Vol. 93
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 117 [2026] PIERB 116 [2026] PIERB 115 [2025] PIERB 114 [2025] PIERB 113 [2025] PIERB 112 [2025] PIERB 111 [2025] PIERB 110 [2025] PIERB 109 [2024] PIERB 108 [2024] PIERB 107 [2024] PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2021-09-15
Four-Objective Optimization and Multi-Physical Field Coupling Analysis of Variable-Leakage-Flux Flux-Intensifying PM Machine
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 93, 151-168, 2021
Abstract
This article proposes a new type of variable-leakage-flux flux-intensifying permanent magnet (VLF-FIPM) machine and performs optimization and multi-physical field analysis on it. By designing leakage flux bypass and various magnetic barriers, the proposed machine has the variable-leakage-flux characteristic and reverse saliency characteristic of Ld>Lq. Firstly, the evolution process from the conventional interior permanent magnet (IPM) machine to the proposed machine is explained. Secondly, the output torque, torque ripple, core loss and reverse saliency ratio of the proposed machine are optimized by multi-objective comprehensive optimization method. Then the electromagnetic performance of the optimal machine is compared with that of the initial machine and conventional IPM machine. Finally, the temperature field and stress field of the optimal machine in different states are analyzed in detail. Both theoretical results and simulation analysis verify the effectiveness of the proposed design idea and optimization of the VLF-FIPM machine.
Citation
Xiping Liu, Longxin Du, Siting Zhu, and Jianwei Liang, "Four-Objective Optimization and Multi-Physical Field Coupling Analysis of Variable-Leakage-Flux Flux-Intensifying PM Machine," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 93, 151-168, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERB21080501
References

1. Dalal, A. and P. Kumar, "Design, prototyping, and testing of a dual-rotor motor for electric vehicle application," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 9, 7185-7192, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2018.2795586        Google Scholar

2. Pellegrino, G., A. Vagati, P. Guglielmi, and B. Boazzo, "Performance comparison between surface-mounted and interior PM motor drives for electric vehicle application," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 59, No. 2, 803-811, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2011.2151825        Google Scholar

3. Buyukdegirmenci, V. T., A. M. Bazzi, and P. T. Krein, "Evaluation of induction and permanent-magnet synchronous machines using drive-cycle energy and loss minimization in traction applications," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 50, No. 1, 395-403, 2014.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2013.2266352        Google Scholar

4. Liu, X., H. Chen, J. Zhao, and A. Belahcen, "Research on the performances and parameters of interior PMSM used for electric vehicles," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 63, No. 6, 3533-3545, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2016.2524415        Google Scholar

5. Huynh, T. A. and M. Hsieh, "Comparative study of PM-assisted SynRM and IPMSM on constant power speed range for EV applications," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 53, No. 11, 1-6, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2017.2707125        Google Scholar

6. Liu, Y., Z. Zhang, C. Wang, W. Geng, and H. Wang, "Electromagnetic performance analysis of a new hybrid excitation synchronous machine for electric vehicle applications," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 54, No. 11, 1-4, 2018.        Google Scholar

7. Ding, W., S. Yang, and Y. Hu, "Development and investigation on segmented-stator hybrid-excitation switched reluctance machines with different rotor pole numbers," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 5, 3784-3794, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2017.2760846        Google Scholar

8. Liu, X., M. Wang, D. Chen, and Q. Xie, "A variable flux axial field permanent magnet synchronous machine with a novel mechanical device," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 51, No. 11, 1-4, 2015.        Google Scholar

9. Sun, T., X. Liu, Y. Zou, C. Huang, and J. Liang, "Design and optimization of a mechanical variable-leakage-flux interior permanent magnet machinewith auxiliary rotatable magnetic poles," CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, 21-29, 2021.
doi:10.30941/CESTEMS.2021.00004        Google Scholar

10. Kato, T., M. Minowa, H. Hijikata, K. Akatsu, and R. D. Lorenz, "Design methodology for variable leakage flux IPM for automobile traction drives," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 51, No. 5, 3811-3821, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2015.2439642        Google Scholar

11. Athavale, A., T. Fukushige, T. Kato, C. Yu, and R. D. Lorenz, "Variable leakage flux IPMSMs for reduced losses over a driving cycle while maintaining suitable attributes for high-frequency injection-based rotor position self-sensing," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 52, No. 1, 234-241, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2015.2464190        Google Scholar

12. Fan, W., X. Zhu, L. Quan, W. Wu, L. Xu, and Y. Liu, "Flux-weakening capability enhancement design and optimization of a variable leakage flux multilayer barrier PM motor," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 68, No. 9, 7814-7825, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.3016253        Google Scholar

13. Limsuwan, N., T. Kato, K. Akatsu, and R. D. Lorenz, "Design and evaluation of a variable-flux flux-intensifying interior permanent-magnet machine," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1015-1024, 2014.
doi:10.1109/TIA.2013.2273482        Google Scholar

14. Zhu, X., W. Wu, S. Yang, Z. Xiang, and L. Quan, "Comparative design and analysis of new type of flux-intensifying interior permanent magnet motors with different Q-axis rotor flux barriers," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2260-2269, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2018.2837119        Google Scholar

15. Zhu, X., J. Huang, L. Quan, Z. Xiang, and B. Shi, "Comprehensive sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimization research of permanent magnet flux-intensifying motors," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2613-2627, 2019.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2018.2849961        Google Scholar

16. Sun, X., Z. Shi, G. Lei, Y. Guo, and J. Zhu, "Multi-objective design optimization of an IPMSM based on multilevel strategy," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 68, No. 1, 139-148, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.2965463        Google Scholar

17. Zhou, X., X. Zhu, W. Wu, Z. Xiang, Y. Liu, and L. Quan, "Multi-objective optimization design of variable-saliency-ratio PM motor considering driving cycles," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 68, No. 8, 6516-6526, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.3007106        Google Scholar

18. Du, L., X. Liu, J. Fu, J. Liang, and C. Huang, "Design and optimization of reverse salient permanent magnet synchronous motor based on controllable leakage flux," CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, 163-173, 2021.
doi:10.30941/CESTEMS.2021.00020        Google Scholar

19. Si, J., S. Zhao, H. Feng, Y. Hu, and W. Cao, "Analysis of temperature field for a surface-mounted and interior permanent magnet synchronous motor adopting magnetic-thermal coupling method," CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, Vol. 2, No. 1, 166-174, 2018.
doi:10.23919/TEMS.2018.8326464        Google Scholar