volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

High-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) radiated from both primary and secondary currents, which are induced by a nuclear explosion, is computed by using the Jefimenko's equation. The effects of geomagnetic field is considered in computing the primary current, and the rough sea surface is considered in computing the reflected electric field in the frequency domain. The waveforms of HEMP near sea surface and a few km above it are simulated. The impulse and pulse characteristics are discussed, as well as the variation of peak field magnitude when the observation point is moved away from beneath the burst point.

1. Prather, W. D., D. V. Giri, R. L. Gardner, F. M. Tesche, R L. Hutchins, and J. C. Giles, "Early developments in sensors and simulators at the Air Force Weapons Laboratory," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 55, No. 3, 431-439, June 2013.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2013.2247767 Google Scholar

2. Sabath, F. and S. Potthast, "Tolerance values and the confidence level for high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) field tests," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 55, No. 3, 518-525, June 2013.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2012.2237032 Google Scholar

3. Karzas, W. J. and R. Latter, "Detection of the electromagnetic radiation from nuclear explosions in space," Phys. Rev., Vol. 137, No. 5B, 1369-1378, 1965.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137.B1369 Google Scholar

4. Longmire, C. L., "On the electromagnetic pulse produced by nuclear explosions," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 20, No. 1, 3-12, Feb. 1978.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1978.303688 Google Scholar

5. Jump, M. E. and W. C. Emberson, "Ship EMP survivability trials-reply," Naval Eng. J., Vol. 103, No. 4, 119-120, July 1991. Google Scholar

6. Department of Defense Standard Practice "Shipboard bonding, grounding, and other techniques for electromagnetic compatibility, electromagnetic pulse (EMP) mitigation, and safety," MIL-STD-1310H (NAVY), September 2009. Google Scholar

7. Graham, W. R., J. S. Foster, E. Gjelde, R. J. Hermann, H. M. Kluepfel, R. L. Lawson, G. K. Soper, L. L. Wood, and J. B. Woodart, "Report of the commission to assess the threat to the US from an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack," US Congress Commission, 2008. Google Scholar

8. Prather, W. D., J. Cafferky, L. Ortiz, and J. Anderson, "CW measurements of electromagnetic shields," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat.,, Vol. 55, No. 3, 500-507, June 2013.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2012.2237553 Google Scholar

9. Perez, R., Handbook of Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1st Ed., Academic Press, 1995.

10. Said, M. O., "Theory and practice of total ship survivability for ship design," Naval Eng. J., Vol. 107, No. 4, 191-203, July 1995.
doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.1995.tb03085.x Google Scholar

11. Haag, K., et al. "EMP design guidelines for naval ship systems," IIT Res. Inst., Chicago IL, 1975. Google Scholar

12. Ianoz, M., B. Nicoara, and W. Radasky, "Modeling of an EMP conducted environment," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 38, No. 3, 400-413, August 1996.
doi:10.1109/15.536070 Google Scholar

13. Deadrick, F. J., et al. "EMP coupling to ships," Lawrence Livermore Lab., 1980. Google Scholar

14. Cai, M., H. Wan, S. Tang, and P. Xu, "Research on electromagnetic environment above board of ship radiated by HEMP," Int. Conf. Electron. Mech. Eng. Info. Technol., 3442-3444, August 2011. Google Scholar

15. Seiler, Jr., L. W., "A calculational model for high altitude EMP,", Air Force Inst. Technol., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, March 1975. Google Scholar

16. Meng, C., "Numerical simulation of the HEMP environment," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 55, No. 3, 440-445, June 2013.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2013.2258024 Google Scholar

17. Wei, H.-C. and J.-F. Kiang, "Near-ground transient field of a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) considering nonlinear air conductivity and ground reflection," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 48, 45-54, 2016.
doi:10.2528/PIERM16021901 Google Scholar

18. Jefimenko, O. D., Electromagnetic Retardation and Theory of Relativity, Electret Scientific, 2004.

19. Ohmori, S., A. Irimata, H. Morikawa, K. Kondo, Y. Hase, and S. Miura, "Characteristics of sea reflection fading in maritime satellite communications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 33, No. 8, 838-845, August 1985.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1985.1143680 Google Scholar

20. Sobieski, P., A. Guissard, C. Baufays, and P. Siraut, "Sea surface scattering calculations in maritime satellite communications," IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 41, No. 10, 1525-1533, October 1993.
doi:10.1109/26.237887 Google Scholar

21. Benhmammouch, O., A. Khenchaf, and N. Caouren, "Modelling roughness effects on propagation of electromagnetic waves in a maritime environment: A hybrid approach," IET Radar, Sonar, Navig., Vol. 5, No. 9, 1018-1025, December 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0078 Google Scholar

22. Vicen-Bueno, R., R. Carrasco-Alvarez, M. P. Jarabo-Amores, J. C. Nieto-Borge, and M. Rosa-Zurera, "Ship detection by different data," IET Radar, Sonar, Navig., Vol. 5, No. 2, 144-154, October 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2010.0001 Google Scholar

23. Sevgi, L., "Target reflectivity and RCS interactions in integrated maritime surveillance systems based on surface-wave high-frequency radars," IEEE Antennas Propagat. Mag., Vol. 43, No. 1, 36-51, February 2001.
doi:10.1109/74.920017 Google Scholar

24. Levy, M., Parabolic Equation Methods for Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Inst. Electr. Eng., 2000.
doi:10.1049/PBEW045E

25. Miller, A. R., R. M. Brown, and E. Vegh, "New derivation for the rough-surface reflection coefficient and for the distribution of sea-wave elevations," IEE Proc. H: Microwaves Opt. Antennas, Vol. 131, No. 2, 114-116, 1984.
doi:10.1049/ip-h-1.1984.0022 Google Scholar

Dr. Hong-Cheng Wei

Prof. Jean-Fu Kiang