volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Linear Frequency Modulation (LFM) signals are widely used in radar and sonar technology. Many applications are interested in determining the source of an LFM signal. In recent years, the rapid development of machine learning has facilitated research in various fields, including signal recognition. The neural networks can extract the implicit features of the signals, which can help the system to sort and recognize the signal sources quickly and accurately. High performance of neural networks requires large amounts of high-quality labeled data. However, it is difficult and expensive to obtain a large amount of high-quality labeled data. Simultaneously, some features will be lost during data preprocessing, and feature extraction and classification tasks will be inefficient. The self supervised network is proposed in this paper for pre-training the signal waveform and fine-tuning the classification with a small amount of labeled data. The proposed method can extract more signal waveform features, save labeling costs, and has higher precision. This method can provide up to 99.7% recognition accuracy at 20 dB.

1. Galushko, V., "On application of taper windows for sidelobe suppression in LFM pulse compression," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 107, 259-271, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERC20081904 Google Scholar

2. Guo, Y. and L. Yang, "Method for parameter estimation of LFM signal and its application," IET Signal Process, Vol. 13, No. 5, 538-543, 2019.
doi:10.1049/iet-spr.2018.5435 Google Scholar

3. Li, H., Y. Han, Y. Cai, et al. "Overview of the crucial technology research for radar signal sorting," Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 27, No. 12, 2035-2040, 2005. Google Scholar

4. Zhang, M., L. Liu, and M. Diao, "LPI radar waveform recognition based on time-frequency distribution," Sensors, Vol. 16, No. 10, 1682, 2016.
doi:10.3390/s16101682 Google Scholar

5. Wang, S., C. Cao, X. Li, et al. "Intra-pulse modulation feature analysis for radar signals," Recent Trends in Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices: Proceedings of ICCD 2018, 819-825, Springer Singapore, 2020. Google Scholar

6. Han, S., H. Kim, S. Park, et al. "Efficient radar target recognition using a combination of range profile and time-frequency analysis," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 108, 131-140, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10071601 Google Scholar

7. Li, M., "Electronic radar signal recognition based on wavelet transform and convolutional neural network," 2022 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications Technology and Computer Science (ACCTCS), 470-474, IEEE, 2022. Google Scholar

8. Gao, Z., F. Cao, C. He, et al. "Network optimization algorithm for radar active jamming identification based on neural architecture search," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 126, 183-196, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22081806 Google Scholar

9. Zhu, H. and Q. Li, "Target classification by conventional radar based on bispectrum and deep CNN," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 130, 127-138, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22102401 Google Scholar

10. Yildirim, A. and S. Kiranyaz, "1D convolutional neural networks versus automatic classifiers for known LPI radar signals under white Gaussian noise," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 180534-180543, 2020.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027472 Google Scholar

11. Zbontar, J., L. Jing, I. Mistra, et al. "Barlow twins: Self-supervised learning via redundancy reduction," International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2021. Google Scholar

12. Ba, J., J. Kiros, and G. Hinton, "Layer normalization," arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016. Google Scholar

13. Hendrycks, D. and K. Gimpel, "Gaussian error linear units (gelus)," arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415, 2016. Google Scholar

14. Mohamed, A., D. Okhonko, and L. Zettlemoyer, "Transformers with convolutional context for ASR," arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.11660, 2019. Google Scholar

15. Baevski, A., M. Auli, and A. Mohamed, "Effectiveness of self-supervised pre-training for speech recognition," arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03912, 2019. Google Scholar

16. Alimuradov, A. and A. Tychkov, "EMD-based method to improve the efficiency of speech/pause segmentation," 2021 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON), 1-10, IEEE, 2021. Google Scholar

17. Devlin, J., M. Chang, K. Lee, et al. "Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding," arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. Google Scholar

18. O'Shea, T. J., J. Corgan, and T. Clancy, "Convolutional radio modulation recognition networks," Engineering Applications of Neural Networks: 17th International Conference, EANN 2016, 213-226, Springer International Publishing, Aberdeen, UK, September 2-5, 2016. Google Scholar

19. Fredieu, C., A. Martone, and R. Buehrer, "Open-set classification of common waveforms using a deep feed-forward network and binary isolation forest models," 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, 2022. Google Scholar

20. Xie, C., L. Zhang, and Z. Zhong, "Quasi-LFM radar waveform recognition based on fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency analysis," Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1130-1142, 2021.
doi:10.23919/JSEE.2021.000097 Google Scholar

21. Li, Y., G. Shao, and B. Wang, "Automatic modulation classification based on bispectrum and CNN," 2019 IEEE 8th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), 311-316, IEEE, 2019. Google Scholar

Mr. Tianqi Yang

Dr. Siya Mi