2022-12-11
Light Trapping for Absorption Control in Perovskite-Based Photovoltaic Solar Cells
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 108, 41-48, 2023
Abstract
Nanostructure based perovskite solar cell with high performance is the emphasis of study in current work keeping in view the improvement in cell efficiency. In the first part of the study, a plane-layered solar cell is studied by adding a 1D photonic crystal at the bottom of the cell in order to facilitate the photon rotation process. However, in the second part of the study, it is observed that addition of grating enhances the light absorption due to photons trapping. Following that, the light absorption of three different structures is compared. The observations reveal that short-circuit current density (Jsc) is found to be -39.93 mA/cm2, which is 87.29% higher than that for a planar structure exhibiting the Jsc value as -21.32 mA/cm2. Ultimately, the efficiencies of these perovskite solar cells based on nanostructures are observed to be significant as well. For the proposed solar cell structure, an 87.24% improvement in the power conversion efficiency (PCE) is observed i.e., from 14.03% for the planar structure to 26.27%.
Citation
Maroua Chahmi, Mounir Bouras, Moufdi Hadjab, and Mohammad Alam Saeed, "Light Trapping for Absorption Control in Perovskite-Based Photovoltaic Solar Cells," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 108, 41-48, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERL22110505
References

1. Service, R. F., "Perovskite solar cells keep on surging," Science, Vol. 344, 458-458, 2014.
doi:10.1126/science.344.6183.458        Google Scholar

2. McGehee, M. D., "Fast-track solar cells," Nature, Vol. 501, 323-325, 2013.
doi:10.1038/nature12557        Google Scholar

3. Kojima, A., K. Teshima, Y. Shirai, and T. O. Miyasaka, "Halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells," J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 131, 6050-6051, 2009.
doi:10.1021/ja809598r        Google Scholar

4. Nie, W., et al. "High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains," Science, Vol. 347, 522-525, 2015.
doi:10.1126/science.aaa0472        Google Scholar

5. Rühle, S., "Tabulated values of the Shockley-Queisser limit for single junction solar cells," Sol. Energy, 2016.        Google Scholar

6. Zhou, H., et al. "Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells," Science, Vol. 345, 542-546, 2014.
doi:10.1126/science.1254050        Google Scholar

7. Green, M. A., K. Emery, Y. Hishikawa, W. Warta, and E. D. Dunlop, "Solar cell efficiency tables (version 45)," Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., Vol. 23, 1-9, 2015.
doi:10.1002/pip.2573        Google Scholar

8. Malinkiewicz, O., et al. "Perovskite solar cells employing organic charge-transport layers," Nature Photon., Vol. 8, 128-132, 2014.
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.341        Google Scholar

9. Docampo, P., J. M. Ball, M. Darwich, G. E. Eperon, and H. J. Snaith, "Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates," Nature Commun., Vol. 4, 2761, 2013.
doi:10.1038/ncomms3761        Google Scholar

10. Shah, A. V., et al. "Thin-film solar cell technology," Progr. Photovolt. Res. Appl., Vol. 12, 113-142, 2004.
doi:10.1002/pip.533        Google Scholar

11. Yu, Z., A. Raman, and S. Fan, PNAS, Vol. 107, No. 41, 17491-17496, 2010, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1008296107.

12. Tang, Z., W. Tress, and O. Inganäs, Mater Today, Vol. 17, No. 8, 389-396, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.05.008.

13. Nelson, J., The Physics of Solar Cell, Imperial College Press, United Kingdom, London, 2008, DOI: 10.1142/p276.

14. Sathya, P. and R. Natarajan, Int. J. Energy Res., Vol. 41, 1211-1222, DOI: 10.1002/er.3708.

15. Shuba, M. V., et al. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 32, 1222-1230, 2015, DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.32.001222.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.32.001222        Google Scholar

16. Gabriel, C., Optics And Optoelectronics, Vol. 19, 2021, DOI:10.15598/aeee.v19i2.4140.

17. Bhatnagar, A. and V. Janyani, IEEE International Conference on Computer, Communications and Electronics, 516-520, Jaipur, 2017.

18. Scholtz, L., L. Ladanyi, and J. Mullerova, Applied Physics, Vol. 12, 2014, DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v12i6.1078.        Google Scholar

19. Abdelraouf, O. A. and N. K. Allam, Sol. Energy, Vol. 137, 364-370, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.039.
doi:10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.039        Google Scholar

20. Abdelraouf, O. A., A. Shaker, and N. K. Allam, Opt. Mater., Vol. 86, 311-317, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2018.10.028.
doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2018.10.028        Google Scholar

21. Bendib, T., H. Bencherif, and M. A. Abdi, "Combined optical-electrical modeling of perovskite solar cell with an optimized design," Optical Materials, Vol. 109, 110259, 2020, doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.110259.
doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2020.110259        Google Scholar

22. Hajjiah, A., H. Badran, and I. Kandas, Energies, Vol. 13, 3854, 2020, doi:10.3390/en13153854.
doi:10.3390/en13153854        Google Scholar

23. Bhatnagar, A. and V. Janyani, Advanced Materials Letters, Vol. 9, No. 10, 721-726, 2018, DOI: 10.5185/amlett.2018.2108.