2012-09-20
A Novel Nonuniform Subgridding Scheme for FDTD Using an Optimal Interpolation Technique
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 44, 137-161, 2012
Abstract
Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) subgridding schemes can significantly improve efficiency of various electromagnetic circuit simulations. However, numerous subgridding schemes suffer from issues associated with stability, efficiency, and material traverse capability. These issues limit general applicability of FDTD subgridding schemes to realistic problems. Herein, a robust nonuniform subgridding scheme is presented that overcomes those weaknesses. The scheme improves simulation accuracy with the aid of greatly increased stability margin and an optimal interpolation technique. It also improves simulation efficiency by allowing the use of time step factors as close as the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) limit. In addition, latetime stability and general applicability are verified through practical microstrip circuit simulation examples.
Citation
Gyusub Kim, Ercument Arvas, Veysel Demir, and Atef Elsherbeni, "A Novel Nonuniform Subgridding Scheme for FDTD Using an Optimal Interpolation Technique," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 44, 137-161, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12071013
References

1. Elsherbeni, A. and V. Demir, The Finite-difference Time-domain Method for Electromagnetics with MATLAB Simulations, SciTech Publishing, Inc., Raleigh, NC, 2009.

2. Courant, R., K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy, "On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics," IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 11, No. 2, 215-234, 1967.
doi:10.1147/rd.112.0215        Google Scholar

3. Thoma, P. and T. Weiland, "A consistent subgridding scheme for the finite difference time domain method," Int. J. Numer. Modeling: Electron. Networks, Devices Fields, Vol. 9, 359-374, 1996.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1204(199609)9:5<359::AID-JNM245>3.0.CO;2-A        Google Scholar

4. Krishnaiah, K. and C. Railton, "A stable subgridding algorithm and its application to eigenvalue problems," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 47, No. 5, 620-628, May 1999.
doi:10.1109/22.763164        Google Scholar

5. Xiao, K., D. Pommerenke, and J. Drewniak, "A three dimensional FDTD subgridding algorithm based on interpolation of current density," Proc. IEEE EMC Symp., Vol. 1, 118-123, Santa Clara,CA, 2004.        Google Scholar

6. Xiao, K., D. Pommerenke, and J. Drewniak, "A three-dimensional FDTD subgridding algorithm with separated temporal and spatial interfaces and related stability analysis," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 55, No. 7, 1981-1990, Jul. 2007.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2007.900180        Google Scholar

7. Monk, P., "Subgridding FDTD schemes," Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Society J., Vol. 11, No. 1, 37-46, 1996.        Google Scholar

8. Chilton, R. A. and R. Lee, "Conservative and provably stable FDTD subgridding," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 55, No. 9, 2537-254, Sep. 2007.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2007.904092        Google Scholar

9. Chevalier, M. W., R. J. Luebbers, and V. P. Cable, "FDTD local grid with material traverse," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 45, 411-421, Mar. 1997.
doi:10.1109/8.558656        Google Scholar

10. White, M. J., Z. Yun, and M. F. Iskander, "A new 3-D FDTD multigrid technique with dielectric traverse capabilities," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 49, 422-430, 2001.
doi:10.1109/22.910545        Google Scholar

11. Vaccari, A., R. Pontalti, C. Malacarne, and L. Cristoforetti, "A robust and efficient subgridding algorithm for finite-difference time-domain simulations of Maxwell's equations," J. Comp. Phys., Vol. 194, 117-139, 2004.
doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.002        Google Scholar

12. Donderici, B. and F. L. Teixeira, "Improved FDTD subgridding algorithms via digital filtering and domain overriding," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 53, No. 9, 2938-2951, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2005.854558        Google Scholar

13. Kulas, L. and M. Mrozowski, "Low reflection subgridding," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 53, No. 5, 1587-1592, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2005.847048        Google Scholar

14. Berenger, J.-P., "A Huygens subgridding for the FDTD method," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 54, 3797-3804, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2006.886519        Google Scholar

15. Moler, C., Numerical Computing with MATLAB, 2004, Available: http://www.mathworks.com/moler/index ncm.html.

16. Okoniewski, M., E. Okoniewska, and M. A. Stuchly, "Three-dimensional subgridding algorithm for FDTD," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 45, No. 3, 422-429, 1997.
doi:10.1109/8.558657        Google Scholar

17. Kermani, M. H. and O. M. Ramahi, "The complementary derivatives method: A second-order accurate interpolation scheme for nonuniform grid in FDTD simulation," IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 16, 60-62, Feb. 2006.
doi:10.1109/LMWC.2005.863253        Google Scholar

18. "Sonnet User's Guide --- Release 12," Sonnet Software Inc., North Syracuse, NY, Apr. 2009.        Google Scholar

19. Liu, Y. and C. D. Sarris, "Efficient modeling of microwave integrated circuit geometries via a dynamically adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) --- FDTD technique," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 54, No. 2, 689-703, Feb. 2006.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2005.862660        Google Scholar

20. Sheen, D. M., S. M. Ali, M. D. Abouzahra, and J. A. Kong, "Application of the three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain method to the analysis of planar microstrip circuits," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 38, 849-857, Jul. 1990.        Google Scholar