151-170, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERB10031710
References

1. Ziolkowski, R. W. and A. Erentok, "Metamaterial-based efficient electrically small antennas," IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. , Vol. 54, No. 7, 2113-2130, Jul. 2006.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2006.877179        Google Scholar

2. Stuart, H. R. and A. Pidwerbetsky, "Electrically small antenna elements using negative permittivity resonators," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 54, No. 6, 1644-1653, Jun. 2006.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2006.875498        Google Scholar

3. Erentok, A. and R. W. Ziolkowski, "A hybrid optimization method to analyze metamaterial-based electrically small antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 55, 731-741, Mar. 2007.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2007.891553        Google Scholar

4. Erentok, A. and R. W. Ziolkowski, "Metamaterial-inspired efficient electrically small antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 56, 691-7407, Mar. 2008.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2008.916949        Google Scholar

5. Pistolkors, A. A. and V. I. Zimina, "Radiation of a vibrator antenna, enclosed in electron plasma," Questions of Radio Electronics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 3-12, 1963 (in Russian).        Google Scholar

6. Chen, K. M. and C. C. Lin, "Enhanced radiation from a plasmaembedded antenna," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 56, 1595-1597, 1968.
doi:10.1109/PROC.1968.6659        Google Scholar

7. Roslyakov, N. M. and N. A. Tenyakova, "Radiation of plasma-coated prolate spheroidal antenna," Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, Vol. 37, No. 10, 5-14, 1992.        Google Scholar

8. Roslyakov, N. M., N. A. Tenyakova, and O. B. Vorob'ev (Vorobyev), "Radiation of a circular loop antenna enclosed by a magnetodielectric sphere," Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, Vol. 49, No. 10, 1133-1140, 2004.        Google Scholar

9. Huang, M. D. and S. Y. Tan, "Efficient electrically small prolate spheroidal antennas coated with a shell of double-negative metamaterials," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 82, 241-255, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08031604        Google Scholar

10. Bichutskaya, T. I. and G. I. Makarov, "Radiation of an electric dipole from a small plasma spheroid," Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics, Vol. 46, No. 12, 940-947, 2003.
doi:10.1023/B:RAQE.0000029589.54371.24        Google Scholar

11. Bichutskaya, T. I. and G. I. Makarov, "Radiation from a small spheroidal antenna with plasma shell," Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 940-947, 2006.
doi:10.1007/s11141-006-0055-8        Google Scholar

12. Foltz, H. D., J. S. McLean, and G. Crook, "Disk loaded monopoles with parallel strip elements," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 46, 1894-1896, 1998.
doi:10.1109/8.743844        Google Scholar

13. Stratton, J. A., P. M. Morse, L. J. Chu, J. D. C. Little, and F. J. Corbato, "Spheroidal Wave Functions," John Wiley & Sons, New York,1956.        Google Scholar

14. Flammer, C., Spheroidal Wave Functions, Stanford Univ. Press, California, 1957.

15. Komarov, I. V., L. I. Ponomarev, and S. Y. Slavyanov, Spheroidal and Coulomb Spheroidal Functions, Nauka, Moscow, 1976 (in Russian).

16. Li, L.-W., M.-S. Leong, T.-S. Yeo, P.-S. Kooi, and K. Y. Tan, "Computations of spheroidal harmonics with complex argument: A review with an algorithm ," Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 58, No. 5, 6792-6806, Nov. 1998.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.58.6792        Google Scholar

17. Falloon, P. E., P. C. Abbott, and J. B. Wang, "Theory and computation of spheroidal wave functions," Journal of Physics A, Vol. 36, 5477-5495, 2003.
doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/20/309        Google Scholar

18. Yaghjian, A. D. and S. R. Best, "Impedance, bandwidth and Q of antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 53, No. 4, 1298-1324, Apr. 2005.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2005.844443        Google Scholar

19. Collin, R. E. and S. Rothschild, "Evaluation of antenna Q," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 17, No. 1, 23-27, Jan. 1964.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1964.1138151        Google Scholar

20. McLean, J. S., "A re-examination of the fundamental limits on the radiation Q of electrically small antennas ," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 44, No. 5, 672-676, May 1996.
doi:10.1109/8.496253        Google Scholar

21. Best, S. R., "A Comparison of the cylindrical folded helix Q to the Gustafsson limit," Antennas and Propagation, 2009. EuCAP 2009. 3rd European Conference in Berlin, 2554-2557, March 23-27, 2009.

22. Sten, J. C.-E., "Radiation Q of a small antenna enclosed in an oblate spheroidal volume: Transverse-to-axis polarisation," AEU. Int. Jl. Electron. Commun., Vol. 57, No. 3, 201-205, 2003.        Google Scholar

23. Best, S. R., "The radiation properties of electrically small folded spherical helix antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 52, 953-960, 2004.        Google Scholar

24. Best, S. R., "Low Q electrically small linear and elliptical polarized spherical dipole antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 53, 1047-1053, 2005.        Google Scholar

25. Hirvonen, M. and S. A. Tretyakov, "Near-zero permittivity substrates for horizontal antennas: performance enhancement and limitations," Microw. and Opt. Tech. Lett., Vol. 50, 2674-2677, Oct. 2008.        Google Scholar

26. Stuart, H. R., A. D. Yaghjian, and S. R. Best, "Limitations in relating quality factor to bandwidth in a double resonance small antenna ," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 4, 460-463, 2007.        Google Scholar

27. Wang, J., S. Qu, J. Zhang, H. Ma, Y. Yang, C. Gu, and X.Wu, "A tunable left-handed metamaterial based on modified broadside-coupled split-ring resonators ," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 6, 35-45, 2009.        Google Scholar

28. Hu, X., Q. Zhang, and S. Xe, "Compact dual-band rejection filter based on complementary meander line split ring resonator," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 8, 181-190, 2009.        Google Scholar