Vol. 99
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2020-12-07
Contrast in Specific Absorption Rate for a Typical Plant Model Due to Discrepancy Among Global and National Electromagnetic Standards
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 99, 139-152, 2021
Abstract
Different global and national electromagnetic regulatory standards have been developed based upon significantly diversified premises, developmental backgrounds and objectives to safeguard life. Some standards aim at minimizing short duration thermal effects, some try to mitigate non-thermal effects over prolonged duration and rest have adopted precautionary limits. As a consequence, these global and national electromagnetic standards substantially differ from each other. Moreover, in spite of lossy dielectric nature of plant tissues, electromagnetic energy absorption rate level estimations for a complete plant model have neither been reported in literature nor been considered while preparing safety standards. To this end, Specific Absorption Rate levels have been estimated for a typical Catharanthus roseus plant model --- typical geometric shape of the plant prototype has been modelled considering the most practical scenario. Detailed analyses on variation of Specific Absorption Rate levels due to wide discrepancy among the existing electromagnetic regulatory standards have been reported in a quantitative manner. This particular work encompasses dielectric properties measurement of different Catharanthus roseus plant samples, modelling a typical Catharanthus roseus plant containing leaves, flower and twig with appropriate dielectric properties defined, and finally the simulation-based investigations to estimate the variation in Specific Absorption Rate levels based on the contrasting electromagnetic exposure standards. Specific Absorption Rate levels have been reported at five different telecommunication bands as per two occupational and four public exposure scenarios. Variations among the estimated Specific Absorption Rate levels have been noted to be significant and presented in detail in this article. A total of thirty rigorous simulations have been carried out along with one hundred and twenty Specific Absorption Rate data evaluations to ensure accurate comparison among different electromagnetic standards. Noted vast variations among estimated Specific Absorption Rate levels based on contrasting electromagnetic standards over the frequencies indicate the necessity of re-evaluating all existing guidelines and also call for the need of maintaining a global uniformity among the existing electromagnetic standards worldwide.
Citation
Ardhendu Kundu Bhaskar Gupta Amirul Islam Mallick , "Contrast in Specific Absorption Rate for a Typical Plant Model Due to Discrepancy Among Global and National Electromagnetic Standards," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 99, 139-152, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20090404
http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pier.php?paper=20090404
References

1. Cleveland, Jr., R. F., D. M. Sylvar, and J. L. Ulcek, "Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields," FCC OET Bulletin, Vol. 65, Edition 97-01, Washington D.C., 1997.

2. ICNIRP, "Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz)," Health Phys., Vol. 118, No. 5, 483-524, 2020.
doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001210

3. IEEE, "IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz," IEEE Std C95.1-2019 (Revision of IEEE Std C95.1-2005/Incorporates IEEE Std C95.1-2019/Cor 1-2019), 1-312, United States, 2019.

4. DoT, Mobile Communication - Radio Waves & Safety, 1-15, India, 2012.

5. SAEFL, Electrosmog in the Environment, 1-56, Switzerland, 2005.

6. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, "SanPiN 2.1.8/2.2.4.1190-03: Arrangement and operation of land mobile radiocommunication facilities - Hygienic requirements,", 1-17, Russia, 2003.

7. The president of the council of ministers (Italy), "Establishment of exposure limits, attention values, and quality goals to protect the population against electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields generated at frequencies between 100 kHz and 300 GHz,", 1-6, unofficial translation by P. Vecchia, Italy, 2003.

8. Vecchia, P., "Radiofrequency fields: Bases for exposure limits," 2 European IRPA Congress on Radiation Protection - Radiation Protection: From Knowledge to Action, 1-19, Paris, 2006.

9. Mazar, H., "A global survey and comparison of different regulatory approaches to non-ionizing RADHAZ and spurious emissions," IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronics Systems (COMCAS), 1-6, Tel Aviv, 2009.

10. Kumar, G., Report on Cell Tower Radiation, submitted to secretary, 1-50, DoT, India, 2010.

11. Foster, K. R., "Exposure limits for radiofrequency energy: Three models," Proceedings of the Eastern European Regional EMF Meeting and Workshop (Criteria for EMF Standards Harmonization), 1-6, Varna, Bulgaria, 2001.

