Vol. 119
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2024-04-13
Application of Improved SROM Based on RBF Neural Network Model in EMC Worst Case Estimation
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 119, 51-57, 2024
Abstract
The Stochastic Reduced-Order Models (SROM) is a non-embedded uncertainty analysis method that has the advantages of high computational efficiency, easy implementation, and no dimensional disasters. Recently, it has been widely used in the field of EMC simulation. In the process of optimizing electromagnetic protection design, the worst-case estimation value is an extremely important uncertainty quantification simulation result. However, the SROM has a large error in providing this result, which limits its application in the field of EMC simulation prediction. An improved SROM based on the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network algorithm is proposed in this paper, which improves the fitness function in the genetic algorithm center clustering process and constructs an RBF neural network model to obtain accurate worst-case estimation results. The accuracy improvement effect of the algorithm proposed in this paper in worst-case estimation is quantitatively verified by using a parallel cable crosstalk prediction example from published literature.
Citation
Bing Hu, Yingxin Wang, Shenghang Huo, and Jinjun Bai, "Application of Improved SROM Based on RBF Neural Network Model in EMC Worst Case Estimation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 119, 51-57, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERL24012503
References

1. Manfredi, Paolo, Dries Vande Ginste, Igor S. Stievano, Daniël De Zutter, and Flavio G. Canavero, "Stochastic transmission line analysis via polynomial chaos methods: An overview," IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 3, 77-84, Nov. 2017.

2. Chen, Joe, Salvador Portillo, Grant Heileman, Ghadeh Hadi, Rusmir Bilalic, Manel Martínez-Ramón, Sameer Hemmady, and Edl Schamiloglu, "Time-varying radiation impedance of microcontroller GPIO ports and their dependence on software instructions," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 64, No. 4, 1147-1159, 2022.

3. Pignari, Sergio A., Giordano Spadacini, and Flavia Grassi, "Modeling field-to-wire coupling in random bundles of wires," IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 3, 85-90, Nov. 2017.

4. Wang, Tianhao, Yinhan Gao, Le Gao, Chang-Ying Liu, Juxian Wang, and Zhanyang An, "Statistical analysis of crosstalk for automotive wiring harness via polynomial chaos method.," Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1503-1517, 2016.

5. Ren, Ziyan, Jiangang Ma, Yanli Qi, Dianhai Zhang, and Chang-Seop Koh, "Managing uncertainties of permanent magnet synchronous machine by adaptive kriging assisted weight index monte carlo simulation method," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2162-2169, 2020.

6. Fei, Zhouxiang, Yi Huang, Jiafeng Zhou, and Qian Xu, "Uncertainty quantification of crosstalk using stochastic reduced order models," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 59, No. 1, 228-239, 2016.

7. Xie, Haiyan, John F. Dawson, Jiexiong Yan, Andy C. Marvin, and Martin P. Robinson, "Numerical and analytical analysis of stochastic electromagnetic fields coupling to a printed circuit board trace," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1128-1135, Aug. 2020.

8. Cui, Chunfeng and Zheng Zhang, "High-dimensional uncertainty quantification of electronic and photonic IC with non-Gaussian correlated process variations," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 39, No. 8, 1649-1661, 2019.

9. Fei, Zhouxiang, Yi Huang, Jiafeng Zhou, and Chaoyun Song, "Numerical analysis of a transmission line illuminated by a random plane-wave field using stochastic reduced order models," IEEE Access, Vol. 5, 8741-8751, 2017.

10. Larbi, Mourad, Philippe Besnier, and Bernard Pecqueux, "The adaptive controlled stratification method applied to the determination of extreme interference levels in EMC modeling with uncertain input variables," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 2, 543-552, 2016.

11. Houret, Thomas, Philippe Besnier, Stephane Vauchamp, and Philippe Pouliguen, "Controlled stratification based on Kriging surrogate model: An algorithm for determining extreme quantiles in electromagnetic compatibility risk analysis," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 3837-3847, 2019.

12. Bai, Jinjun, Xintao Geng, and Xiaobing Niu, "Application of non-embedded uncertainty analysis methods in worst case estimation of the EMC," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 135, 173-180, 2023.

13. Yu, Z., Z. Qing, and M. Yan, "Application of chaos immune optimization RBF network in dynamic deformation prediction," Geodesy and Geodynamics, Vol. 32, No. 5, 53-57, 2012.

14. Zhang, Min-Ling and Zhi-Hua Zhou, "Adapting RBF neural networks to multi-instance learning," Neural Processing Letters, Vol. 23, 1-26, 2006.

15. Xia, Liangqiong, Penghao Hu, Kunlong Ma, and Long Yang, "Research on measurement modeling of spherical joint rotation angle based on RBF–ELM network," IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 21, No. 20, 23118-23124, Oct. 2021.

16. Yang, Y., S. S. Gao, and G. G. Hu, "Optimal algorithm for RBF neural network structure based on variance significance in output sensitivity," Control and Decision, Vol. 30, No. 8, 1393-1398, 2015.

17. Ye, Guoqiang, Weiguang Li, and Hao Wan, "Study of RBF neural network based on PSO algorithm in nonlinear system identification," 2015 8th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), 852-855, 2015.

18. Zhu, Gengxian and Xiuli Wang, "Study on route travel time prediction based on RBF neural network," 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, Vol. 2, 1118-1122, 2009.

19. Bai, Jinjun, Jingchao Sun, and Ning Wang, "Convergence determination of EMC uncertainty simulation based on the improved mean equivalent area method," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, Vol. 36, No. 11, 1446-1452, Nov. 2021.

20. Bai, Jinjun, Gang Zhang, Di Wang, Alistair P. Duffy, and Lixin Wang, "Performance comparison of the SGM and the SCM in EMC simulation," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1739-1746, Dec. 2016.

21. "IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations," 1-41, IEEE STD 1597.1-2008, 2008.

22. "IEEE Recommended Practice for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations," 1-124, IEEE STD 1597.2-2010, 2010.