volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Novel eagle shape microstrip wearable antennas (element and array) are presented. The single- and two-element antenna arrays are designed and fabricated on a Roger RT/Duroid 5880 substrate with dielectric constant of 2.2, thickness of 1.5748 mm, and tan δ = 0.001. The measured results show that a reduction in mutual coupling of 36 dB is achieved at the first band (1.68-2.65) GHz and 22.1 dB over the second band (6.5-8.86) GHz due to introducing electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures. EBG structure has an eagle-like shape with more gaps. By increasing the number of EBG cells and varying the gap distance between cells to certain limit, the mutual coupling reduction is improved. Also, a size reduction of 80% is achieved. The microstrip array was simulated by CST simulator version 2014 and fabricated by proto laser machine with precision 25 μm. The specific absorption rate (SAR) investigation is carried out on CST2014 Simulator. Maximum SAR value is 1.953 W/Kg which indicates that the eagle-shaped microstrip wearable antennas are safe for human. The antennas can be used in the official or RFID applications.

1. Hall, P. S. and Y. Hao, "Antennas and propagation for body centric communications," 1st European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Nice, Nov. 2006. Google Scholar

2. Hadjem, A., E. Conil, A. Gati, M. F. Wong, and J. Wiart, "Analysis of power absorbed by children’s head as a result of new usages of mobile phone," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 52, No. 4, 812-819, Nov. 2011.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2010.2052810 Google Scholar

3. Zhao, K., S. Zhang, Z. Ying, T. Bolin, and S. He, "SAR study of different MIMO antenna designs for LTE application in smart mobile handsets," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 61, No. 6, 3270-3279, Jun. 2013.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2013.2250239 Google Scholar

4. Parthasarathy, K. V., Mutual Coupling in Patch Antennas, Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, 2011.

5. Assimonis, S. D., T. V. Yioultsis, and C. S. Antonopoulos, "Design and optimization of uniplanar EBG structures for low profile antenna applications and mutual coupling reduction," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 60, No. 10, 4944-4949, Oct. 2012.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2012.2210178 Google Scholar

6. Exposito-Dominguez, G., J. M. Fernandez-Gonzalez, P. Padilla, and M. Sierra-Castaner, "Mutual coupling reduction using EBG in steering antennas," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 11, 1265-1268, 2012.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2012.2226013 Google Scholar

7. Hajilou, Y., H. R. Hassani, and B. Rahmati, "Mutual coupling reduction between microstrip patch antennas," Proceedings of 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), 1064-1067, Prague, Czech Republic, Mar. 2012. Google Scholar

8. Ahmed, M. I., E. A. Abdallah, A. A. Sebak, and H. M. ELhennawy, "Novel flagshape microstrip antenna array mutual coupling reduction," Proceedings of 2nd Advanced Electromagnetics Symposium (AES), 292-298, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, Mar. 2013. Google Scholar

9. Constantine, A. B., Antenna Theory, Analysis and Design, Chapter. 14, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005.

10. IEEE C95.1-2005 "IEEE standards for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz,", Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, 2005. Google Scholar

11. International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association "Guidelines on limits on exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz," Health Physics, Vol. 54, No. 1, 115-123, 1988. Google Scholar

12. Hall, P. S. and Y. Hao, Antennas and Propagation for Body-centric Wireless Communications, Artech House, Boston, 2012.

13. CST Microwave Studio Suite 2014 User’s Manual Computer Simulation Technology, Framingham, MA, USA, 2014, [Online], available:http://www.cst.com. Google Scholar

14. Gabriel, S., R. W. Lau, and C. Gabriel, "The dielectric properties of biological tissues. II. Measurements in the frequency range 10Hz to 20GHz," Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 41, 2251-2269, 2007. Google Scholar

16. Ilvonen, J., O. Kivekas, J. Holopainen, R. Valkonen, K. Rasilainen, and P. Vainikainen, "Mobile terminal antenna performance with the user’s hand: Effect of antenna dimensioning and location," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 10, 772-775, 2011.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2011.2163290 Google Scholar

17. Kwak, S. I., D. Sim, and J. H. Kwon, "Design of optimized multilayer PIFA with the EBG structure for SAR reduction in mobile applications," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 53, No. 2, 325-333, May 2011.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2011.2134101 Google Scholar

18. Kwak, S. I., D. Sim, and J. H. Kwon, "SAR reduction on a mobile phone antenna using the EBG structures," The 38th European Microwave Conference, 1308-1311, Oct. 2008. Google Scholar

19. Villanueva, R. G., H. J. Aguilar, and R. L. Miranda, "State of the art methods for low SAR antenna implementation," 2010 Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 1-4, 2010. Google Scholar

20. Jung, M. and B. Lee, "SAR reduction for mobile phones based on analysis of EM absorbing material characteristics," Proc. Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 2, 1017-1020, Jun. 2003. Google Scholar

21. Tang, C. L., J. Y. Sze, and Y. F. Wu, "A compact coupled-fed penta-band antenna for mobile phone application," APMC, 2260-2263, 2010. Google Scholar

22. Young, C. W., Y. B. Jung, and C. W. Jung, "Octaband internal antenna for 4G mobile handset," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 10, 817-819, 2011. Google Scholar

Dr. Mohamed Ismail Ahmed

Dr. Esmat A. F. Abdallah

Professor Hadia El-Hennawy