volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Filtered backpropagation (FBPP) is a well-known technique used in Diffraction Tomography (DT). For accurate reconstruction of a complex-valued image using FBPP, full 360˚ angular coverage is necessary. However, it has been shown that by exploiting inherent redundancies in the projection data, accurate reconstruction is possible with 270˚ coverage. This is called the minimal-scan angle range. This is done by applying weighting functions (or filters) on projection data of the object to eliminate the redundancies. There could be many general weight functions. These are all equivalent at 270˚ coverage but would perform differently at lower angular coverages and in presence of noise. This paper presents a generalized mathematical framework to generate weight functions for exploiting data redundancy. Further, a comparative analysis of different filters when angular coverage is lower than minimal-scan angle of 270˚ is presented. Simulation studies have been done to find optimum weight filters for sub-minimal angular coverage. The optimum weights generate images comparable to a full 360˚ coverage FBPP reconstruction. Performance of the filters in the presence of noise is also analyzed. These fast and deterministic algorithms are capable of correctly reconstructing complex valued images even at angular coverage of 200˚ while still under the FBPP regime.

1. Devaney, A., "A filtered backpropagation algorithm for diffraction tomography," Ultrasonic Imaging, Vol. 4, No. 4, 336-350, 1982.
doi:10.1177/016173468200400404 Google Scholar

2. Kak, A. C. and M. Slaney, "Tomographic imaging with diffracting sources," Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, New York, 1988. Google Scholar

3. Semenov, S., "Microwave tomography: Review of the progress towards clinical applications," Phil. Trans. of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 367, No. 1900, 3021-3042, 2009.
doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0092 Google Scholar

4. Ritzwoller, M. H., et al., "Global surface wave diffraction tomography," Jour. of Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, Vol. 107, No. B12, ESE 4-1-ESE 4-13, 2002.
doi:10.1029/2002JB001777 Google Scholar

5. Gorski, W. and W. Osten, "Tomographic imaging of photonic crystal fibers," Optics Letters, Vol. 32, No. 14, 1977-1979, 2006.
doi:10.1364/OL.32.001977 Google Scholar

6. Sung, Y., et al., "Optical diffraction tomography for high resolution live cell imaging," Opt. Express, Vol. 17, No. 1, 266-277, 2009.
doi:10.1364/OE.17.000266 Google Scholar

7. Kostencka, J., et al., "Accurate approach to capillary-supported optical diffraction tomography," Opt. Express, Vol. 23, No. 6, 7908-7923, 2015.
doi:10.1364/OE.23.007908 Google Scholar

8. Catapano, I., L. Di Donato, L. Crocco, O. M. Bucci, A. F. Morabito, T. Isernia, and R. Massa, "On quantitative microwave tomography of female breast," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 97, 75-93, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09080604 Google Scholar

9. Drogoudis, D. G., G. A. Kyriacou, and J. N. Sahalos, "Microwave tomography employing an adjoint network based sensitivity matrix," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 94, 213-242, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIER09060808 Google Scholar

10. Baran, A., D. J. Kurrant, A. Zakaria, E. C. Fear, and J. LoVetri, "Breast imaging using microwave tomography with radar-based tissue-regions estimation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 149, 161-171, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIER14080606 Google Scholar

11. Bayat, N. and P. Mojabi, "The effect of antenna incident field distribution on microwave tomography reconstruction," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 145, 153-161, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIER14021905 Google Scholar

12. Tayebi, A., et al., "Design and development of an electrically-controlled beam steering mirror for microwave tomography," AIP Conf. Proc. QNDE, Vol. 1650, No. 1, 501-508, 2015.
doi:10.1063/1.4914647 Google Scholar

13. Tayebi, A., et al., "Dynamic beam shaping using a dual-band electronically tunable reflectarray antenna," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 63, No. 10, 4534-4539, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2015.2456939 Google Scholar

14. Paladhi, P. R., et al., "Reconstruction algorithm for limited-angle diffraction tomography for microwave NDE," AIP Conf. Proc. QNDE, Vol. 1581, No. 1, 1544-1551, 2014.
doi:10.1063/1.4865007 Google Scholar

15. Ren, X. Z., et al., "A three-dimensional imaging algorithm for tomography SAR," IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2009, 184-187, Cape Town, South Africa, 2009. Google Scholar

16. Ren, X.-Z., L. H. Qiao, and Y. Qin, "A three-dimensional imaging algorithm for tomography SAR based on improved interpolated array transform," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 120, 181-193, 2011. Google Scholar

17. Capozzoli, A., C. Curcio, and A. Liseno, "Fast GPU-based interpolation for SAR backprojection," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 133, 259-283, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIER12071909 Google Scholar

18. Tsihrintzis, G. A. and A. J. Devaney, "Higher-order (nonlinear) diffraction tomography: Reconstruction algorithms and computer simulation," IEEE Trans. Image Proc., Vol. 9, No. 9, 1560-1572, 2000.
doi:10.1109/83.862637 Google Scholar

19. Vouldis, A. T., et al., "Three-dimensional diffraction tomography using ¯ltered backpropagation and multiple illumination planes," IEEE Trans. Instr. and Meas., Vol. 55, No. 6, 1975-1984, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2006.884276 Google Scholar

20. Ayasso, H., et al., "Bayesian inversion for optical diffraction tomography," Jour. Modern. Optics, Vol. 57, No. 9, 765-776, 2010.
doi:10.1080/09500340903564702 Google Scholar

21. Sung, Y. and R. R. Dasari, "Deterministic regularization of three-dimensional optical diffraction tomography," JOSA A, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1554-1561, 2011.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.28.001554 Google Scholar

22. Devaney, A., "The limited-view problem in diffraction tomography," Inverse Problems, Vol. 5, No. 4, 501-521, 1989.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/5/4/006 Google Scholar

23. Pan, A. and M. A. Anastasio, "Minimal-scan filtered backpropagation algorithms for diffraction tomography," JOSA A, Vol. 16, No. 12, 2896-2903, 1999.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.16.002896 Google Scholar

24. Pan, X., "Unified reconstruction theory for diffraction tomography, with consideration of noise control," JOSA A, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2312-2326, 1998.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.15.002312 Google Scholar

25. Anastasio, M. A. and X. Pan, "Full-and minimal-scan reconstruction algorithms for fan-beam diffraction tomography," Applied Optics, Vol. 40, No. 20, 3334-3345, 2001.
doi:10.1364/AO.40.003334 Google Scholar

26. Pan, X. and M. A. Anastasio, "On a limited-view reconstruction problem in diffraction tomography," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 21, No. 4, 413-416, 2002.
doi:10.1109/TMI.2002.1000265 Google Scholar

27. Paladhi, P. R., et al., "Data redundancy in diffraction tomography," 31st International Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics (ACES), Vol. 31, No. 4, 1-2, 2015. Google Scholar

28. Tsihrintzis, G. A. and A. J. Devaney, "Stochastic diffraction tomography: Theory and computer simulation," Signal Processing, Vol. 30, No. 1, 49-64, 1993.
doi:10.1016/0165-1684(93)90050-K Google Scholar

29. Anastasio, M. A. and X. Pan, "Investigation of the noise properties of a new class of reconstruction methods in diffraction tomography," International Jour. of Imaging Sys. and Tech., Vol. 10, No. 6, 437-446, 1999.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(1999)10:6<437::AID-IMA5>3.0.CO;2-0 Google Scholar

Dr. Pavel Roy Paladhi

Dr. Ashoke Sinha

Dr. Amin Tayebi

Dr. Lalita Udpa

Dr. Satish S. Udpa