Vol. 23
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 117 [2026] PIERB 116 [2026] PIERB 115 [2025] PIERB 114 [2025] PIERB 113 [2025] PIERB 112 [2025] PIERB 111 [2025] PIERB 110 [2025] PIERB 109 [2024] PIERB 108 [2024] PIERB 107 [2024] PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2010-07-25
Comparison of Two Types of Dual Layer Generator in Field Assisted Mode Utilizing3D-FEM and Experimental Verification
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 23, 293-309, 2010
Abstract
This paper presents the comparison results between two new generator configurations. These generator units are namely a field assisted switched reluctance generator (SRG) and a brushless dc (BLDC) generator. No permanent magnets are used in either unit. The field assisted SR generator consists of two magnetically dependent stator and rotor sets (layers), where each stator set includes twelve salient poles with windings wrapped around them, while the rotor comprises of eight salient poles without any winding or permanent magnet. There is a stationary reel, which has the field coil wrapped around it and is placed between the two-stator sets. The BLDC generator is also made up of two magnetically dependent stator and rotor sets, but each stator set includes nine salient poles with windings wrapped around them while, the rotor comprises of six salient poles without any windings or permanent magnets. There is also a stationary reel between the two layers to produce the magnetic field through the motor assembly. This magnetic field travels through a guide to the rotor then the stator and finally completes its path via the generator housing. The generator phase windings for each layer are connect such that all the stator poles in that set can have either north or south pole configuration while the stator poles in the other layer have the opposite pole arrangement. This type of connection can be used in motoring mode as well. To evaluate the performance of the generators, two types of analysis, namely, numerical technique and experimental study have been utilized. In the numerical analysis, three dimensional finite element analysis is employed, whereas in the experimental study, proto-types have been built and tested.
Citation
Hossein Torkaman, and Seyed Ebrahim Afjei, "Comparison of Two Types of Dual Layer Generator in Field Assisted Mode Utilizing3D-FEM and Experimental Verification," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 23, 293-309, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERB10060808
References

1. Schofield, N. and S. Long, "Generator operation of a switched reluctance starter/generator at extended speeds," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, 48-56, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TVT.2008.924981        Google Scholar

2. Lee, H., et al. "Practical control for improving power density and efficiency of the BLDC generator," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 192-199, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2004.839805        Google Scholar

3. Lee, H. W., T. H. Kim, and M. Ehsani, "Maximum power throughput in the multiphase brushless DC generator," IEE Proceedings Electric Power Applications, Vol. 152, No. 3, 501-508, 2005.
doi:10.1049/ip-epa:20045051        Google Scholar

4. Kim, T., H. W. Lee, and M. Ehsani, "Position sensorless brushless DC motor/generator drives: Review and future trends," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 1, No. 4, 557-564, 2007.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20060358        Google Scholar

5. Chen, H. C., T. Y. Tsai, and C. K. Huang, "Low-speed performance comparisons of back-EMF detection circuits with position-dependent load torque," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 3, No. 2, 160-169, 2009.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20080017        Google Scholar

6. Zhang, Z., Y. Yan, S. Yang, et al. "Development of a new permanent-magnet BLDC generator using 12-phase half-wave rectifier," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 56, No. 6, 2023-2029, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2009.2016511        Google Scholar

7. Chen, H. and J. J. Gu, "Implementation of the three-phase switched reluctance machine system for motors and generators," IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 421-432, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TMECH.2009.2027901        Google Scholar

8. Torkaman, H. and E. Afjei, "FEM analysis of angular misalignment fault in SRM magnetostatic characteristics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 104, 31-48, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10041406        Google Scholar

9. Afjei, E., A. Seyadatan, and H. Torkaman, "A new two phase bidirectional hybrid switched reluctance motor/field-assisted generator," Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, 765-770, 2009.
doi:10.3923/jas.2009.765.770        Google Scholar

10. Ding, W. and D. Liang, "Dynamic modeling and control for a switched reluctance starter/generator system," International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, 3315-3320, 2008.        Google Scholar

11. Ferreira, C. A., S. R. Jones, W. S. Heglund, et al. "Detailed design of a 30-kW switched reluctance starter/generator system for a gas turbine engine application," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 31, No. 3, 553-561, 1995.
doi:10.1109/28.382116        Google Scholar

12. Echenique, E., J. Dixon, R. Cardenas, et al. "Sensorless control for a switched reluctance wind generator, based on current slopes and neural networks," IEEE Transaction on Industrial slopes and neural networks, Vol. 56, No. 3, 817-825, 2009.        Google Scholar

13. Cardenas, R., R. Pena, M. Perez, et al. "Control of a switched reluctance generator for variable-speed wind energy applications," IEEE Transaction on Energy Conversion, Vol. 20, No. 4, 781-791, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2005.853733        Google Scholar

14. Fahimi, B., A. Emadi, R. B. Sepe, and Jr., "A switched reluctance machine-based starter/alternator for more electric cars," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 19, No. 1, 116-124, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2003.822322        Google Scholar

15. Afjei, E. and H. Torkaman, "The novel two phase field-assisted hybrid SRG: Magnetio static field analysis, simulation, and experimental confirmation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 18, 25-42, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERB09082404        Google Scholar

16. Hanselman, D. C., Brushless Permanent Magnet Motor Design, McGraw-Hill, 1994.

17. Afjei, E. and H. Toliyat, "A novel hybrid brushless dc motor/generator for hybrid vehicles applications," International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems, 1-6, 2006.
doi:10.1109/PEDES.2006.344366        Google Scholar

18. Ravaud, R., G. Lemarquand, V. Lemarquand, and C. Depollier, "The three exact components of the magnetic field created by a radially magnetized tile permanent magnet," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 88, 307-319, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08112708        Google Scholar

19. Ravaud, R., G. Lemarquand, V. Lemarquand, S. I. Babic, and C. Akyel, "Mutual inductance and force exerted between thick coils," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 102, 367-380, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10012806        Google Scholar

20. Ravaud, R., G. Lemarquand, V. Lemarquand, S. Babic, and C. Akyel, "Mutual inductance and force exerted between thick coils," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 102, 367-380, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10012806        Google Scholar

21. Torkaman, H. and E. Afjei, "Magnetio static field analysis regarding the effects of dynamic eccentricity in switched reluctance motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 8, 163-180, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERM09060205        Google Scholar

22. Torkaman, H. and E. Afjei, "Hybrid method of obtaining degrees of freedom for radial airgap length in SRM under normal and faulty conditions based on magnetiostatic model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 100, 37-54, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER09111108        Google Scholar

23. Magnet CAD package, , User Manual, Infolytica Corporation Ltd., 2007.