Vol. 117
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 117 [2026] PIERB 116 [2026] PIERB 115 [2025] PIERB 114 [2025] PIERB 113 [2025] PIERB 112 [2025] PIERB 111 [2025] PIERB 110 [2025] PIERB 109 [2024] PIERB 108 [2024] PIERB 107 [2024] PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2026-05-10
EM Field Comparison of Five Lightning Types: A Distance-Dependent Behavior with Implications for Protection Design
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 117, 123-134, 2026
Abstract
Lightning electromagnetic fields are essential inputs for protection system design, electromagnetic compatibility analysis, and lightning location system calibration. Although most computational studies rely on a single ``typical'' current waveform, real lightning exhibits significant variation in peak current, rise time, and temporal characteristics. This paper presents a systematic investigation of how return stroke current parameters influence radiated electromagnetic fields using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. Five representative waveforms are examined: typical subsequent stroke (12 kA, 40 kA/µs), first return stroke (28 kA, 12 kA/µs), severe subsequent stroke (25 kA, 80 kA/µs), fast-rising subsequent stroke (20 kA, 120 kA/µs), and rocket-triggered lightning (16 kA, 20 kA/µs). Simulations are performed over homogeneous ground (σ = 0.001 S/m, εr = 10). Electric and magnetic field components are computed at near-field (r = 50 m) and far-field (r = 5 km) distances, both underground (d = 2 m) and above ground (h = 10 m). Results show strongly distance-dependent behavior: at 50 m, current rise rate (di/dt) dominates, with fast-rising 16 kA strokes producing fields comparable to slower 22 kA events. At 5 km, peak current governs all components, with 28 kA first strokes producing fields 1.5-2× higher than subsequent strokes. Field attenuation from 50 m to 5 km varies from 130× to 3000× depending on waveform frequency content. The azimuthal magnetic field exhibits uniform attenuation (225-350×) and ground independence, supporting its use in lightning location systems. Triggered lightning underestimates severe natural strokes by 40-60% at 50 m, narrowing to 20-30% at 5 km. These findings indicate that worst-case protection scenarios must be distance-specific: fast-rising strokes govern buried infrastructure within 100 m, while first strokes dominate overhead systems beyond 1 km.
Citation
Imane Ghlib, Mohamed Omari, and Abdenbi Mimouni, "EM Field Comparison of Five Lightning Types: A Distance-Dependent Behavior with Implications for Protection Design," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 117, 123-134, 2026.
doi:10.2528/PIERB26031210
References

1. Cooray, Vernon, The Lightning Flash, No. 34, IET Power and Energy Series, London, U.K, 2003.
doi:10.1049/pbpo069e_ch4

2. Cummins, Kenneth L. and Martin J. Murphy, "An overview of lightning locating systems: History, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the U.S. NLDN," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 51, No. 3, 499-518, Aug. 2009.
doi:10.1109/temc.2009.2023450        Google Scholar

3. Yang, Ying, Qibin Zhou, Ruixuan Chen, Shuai Hou, and Xiaoyan Bian, "Simulation study of lightning indirect effects on electric vehicle," 2025 6th International Conference on Electrical, Electronic Information and Communication Engineering (EEICE), 479-482, Shenzhen, China, Apr. 2025.
doi:10.1109/EEICE65049.2025.11034361

4. Nicolopoulou, Eleni P., "Lightning surges in the electric network of a ship: A study with respect to equipment immunity levels," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, Vol. 11, No. 5, 12159-12171, Oct. 2025.
doi:10.1109/tte.2025.3586817        Google Scholar

5. Vu, Duc-Quang, Nhat-Nam Nguyen, Tinh-Minh T. Le, and Phan-Tu Vu, "Computing lightning-induced voltages on overhead distribution lines using the RBF-FDTD approach," IEEE Access, Vol. 13, 125473-125484, Jul. 2025.
doi:10.1109/access.2025.3588253        Google Scholar

6. Chen, Ruixuan, Shuai Hou, and Yifu Ding, "Numerical simulation analysis of the direct effects of lightning on electric vehicles," 2025 13th Asia-Pacific International Conference on Lightning (APL), 1-6, Bali, Indonesia, Jun. 2025.
doi:10.1109/APL65034.2025.11108895

7. Sadique, Shazna, G. Mrudula, Ajit Kumar Singh, and Sharon Varghese, "Study on indirect effects of lightning on aircraft using simulation," 2025 IEEE Space, Aerospace and Defence Conference (SPACE), 1-6, Bangalore, India, Jul. 2025.
doi:10.1109/SPACE65882.2025.11171133

8. Hou, Shuai, Yi Zhou, Yifu Ding, Tabor Xu, Yue Zhang, and Ruixuan Chen, "A review of lightning protection technologies for electric vehicles," 2025 2nd International Conference on Electrical Technology and Automation Engineering (ETAE), 542-548, Guangzhou, China, May 2025.
doi:10.1109/ETAE65337.2025.11089781

