2014-08-26
A Recursive Approach to Improve the Image Quality in Well-Logging Environments
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 60, 287-300, 2014
Abstract
A three-stage recursive approach is proposed to improve the recovered distribution of electric parameters in a well-logging environment. The first stage is executed using the conventional linear sampling method (LSM) and the contrast source inversion (CSI) method. In the second stage, the background distribution is updated to better identify the target shape, using the recovered results in the first stage. In the third stage, the background distribution is made closer to the results in stage two, which improves the recovered distribution near the target boundary. The effect of noise is also simulated.
Citation
Yu-Hsin Kuo, and Jean-Fu Kiang, "A Recursive Approach to Improve the Image Quality in Well-Logging Environments," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 60, 287-300, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIERB14061302
References

1. L., Crocco, I. Catapano, L. D. Donato, and T. Isernia, "The linear sampling method as a way to quantitative inverse scattering," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 60, No. 4, 1844-1853, April 2012.        Google Scholar

2. Catapano, I., L. Crocco, and T. Isernia, "Improved sampling methods for shape reconstruction of 3-D buried targets," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 46, No. 10, 3265-3273, October 2008.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.921745        Google Scholar

3. Constable, S. C., R. L. Parker, and C. G. Constable, "The linear sampling method in inverse electromagnetic scattering theory," Inverse Problems, Vol. 19, No. 6, S105-137, 2003.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/057        Google Scholar

4. Gilmore, C., A. Abubakar, W. Hu, T. M. Habashy, and P. M. van den Berg, "Microwave biomedical data inversion using the finite-difference contrast source inversion method," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 57, No. 5, 1528-1538, May 2009.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2009.2016728        Google Scholar

5. Abubakar, A., W. Hu, P. M. van den Berg, and T. M. Habashy, "A finite-difference contrast source inversion method," Inverse Problems, Vol. 24, 065004, 2008.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/24/6/065004        Google Scholar

6. Van den Berg, P. M. and R. E. Kleinman, "A contrast source inversion method," Inverse Problems, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1607-1620, 1997.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/13/6/013        Google Scholar

7. Abubaker, A., P. M. van den Berh, and J. J. Mallorqui, "Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. 50, No. 7, 1761-1771, July 2002.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2002.800427        Google Scholar

8. Gilmore, C., P. Mojabi, and J. LoVetri, "Comparison of an enhanced distorted Born iterative method and the multiplicative-regularized contrast source inversion method," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 57, No. 8, 2341-2350, August 2009.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2009.2024478        Google Scholar

9. Binley, A. and A. Kemna, "DC resistivity and induced polarization methods," Hydrogeophy., Vol. 50, 129-156, 2005.
doi:10.1007/1-4020-3102-5_5        Google Scholar

10. Ernst, J. R., H. Maurer, A. G. Green, and K. Holloger, "Full-waveform inversion of crosshole radar data based on 2-D finite-difference time-domain solution of Maxwell’s equations," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 45, No. 9, 2807-2826, September 2007.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2007.901048        Google Scholar

11. Pralat, A. and R. Zdunek, "Electromagnetic geotomography-selection of measuring frequency," IEEE Sens. J., Vol. 5, No. 2, 242-250, April 2005.
doi:10.1109/JSEN.2005.843897        Google Scholar

12. Spies, B. R., "Electrical and electromagnetic borehole measurement: A review," Survey Geophys., Vol. 17, 517-556, 1996.
doi:10.1007/BF01901643        Google Scholar

13. Zhou, H., M. Sato, T. Takenaka, and G. Li, "Reconstruction from antenna-transformed radar data using a time-domain reconstruction method," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 45, No. 9, 689-696, March 2007.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.888140        Google Scholar

14. Meles, G. A., J. V. der Kruk, S. A. Greenhalgh, J. R. Ernst, H. Murer, and A. G. Green, "A new vector waveform inversion algorithm for simultaneous updating of conductivity and permittivity parameters from combination crosshole/borehole-to-surface GPR data," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 48, No. 9, 3391-3407, September 2010.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2046670        Google Scholar

15. Jesch, R. L. and R. H. McLaughlin, "Dielectric measurements of oil shale as functions of temperature and frequency," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 39, No. 12, 2713-2721, December 2001.
doi:10.1109/36.975005        Google Scholar

16. Schon, J. H., Physical Properties of Rocks, Elsevier, 2011.

17. Dyni, J. R., "Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits," U.S. Geolog. Survey Sci. Investig. Rep., 2006.        Google Scholar