volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

The multifractal characteristics of return signals from aircraft targets in conventional radars offer a fine description of dynamic characteristics which induce the targets' echo structure; therefore they can provide a new way for aircraft target classification and recognition with low-resolution surveillance radars. On basis of introducing the mathematical model of return signals from aircraft targets in conventional radars, the paper analyzes the multifractal characteristics of the return signals as well as the extraction method of their multifractal features by means of the multifractal analysis of measures, and puts forward a multifractal-feature-based classification method for three types of aircraft targets (including jet aircrafts, propeller aircrafts and helicopters) from the viewpoint of pattern classification. The analysis shows that the conventional radar return signals from the three types of aircraft targets have significantly different multifractal characteristics, and the defined characteristic parameters can be used as effective features for aircraft target classification and recognition. The results of classification experiments validate the proposed method.

1. Shirman, Y. D., Computer Simulation of Aerial Target Radar Scattering, Recognition, Detection, and Tracking, 111-124, Artech House, Boston, 2002.

2. Ding, J. J., Target Recognition Techniques of Surveillance Radar, 40-41, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2008.

3. Chen, F., H. W. Liu, L. Du, et al. "Target classification with low-resolution radar based on dispersion situations of eigenvalue spectra," Science China: Information Sciences, Vol. 53, 1446-1460, 2010. Google Scholar

4. Ghadaki, H. and R. Dizaji, "Target track classification for airport surveillance radar (ASR)," Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Radar, 24-27, 2006. Google Scholar

5. Leung, H., "Intelligent radar recognition system for surveillance," Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2280-2285, 1995. Google Scholar

6. Leung, H. and J. Wu, "Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer target identification for radar surveillance," IEEE Transactions on erospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 36, 432-447, 2000. Google Scholar

7. Chan, S. C., K. C. Lee, and , "Radar target identification by kernel principal component analysis on RCS," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 26, No. 1, 64-74, 2012. Google Scholar

8. Pouliguen, P., L. Lucas, F. Muller, et al. "Calculation and analysis of electromagnetic scattering by helicopter rotating blades," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 50, 1193-1408, 2002. Google Scholar

9. Bell, M. R. and R. A. Grubbs, "JEM modeling and measurement for radar target identification," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 29, 73-87, 1993. Google Scholar

10. Piazza, E., "Radar signals analysis and modellization presence of JEM application in the civilian ATC radars," IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Vol. 14, 35-40, 1999. Google Scholar

11. Martin, J., B. Mulgrew, "Analysis of the theoretical return signal from aircraft blades," Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Radar, 569-572, 1990. Google Scholar

12. Yang, S. Y. and S. M. Yeh, "Electromagnetic backscattering from aircraft propeller blades," EEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 33, 1432-1435, 1997. Google Scholar

13. Martin, J. and B. Mulgrew, "Analysis of the effects of blade pitch on the radar return signal from rotating aircraft blades," Proceedings of IET International Conference on Radar, 446-449, 1992. Google Scholar

14. Yoon, S., B. Kim, and Y. Kim, "Helicopter classification using time-frequency analysis," Electronics Letters, Vol. 36, 1871-1872, 2000. Google Scholar

15. Xian, M., Z. W. Zhuang, Z. P. Chen, et al. "The fractal characteristic of radar target based on polarimetry," Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Vol. 1, 339-344, 1996. Google Scholar

16. Mishra, A. K., H. Feng, and B. Mulgrew, "Fractal feature based radar signal classification," Proceedings of IET International Conference on Radar Systems, 1-4, 2007. Google Scholar

17. Ding, J. J., X. D. Zhang, and , "Studies of analysis of JEM signatures and classification of targets in the conventional radar," Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, Vol. 25 , 956-962, 2003. Google Scholar

18. Elshafei, M., S. Akhtar, and M. S. Ahmed, "Parametric models for helicopter identification using ANN," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 36, 1242-1252, 2000. Google Scholar

19. Melendez, G. J. and S. B. Kesler, "Spectrum estimation by neural networks and their use for target classification by radar," Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3615-361, 1995. Google Scholar

20. Moses, R. L. and J. W. Carl, "Autoregressive modeling of radar data with application to target identification," Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE National Radar Conference, 220-224, 1988. Google Scholar

21. Pellegrini, S. P. F. and C. S. Pardini, "Radar signals analysis oriented to target characterization applied to civilian ATC radar," Proceedings of IET International Conference Radar, 438-445, 1992. Google Scholar

22. Stove, A., "A Doppler-based target classifier using linear discriminants and principal components," Proceedings of IET Seminar on High Resolution Imaging and Target Classification, 171-176, 2006. Google Scholar

23. Jahangir, M., K. M. Ponting, and J. W. O'Loghlen, "Robust Doppler classi¯cation technique based on hidden Markov models," Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Radar, 162-166, 2002. Google Scholar

24. Jahangir, M., K. M. Ponting, and J. W. O'Loghlen, "Correction to robust Doppler classification technique based on hidden Markov models," Proceedings of IEE International Conference on Radar, Sonar and Navigation, Vol. 150, 387, 2003. Google Scholar

25. Ji, H. B., J. Li, and W. X. Xie, "Bispectrum based radar target classification," Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, 419-422, 1998. Google Scholar

26. Grassberger, P., "Generalized dimensions of strange attractors," Physics Letters A, Vol. 97, 227-230, 1983. Google Scholar

27. Hentschel, H. G. E. and I. Procaccia, "The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors," Physica D, Vol. 8, 435-444, 1983. Google Scholar

28. Halsey, T. C., M. H. Jensen, et al. "Fractal measures and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets," Physical Review A, Vol. 33, 1141-1151, 1986. Google Scholar

29. Telesca, L., V. Lapenna, and M. Macchiato, "Mono- and multi-fractal investigation of scaling properties in temporal patterns of seismic sequences," Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 19, 1-15, 2004. Google Scholar

30. Andric, M., Z. Durovic, and B. Zrnic, "Ground surveillance radar target classification based on fuzzy logic approach," Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer as a Tool, Vol. 2, 1390-1392, 2005. Google Scholar

31. ullard, B. D. and P. C. Dowdy, "Pulse Doppler signature of a rotary wing aircraft," IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Vol. 36, 28-30, 1991. Google Scholar

32. Yoon, S., B. Kim, and Y. Kim, "Helicopter classification using time-frequency analysis," Electronics Letters, Vol. 36, 1871-1872, 2000. Google Scholar

33. Duda, R. O., P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Classi¯cation,, 2nd Ed., 259-264, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2001.

Professor Qiusheng Li

Dr. Weixin Xie