1. Taylor, C. D., R. S. Satterwhite, and C. W. Harrison, "The response of a terminated two-wire transmission line excited by a nonuniform electromagnetic field," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 13, No. 6, 987-989, 1965.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1965.1138574        Google Scholar

2. Agrawal, A. K., H. J. Price, and S. H. Gurbaxani, "Transient response of multiconductor transmission lines excited by a nonuniform electromagnetic field," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 22, No. 2, 119-129, 1980.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1980.303824        Google Scholar

3. Rachidi, F., "Formulation of the field-to-transmission coupling equations in terms of magnetic excitation field," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 35, 404-407, 1993.
doi:10.1109/15.277316        Google Scholar

4. Paul, C. D., Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines, Wiley, 1994.

5. Erdin, I., A. Dounavis, R. Achar, et al. "A SPICE model for incident field coupling to lossy multiconductor transmission lines," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 43, No. 4, 485-494, 2001.
doi:10.1109/15.974627        Google Scholar

6. Haase, H., J. Nitsch, and T. Steinmetz, "Transmission-line super theory: A new approach to an effective calculation of electromagnetic interactions," URSI Radio Science Bull., No. 307, 33-60, 2003.        Google Scholar

7. Tesche, F. M. and C. M. Bulter, "On the addition of EM field propagation and coupling effects in the BLT equation," Interaction Note, Vol. 588, 2004.        Google Scholar

8. Shinh, G. S., N. M. Nakhla, and R. Achar, "Fast transient analysis of incident field coupling to multiconductor transmission lines," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 48, No. 1, 57-73, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2006.870694        Google Scholar

9. Cheldavi, A. and P. Nayeri, "Analysis of V transmission lines response to external electromagnetic fields," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 8, 297-315, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER06093003        Google Scholar

10. Armenta, R. B. and C. D. Sarris, "Efficient evaluation of the terminal response of a twisted-wire pair excited by a plane-wave electromagnetic field," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 49, No. 3, 698-707, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.902177        Google Scholar

11. Xie, H., J. Wang, R. Fan, et al. "A hybrid FDTD-SPICE method for transmission lines excited by a nonuniform incident wave," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 51, No. 3, 811-817, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2009.2020913        Google Scholar

12. Xie, H., J. Wang, R. Fan, and Y. Liu, "Spice models for radiated and conducted susceptibility analyses of multiconductor shielded cables," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 103, 241-257, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10020506        Google Scholar

13. Capraro, G. T. and C. R. Paul, "A probabilistic approach to wire coupling interference prediction," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., 267-272, Zurich, Switzerland, 1981.

14. Ciccolella, A. and F. G. Canavero, "Statistical simulation of crosstalk in Bundles," Pro. 11th Int. Zurich Symp. EMC, 83-88, Zurich, Switzerland, 1995.

15. Bellan, D., S. A. Pignari, and G. Spadacini, "Characterisation of crosstalk in terms of mean value and standard deviation," Proc. IEE Sci. Meas. Technol., Vol. 150, No. 6, 289-295, 2003.
doi:10.1049/ip-smt:20030968        Google Scholar

16. Wu, M., D. Beetner, T. Hubing, et al. "Estimation of the statistical variation of crosstalk in wiring harnesses," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., 696-702, 2008.        Google Scholar

17. Sun, S., G. Liu, J. Drewniak, et al. "Hand-assembled cable bundle modeling for crosstalk and common-mode radiation prediction," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 49, No. 3, 708-718, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.897142        Google Scholar

18. Beetner, D. G., H. Weng, M. Wu, et al. "Validation of worst-case and statistical models for an automotive EMC expert system," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Electromagn. Compat., 2008.        Google Scholar

19. Bellan, D. and S. A. Pignari, "Efficient estimation of crosstalk statistics in random wire bundles with lacing cords," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 53, No. 1, 209-218, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2010.2093147        Google Scholar

20. Stievano, I. S., P. Manfredi, and F. G. Canavero, "Stochastic analysis of multiconductor cables and interconnects," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 53, No. 2, 501-507, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2011.2119488        Google Scholar

21. Morgan, M. A. and F. M. Tesche, "Basic statistical concepts for analysis of random cable coupling problems," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 26, No. 1, 185-187, 1978.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1978.1141807        Google Scholar

22. Parkinson, E. R. and P. H. Levy, "Monte carlo analysis of the EMP response of a random-lay cable," IEEE Trans. Nuclear Science, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1920-1923, 1982.
doi:10.1109/TNS.1982.4336471        Google Scholar

23. Nuno, L. and C. L. Holloway, "Numerical investigation of the induced voltage on a cable placed at random locations inside a metallic enclosure," Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat. Europe, 2008.        Google Scholar

24. Paletta, L., J. P. Parmantier, F. Issac, et al. "Susceptibility analysis of wiring in a complex system combining a 3-D solver and a transmission-line network simulation," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 44, No. 2, 309-317, 2002.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2002.1003395        Google Scholar

25. Baum, C. E., T. K. Liu, and F. M. Tesche, "On the analysis of general multiconductor transmission-line networks," Interaction Note, Vol. 350, 1978.        Google Scholar

26. Tesche, F. M., M. V. Ianoz, and T. Karlsson, EMC Analysis Methods and Computational Models, Wiley, 1997.

27. Paul, C. R., "A SPICE model for multiconductor transmission lines excited by an incident electromagnetic field," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 36, No. 4, 342-354, 1994.
doi:10.1109/15.328864        Google Scholar