Vol. 105
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2020-09-08
Performance Evaluation of a Neural Network Model and Two Empirical Models for Estimating Soil Moisture Based on Sentinel-1 SAR Data
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 105, 85-99, 2020
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to propose an inversion model of soil moisture using a neural network, and compare the performance of this method with two empirical models in soil moisture inversion. A wide dataset of backscattering coefficients extracted from Sentinel-1 images and in situ soil surface parameter measurements (moisture content and roughness) are used. Since the available backscattering models have limited performances of describing the nonlinear relationship between soil parameters and backscatter coefficient, the retrieval of soil parameters from radar backscattering coefficient remains challenging. The proposed inversion method of a neural network is used for establishing this relationship. At the same time, two empirical models are employed to estimate the soil moisture for comparison. The results show that for most of the six measuring stations the inverted soil moisture with the neural network model has higher correlation coefficient with the in-situ soil moisture than those by the empirical models. Moreover, the neural network model inversion results under multi-polarization input conditions are discussed in this paper. The results of stations 2, 4, and 5 show that R2 of multi-polarization inputs are increased by 0.1928, 0.4821, and 0.2758 respectively, compared with those of single-polarization inputs.
Citation
Yan Li, Songhua Yan, Nengcheng Chen, and Jianya Gong, "Performance Evaluation of a Neural Network Model and Two Empirical Models for Estimating Soil Moisture Based on Sentinel-1 SAR Data," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 105, 85-99, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERC20071601
References

1. Pacheco, A., et al., "The impact of national land cover and soils data on SMOS soil moisture retrieval over Canadian agricultural landscapes," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 8, No. 11, 5281-5293, 2015.
doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2417832

2. Zhu, G., et al., "Relative soil moisture in China's farmland," Journal of Geographical Sciences, Vol. 29, 334-350, 2019.
doi:10.1007/s11442-019-1601-6

3. Azimi, S., et al., "Understanding the benefit of Sentinel 1 and SMAP-era satellite soil moisture retrievals for flood forecasting in small basins: Effect of revisit time and the spatial resolution," Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 581, 2019.

4. Ma, S.-C., et al., "Effects of controlling soil moisture regime based on root-sourced signal characteristics on yield formation and water use efficiency of winter wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 221, 486-492, 2019.
doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.019

5. Dari, J., et al., "Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture: Addressing the monitoring at the catchment scale," Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 570, 2019.

6. Gao, Q., et al., "Synergetic use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data for soil moisture mapping at 100 m resolution," Sensors, Vol. 17, 1966, 2017.
doi:10.3390/s17091966

7. Paloscia, S., et al., "Soil moisture mapping using Sentinel-1 images: Algorithm and preliminary validation," Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 134, 234, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.027

8. Ulaby, F., et al., "Microwave Radar and Radiometric Remote Sensing," Artech House, 2014.

9. Dubois, P. C., J. V. Zyl, and T. Engman, "Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 33, No. 4, 915-926, 1995.
doi:10.1109/36.406677

10. Fung, A. K., Microwave Scattering and Emission Models and Their Applications, Artech House, 1994.

11. Oh, Y., K. Sarabandi, and F. Ulaby, "Semi-empirical model of the ensemble-averaged differential Mueller matrix for microwave backscattering from bare soil surfaces," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 40, 1348-1355, 2002.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2002.800232

12. Oh, Y., K. Sarabandi, and F. T. Ulaby, "An empirical-model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 30, 370-381, 1992.
doi:10.1109/36.134086

13. Kumar, A., et al., "Study of empirical approaches for retrieval of soil moisture in Solani river catchment area of Uttarakand, India," 2016 11th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), 481-485, 2016.
doi:10.1109/ICIINFS.2016.8262988

14. Baghdadi, N., et al., "Evaluation of radar backscattering models IEM, Oh, and Dubois for SAR data in X-band over bare soils," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 8, 1160-1164, 2011.
doi:10.1109/LGRS.2011.2158982

15. Baghdadi, N., et al., "A new empirical model for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces," Remote Sensing, Vol. 8, 920, 2016.
doi:10.3390/rs8110920

16. Sekertekin, A., A. Marangoz, and S. Abdikan, "ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 SAR data sensitivity analysis to surface soil moisture over bare and vegetated agricultural fields," Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 171, 1-11, 2020.

17. Santi, E., et al., "Remote sensing of forest biomass using GNSS reflectometry," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020.

18. Yuan, Q., et al., "Estimating surface soil moisture from satellite observations using a generalized regression neural network trained on sparse ground-based measurements in the continental U.S.," Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 580, 124351, 2020.

19. Achieng, K. O., "Modelling of soil moisture retention curve using machine learning techniques: Artificial and deep neural networks vs support vector regression models," Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 133, 104320, 2019.

20. Mirsoleimani, H., et al., "Bare soil surface moisture retrieval from Sentinel-1 SAR data based on the calibrated IEM and dubois models using neural networks," Sensors, Vol. 19, 3209, 2019.

21. Kweon, S. and Y. Oh, "Estimation of soil moisture and surface roughness from single-polarized radar data for bare soil surface and comparison with dual- and quad-polarization cases," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 52, No. 7, 4056-4064, 2014.

22. Picard, G., T. Le Toan, and F. Mattia, "Understanding C-band radar backscatter from wheat canopy using a multiple-scattering coherent model," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, 1583-1591, 2003.

23. Beckmann, P. and A. Spizzichino, The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves From Rough Surfaces, 511, Artech House, Inc., 1987.

24. Engman, E. and N. Chauhan, "Status of microwave soil moisture measurements with remote sensing," Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 51, 189-198, 1995.

25. Hallikainen, et al., "Microwave dielectric behavior of wet soil — Part 1: Empirical models and experimental observations," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 23, No. 1, 25-34, 1985.

26. Beauchemin, M., K. Thomson, and G. Edwards, "Modelling forest stands with MIMICS: Implications for calibration," Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 21, 518-526, 1995.

27. Baghdadi, N., M. Bernier, and R. Neeson, "Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping," International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 22, 71-88, 2001.

28. Baghdadi, N., N. Holah, and M. Zribi, "Soil moisture estimation using multi-incidence and multi-polarization ASAR SAR data," International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 27, 2006.

29. Santi, E., et al., "Application of artificial neural networks for the soil moisture retrieval from active and passive microwave spaceborne sensors," International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 48, 2015.