12. Stuchly, S. S., M. A. Stuchly, A. Kraszewski, and G. Hartsgrove, "Energy deposition in a model of man: Frequency effects," IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 7, 702-711, 1986.
doi:10.1109/TBME.1986.325761

13. Gultekin, D. H. and P. H. Siegel, "Absorption of 5G radiation in brain tissue as a function of frequency, power and time," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 115593-115612, 2020.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002183

14. Meier, K., V. Hombach, R. Kästle, R. Y. Tay, and N. Kuster, "The dependence of electromagnetic energy absorption upon human-head modelling at 1800 MHz," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 45, No. 11, 2058-2062, 1997.
doi:10.1109/22.644237

15. Christ, A., A. Klingenböck, T. Samaras, C. Goiceanu, and N. Kuster, "The dependence of electromagnetic far-field absorption on body tissue composition in the frequency range from 300 MHz to 6 GHz," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2188-2195, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2006.872789

16. Cooper, J., B. Marx, J. Buhl, and V. Hombach, "Determination of safety distance limits for a human near a cellular base station antenna, adopting the IEEE standard or ICNIRP guidelines," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 23, No. 6, 429-443, 2002.
doi:10.1002/bem.10037

17. Takei, R., T. Nagaoka, K. Saito, S. Watanabe, and M. Takahashi, "SAR variation due to exposure from a smartphone held at various positions near the torso," IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 59, No. 2, 747-53, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2016.2642201

18. Gandhi, O. P., "Yes the children are more exposed to radiofrequency energy from mobile telephones than adults," IEEE Access, Vol. 3, 985-988, 2015.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2438782

19. Karunarathna, M. A. A. and I. J. Dayawansa, "Energy absorption by the human body from RF and microwave emissions in Sri Lanka," Sri Lankan J. of Phys., Vol. 7, 35-47, 2006.
doi:10.4038/sljp.v7i0.207

20. Hirata, A., S. Kodera, J. Wang, and O. Fujiwara, "Dominant factors influencing whole-body average SAR due to far-field exposure in whole-body resonance frequency and GHz regions," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 28, No. 6, 484-487, 2007.
doi:10.1002/bem.20335

21. Hirata, A., N. Ito, O. Fujiwara, T. Nagaoka, and S. Watanabe, "Conservative estimation of whole-body-averaged SARs in infants with a homogeneous and simple-shaped phantom in the GHz region," Phys. in Med. and Biol., Vol. 53, No. 24, 7215-7223, 2008.
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/014

22. Iyama, T., T. Onishi, Y. Tarusawa, S. Uebayashi, and T. Nojima, "Novel specific absorption rate (SAR) measurement method using a flat solid phantom," IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 50, No. 1, 43-51, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.913216

23. Taguchi, K., L. Laakso, K. Aga, A. Hirata, Y. Diao, J. Chakarothai, and T. Kashiwa, "Relationship of external field strength with local and whole-body averaged specific absorption rates in anatomical human models," IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 70186-70196, 2018.

24. Wessapan, T., S. Srisawatdhisukul, and P. Rattanadecho, "Specific absorption rate and temperature distributions in human head subjected to mobile phone radiation at different frequencies," Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 55, No. 1-3, 347-359, 2012.
doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.09.027

25. Wessapan, T. and P. Rattanadecho, "Specific absorption rate and temperature increase in the human eye due to electromagnetic fields exposure at different frequencies," Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 64, 426-435, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.04.060

26. Kraszewski, A. W., S. Trabelsi, and S. O. Nelson, "Broadband microwave wheat permittivity measurement in free space," J. of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, Vol. 37, No. 1, 41-54, 2002.
doi:10.1080/08327823.2002.11688469

27. Wee, F. H., P. J. Soh, A. H. M. Suhaizal, H. Nornikman, and A. A. M. Ezanuddin, "Free space measurement technique on dielectric properties of agricultural residues at microwave frequencies," 2009 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC), 183-187, Belem, 2009.

28. Nelson, S. O., "Measuring dielectric properties of fresh fruits and vegetables," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2003, 46-49, Columbus, 2003.

29. Guo, W., S. O. Nelson, S. Trabelsi, and S. J. Kays, "10-1800 MHz dielectric properties of fresh apples during storage," J. of Food Engg., Vol. 83, No. 4, 562-569, 2007.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.009

30. Nelson, S. O. and S. Trabelsi, "Dielectric spectroscopy measurements on fruit, meat, and grain," Trans. of the ASABE, Vol. 51, No. 5, 1829-1834, 2008.
doi:10.13031/2013.25298

31. Kundu, A. and B. Gupta, "Broadband dielectric properties measurement of some vegetables and fruits using open ended coaxial probe technique," Proceedings of The 2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Energy and Communication (CIEC), 480-484, Kolkata, 2014.

32. Mavrovic, A., A. Roy, A. Royer, B. Filali, F. Boone, C. Pappas, and O. Sonnentag, "Dielectric characterization of vegetation at L band using an open-ended coaxial probe," Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3, 195-208, 2018.
doi:10.5194/gi-7-195-2018

33. Kundu, A., "Specific absorption rate evaluation in apple exposed to RF radiation from GSM mobile towers," IEEE Applied Electromagnetics Conference (AEMC) 2013, 1-2, Bhubaneswar, 2013.

34. Kundu, A., RF Energy Absorption in Plant Parts due to Cell Tower Radiation, Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, 2015.