9. Tarimer, I. and B. Kuca, "An overview on the protection measures for air-port protection in high density lightning regions," Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, Vol. 19, No. 10, 29-32, 2013.
doi:10.5755/j01.eee.19.10.5832        Google Scholar

10. Tarimer, I., B. Kuca, and T. Kisielewicz, "A case study to risk assessment for protecting airports against lightening," Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika, Vol. 117, No. 1, 49-52, 2012.
doi:10.5755/j01.eee.117.1.1052        Google Scholar

11. Tarimer, I., C. Mazzetti, B. Kuca, and Z. Flisowski, "Considerations on efficiency for internal lightning protection," Advances in IT and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 33, 277-285, 2013.
doi:10.7862/re.2013.20        Google Scholar

12. Tarimer, Ilhan and Boleslaw Kuca, "The proposition to safety of a lightning protection system for high structures," TEM Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4, 309-313, 2013.
doi:10.18421/tem24-06        Google Scholar

13. Mimouni, Abdenbi, Farhad Rachidi, and Marcos Rubinstein, "Electromagnetic fields of a lightning return stroke in presence of a stratified ground," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 56, No. 2, 413-418, 2014.
doi:10.1109/temc.2013.2282995        Google Scholar

14. Omari, Mohamed and Abdenbi Mimouni, "Electromagnetic fields at very close range from a tower struck by lightning in presence of a horizontally stratified ground," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 61, No. 1, 166-173, 2019.
doi:10.1109/temc.2018.2790166        Google Scholar

15. Omari, Mohamed and Abdenbi Mimouni, "Electromagnetic fields at far distances from the peissenberg tower struck by lightning in presence of a horizontally stratified ground," 2018 34th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), 1-7, Rzeszow, Poland, Sep. 2018.
doi:10.1109/ICLP.2018.8503408

16. Omari, Mohamed and Imane Ghlib, "The vertical stratification (mixed propagation path: Land-lake) effect on the electromagnetic fileds of lightning initiated to the CN tower," 2022 2nd International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE), 1-5, Constantine, Algeria, Oct. 2022.
doi:10.1109/ICAEE53772.2022.9962055

17. Omari, Mohamed, Abdenbi Mimouni, and Imane Ghlib, "FDTD modeling of lightning electromagnetic fields over mixed and sloped domains using staircase approximation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 112, 29-41, 2025.
doi:10.2528/pierb25031704        Google Scholar

18. Li, Quanxin, Marcos Rubinstein, Jianguo Wang, Li Cai, Mi Zhou, Yadong Fan, and Farhad Rachidi, "On the influence of the soil stratification and frequency-dependent parameters on lightning electromagnetic fields," Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 178, 106047, Jan. 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2019.106047        Google Scholar

19. Rachidi, F., W. Janischewskyj, A. M. Hussein, C. A. Nucci, S. Guerrieri, B. Kordi, and Jen-Shih Chang, "Current and electromagnetic field associated with lightning-return strokes to tall towers," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 43, No. 3, 356-367, Aug. 2001.
doi:10.1109/15.942607        Google Scholar

20. Rakov, Vladimir A. and Martin A. Uman, Lightning: Physics and Effects, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

21. Nag, Amitabh, Martin J. Murphy, Wolfgang Schulz, and Kenneth L. Cummins, "Lightning locating systems: Insights on characteristics and validation techniques," Earth and Space Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, 65-93, 2015.
doi:10.1002/2014ea000051        Google Scholar

22. Rakov, Vladimir A., Martin A. Uman, and Rajeev Thottappillil, "Review of lightning properties from electric field and TV observations," Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 99, No. D5, 10745-10750, 1994.
doi:10.1029/93JD01205        Google Scholar

23. Yee, Kane, "Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 14, No. 3, 302-307, May 1966.
doi:10.1109/tap.1966.1138693        Google Scholar

24. Mur, Gerrit, "Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic-field equations," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 23, No. 4, 377-382, Nov. 1981.
doi:10.1109/temc.1981.303970        Google Scholar

25. Visacro, Silverio and Rafael Alipio, "Frequency dependence of soil parameters: Experimental results, predicting formula and influence on the lightning response of grounding electrodes," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 27, No. 2, 927-935, Apr. 2012.
doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2011.2179070        Google Scholar

26. Heidler, F., "Analytic lightning current functions for LEMP calculations," 18th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), 63-66, Munich, Germany, 1985.

27. Nucci, C. A., C. Mazzetti, F. Rachidi, and M. Ianoz, "On lightning return stroke models for LEMP calculations," 19th International Conference on Lightning Protection, 463-469, 1988.

28. Rachidi, F. and C. A. Nucci, "On the Master, Uman, Lin, Standler and the modified transmission line lightning return stroke current models," Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 95, No. D12, 20389-20393, Nov. 1990.
doi:10.1029/jd095id12p20389        Google Scholar