2012-07-24
Experimental Performance Comparison of Six-Port and Conventional Zero-IF/Low-IF Receivers for Software Defined Radio
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 42, 311-333, 2012
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental performance comparison among three RF architectures that are very suitable for Software Defined Radio (SDR) implementation: zero-IF, low-IF, and six-port network. A six-port receiver and a dual zero-IF/low-IF receiver have been developed for this purpose. Six-port receiver is a very promising and flexible RF architecture for the low-cost implementation of integrated microwave and millimeter-wave systems. Competitive advantages such as ultra-broadband behavior, low-cost, reconfigurability, and low power consumption, point to the six-port architecture as a good candidate to implement a SDR. However, two issues on broadband six-port receivers require intensive research: dynamic range extension, and miniaturization. In this paper, two solutions are proposed to solve these problems: the use of biased detector diodes for dynamic range extension, and the use of low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technology for six-port reduction. The measurement results indicate that the six-port receiver shows high potential benefits and advantages compared to conventional zero-IF and low-IF receivers. In addition, the capability of the six-port architecture to operate as both zero-IF and low-IF receivers has been experimentally demonstrated for the first time.
Citation
Cristina de la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, and Mateo Burgos-Garcia, "Experimental Performance Comparison of Six-Port and Conventional Zero-IF/Low-IF Receivers for Software Defined Radio," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 42, 311-333, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12061210
References

1. Bagheri, R., A. Mirzaei, M. E. Heidari, S. Chehrazi, M. Lee, M. Mikhemar, W. K. Tang, and A. A. Abidi, "Software-defined radio receiver: Dream to reality," IEEE Communications Mag., Vol. 44, No. 8, 111-118, Aug. 2006.
doi:10.1109/MCOM.2006.1678118        Google Scholar

2. Abidi, A. A., "The path to the software-defined radio receiver," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 42, No. 5, 954-966, May 2007.
doi:10.1109/JSSC.2007.894307        Google Scholar

3. Luy, J.-F., "Software configurable receivers," European Microwave Conf., 1-8, Sep. 2002.        Google Scholar

4. Wu, K., "Multiport interferometer techniques for innovative transceiver applications," IEEE Radio and Wireless Symp., 531-534, New Orleans, LA, Jan. 2010.        Google Scholar

5. Puvaneswari, O. S., "Wideband analog front-end for multistandard software defined radio receiver," IEEE Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Vol. 3, 1937-1941, Sep. 2004.        Google Scholar

6. Khaddaj Mallat, N., E. Moldovan, and S. O. Tatu, "Comparative demodulation results for six-port and conventional 60 GHz direct conversion receivers ," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 84, 437-449, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08081003        Google Scholar

7. Razavi, B., "Design considerations for direct-conversion receivers," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., Vol. 44, No. 6, 428-435, Jun. 1997.
doi:10.1109/82.592569        Google Scholar

8. Crols, J. and M. S. J. Steyaert, "Low-IF topologies for high-performance analog front ends of fully integrated receivers," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Analog. Digit. Signal Process., Vol. 45, No. 3, 269-282, Mar. 1998.
doi:10.1109/82.664233        Google Scholar

9. Hartley, R., "Single-sideband modulator,", U.S. Patent 1 666 206, Apr. 1928.        Google Scholar

10. Weaver, D. K., "A third method of generation and detection of singlesideband signals," Proc. IRE, Vol. 44, 1703-1705, 1956.
doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1956.275061        Google Scholar

11. Hentschel, T., "The six-port as a communications receiver," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 53, No. 3, 1039-1047, Mar. 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2005.843507        Google Scholar

12. Neveux, G., B. Huyart, and G. J. Rodriguez-Guisantes, "Wide-band RF receiver using the `five-port' technology," IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1441-1451, Sep. 2004.
doi:10.1109/TVT.2004.832392        Google Scholar

13. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., K. Mabrouk, B. Huyart, A. Mbaye, and M. Burgos-García, "Direct baseband I-Q regeneration method for five-port receivers improving DC-offset and second-order intermodulation distortion rejection," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 60, No. 8, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2012.2199512        Google Scholar

14. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C. and M. Burgos-García, "Four-octave six-port receiver and its calibration for broadband communications and software defined radios," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 116, 1-21, 2011.        Google Scholar

15. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., M. Burgos-García, and D. Rodríguez-Aparicio, "Three octave six-port network for a broadband software radio receiver," European Microwave Conf., Vol. 1110, No. 1113, Paris, France, 2010.        Google Scholar

16. Bahl, I. and P. Bhartia, Microwave Solid State Circuit Design, Chapter 11.2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988.

17. Hewlett-Packard Application Note 956-5, , "Dynamic range extension of schottky detectors,", 1975.        Google Scholar

18. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., M. Burgos-García, and . Rodríguez-Aparicio, "Software defined radio technologies for emergency and professional wide band communications," IEEE Int. Carnahan Conf. Security Tech., 357-363, San Jose, CA, Oct. 5-8, 2010.        Google Scholar

19. Xu, Y. and R. G. Bosisio, "On the real time calibration of six-port receivers," Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 20, No. 5, 318-322, 1999.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(19990305)20:5<318::AID-MOP11>3.0.CO;2-1        Google Scholar

20. Perez-Lara, P., J. A. Medina-Rodriguez, I. Molina-Fernandez, J. G. Wanguemert-Perez, and A. Gonzalez-Salguero, "Wideband homodyne six-port receiver with high LO-RF isolation," IET Microw. Antennas Propag., Vol. 3, No. 5, 882-888, 2009.
doi:10.1049/iet-map.2008.0288        Google Scholar

21. Tatu, S. O. and T. A. Denidni, "New millimeter-wave six-port heterodyne receiver architecture," IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., 1999-2002, Jun. 2006.
doi:10.1109/MWSYM.2006.249845        Google Scholar

22. Boukari, B., E. Moldovan, S. Affes, K. Wu, R. G. Bosisio, and S. O. Tatu, "A heterodyne six-port FMCW radar sensor architecture based on beat signal phase slope techniques," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 93, 307-322, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09052610        Google Scholar

23. Fusco, V. and C. Wang, "V-band 57-65 GHz receiver," IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-7, Jan. 2010.
doi:10.1049/iet-map.2008.0424        Google Scholar

24. Hammou, D., E. Modovan, and S. O. Tatu, "Modelling and analysis of a modified V-band MHMIC six-port circuits," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1419-1427, 2010.
doi:10.1163/156939310791958644        Google Scholar

25. Abielmona, S., H. V. Nguyen, C. Caloz, K. Wu, and R. G. Bosisio, "Compact multilayer ultra-wideband six-port device for modulation/demodulation," Electronics Lett., Vol. 43, No. 15, 813-814, Jul. 2007.
doi:10.1049/el:20070678        Google Scholar

26. Winter, S. M., A. Koelpin, and R. Weigel, "Six-port receiver analog front-end: Multilayer design and system simulation," IEEE Trans. Circuits Sist. II, Vol. 55, No. 3, 254-258, Mar. 2008.
doi:10.1109/TCSII.2008.918999        Google Scholar

27. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., M. Burgos, and J. Gismero-Menoyo, "Contribution of LTCC technology to the miniaturization of six-port networks," European Microw. Conf., 659-662, Manchester, UK, Oct. 2011.        Google Scholar