35. Kundu, A. and B. Gupta, "SAR evaluation of apple as per FCC RF exposure guideline," Recent Development in Electrical, Electronics and Engineering Physics (RDE3P-2013), 152-156, MCKVIE, India, 2013.

36. Kundu, A. and B. Gupta, "Comparative SAR analysis of some Indian fruits as per the revised RF exposure guideline," IETE J. of Res., Vol. 60, No. 4, 296-302, 2014.
doi:10.1080/03772063.2014.961981

37. Kundu, A., B. Gupta, and A. I. Mallick, "SAR analysis in a typical bunch of grapes exposed to radio frequency radiation in Indian scenario," IEEE International Conference on Microelectronics, Computing and Communication (MicroCom2016), 1-5, India, 2016.

38. Kundu, A., B. Gupta, and A. I. Mallick, "Specific absorption rate calculation in a typical bunch of Sapodilla fruits (Manilkara zapota) as per revised Indian RF exposure guidelines," 3rd URSI Regional Conference on Radio Science (URSI-RCRS), URSI, India, 2017.

39. Kundu, A. and B. Gupta, "Review on cell tower radiation absorption in Indian flora and related consequences: A critical issue for sustainable telecom growth," National Conference on Sustainable Technology to Connect People with Nature, Kolkata, 2017.

40. Kundu, A., B. Gupta, and A. I. Mallick, "Specific absorption rate evaluation in a typical multilayer fruit: Coconut with twig due to electromagnetic radiation as per Indian standards," Microwave Review, Vol. 23, No. 2, 24-32, 2017.

41. Deschamps, G., "Impedance of an antenna in a conducting medium," IRE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 10, No. 5, 648-650, 1962.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1962.1137923

42. Liu, L., D. Xu, and Z. Jiang, "Improvement in dielectric measurement technique of open-ended coaxial line resonator method," Electronics Letters, Vol. 22, No. 7, 373-375, 1986.
doi:10.1049/el:19860254

43. Xu, D., L. Liu, and Z. Jiang, "Measurement of the dielectric properties of biological substances using an improved open-ended coaxial line resonator method," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 35, No. 12, 1424-1428, 1987.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.1987.1133870

44. Stuchly, M. A. and S. S. Stuchly, "Coaxial line reflection method for measuring dielectric properties of biological substances at radio and microwave frequencies - A review," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 29, No. 3, 176-183, 1980.
doi:10.1109/TIM.1980.4314902

45. Athey, T. W., M. A. Stuchly, and S. S. Stuchly, "Measurement of radio frequency permittivity of biological tissues with an open-ended coaxial line: Part I," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 30, No. 1, 82-86, 1982.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.1982.1131021

46. Zajíček, R., J. Vrba, and K. Novotný, "Evaluation of a reflection method on an open-ended coaxial line and its use in dielectric measurements," Acta Polytechnica, Vol. 46, No. 5, 50-54, 2006.

47. Zajíček, R., L. Oppl, and J. Vrba, "Broadband measurement of complex permittivity using reflection method and coaxial probes," Radioengineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, 14-19, 2008.

48. Bobowski, J. S. and T. Johnson, "Permittivity measurements of biological samples by an open-ended coaxial line," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 40, 159-183, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12022906

49. CST STUDIO SUITE 2014, https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/cst-studio-suite/, (Accessed Sept. 6, 2019).

50. Weiland, T., "A discretization method for the solution of Maxwell's equations for six-component fields," Electronics and Communications AEU, Vol. 31, No. 3, 116-120, 1977.

51. Clemens, M. and T. Weiland, "Discrete electromagnetism with the finite integration technique," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 32, 65-87, 2001.
doi:10.2528/PIER00080103

52., "IEC/IEEE International Standard - Determining the peak spatial-average specific absorption rate (SAR) in the human body from wireless communications devices, 30 MHz to 6 GHz - Part 1: General requirements for using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method for SAR calculations," IEC/IEEE 62704-1: 2017, 1-86, United States, 2017.

53. Bhattacharya, K., "On the dependence of charge density on surface curvature of an isolated conductor," Physica Scripta, Vol. 91, No. 3, 035501, 2016.
doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/3/035501

54. Jordan, E. C. and K. G. Balmain, Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems, 2nd Ed., PHI Learning, New Delhi, 2009.

55. Deshpande, M. D., C. R. Cockrell, F. B. Beck, E. Vedeler, and M. B. Koch, "Analysis of electromagnetic scattering from irregularly shaped, thin, metallic flat plates," NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server, NASA Technical Paper 3361, 1993.

56. Kundu, A., B. Gupta, and A. I. Mallick, "Dependence of electromagnetic energy distribution inside a typical multilayer fruit model on direction of arrival and polarization of incident field," 2019 IEEE Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO), 1-2, Reunion, 2019.