volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Radar holography has been established as an effective image reconstruction process by which the measured diffraction pattern across an aperture provides information about a threedimensional target scene of interest. In general, the sampling and reconstruction of radar holographic images are computationally expensive. Imaging can be made more efficient with the use of sparse sampling techniques and appropriate interpolation algorithms. Through extensive simulation and experimentation, we show that simple interpolation of sparsely-sampled target scenes provides a quick and reliable approach to reconstruct sparse datasets for accurate image reconstruction leading to reliable concealed target detection and recognition. For scanning radar applications, data collection time can be drastically reduced through application of sparse sampling. This reduced scan time will typically benefit a real-time system by allowing improvements in processing speed and timeliness of decision-making algorithms. An added advantage is the reduction of required data storage. Experimental holographic data are sparsely sampled over a two-dimensional aperture and reconstructed using numerical interpolation techniques. Extensive experimental evaluation of this new technique of interpolation-based sparse sampling strategies suggests that reduced sampling rates do not degrade the objective quality of holograms of concealed objects.

1. Sheen, D. M., D. L. McMakin, and T. E. Hall, "Three-dimensional millimeter-wave imaging for concealed weapon detection," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. 49, No. 9, 1581-1592, Sep. 2001.
doi:10.1109/22.942570 Google Scholar

2. Goodman, J. W., Introduction to Fourier Optics, McGraw-Hill, 1968.

3. Brady, D. J., K. Choi, D. L. Marks, R. Horisaki, and S. Lim, "Compressive holography," Opt. Express, Vol. 17, No. 15, 13040-13049, Jul. 20, 2009.
doi:10.1364/OE.17.013040 Google Scholar

4. Candes, E. and J. Romberg, "Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling," Inverse Prob., Vol. 23, No. 3, 969-985, Jun. 2007.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/008 Google Scholar

5. Rivenson, Y. and A. Stern, "Compressive sensing techniques in holography," Proc. 10th Euro- Am. Workshop Inf. Opt. (WIO), Benicassim, Spain, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1109/WIO.2011.5981451. Google Scholar

6. Hald, J., "Wideband acoustical holography," Proc. 43rd Int. Congress Noise Control Eng., 44-56, Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 2014. Google Scholar

7. Qiao, L., Y. Wang, Z. Shen, Z. Zhao, and Z. Chen, "Compressive sensing for direct millimeter-wave holographic imaging," Appl. Opt., Vol. 54, No. 11, 3280-3289, Apr. 10, 2015.
doi:10.1364/AO.54.003280 Google Scholar

8. Cull, C. F., D. A. Wikner, J. N. Mait, M. Mattheiss, and D. J. Brady, "Millimeter-wave compressive holography," Appl. Opt., Vol. 49, No. 19, E67-E82, Jul. 1, 2010.
doi:10.1364/AO.49.000E67 Google Scholar

9. Martinez-Lorenzo, J. A., F. Quivira, and C. M. Rappaport, "SAR imaging of suicide bombers wearing concealed explosive threats," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 125, 255-272, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIER11120518 Google Scholar

10. Demirci, S., H. Cetinkaya, E. Yigit, C. Ozdemir, and A. Vertiy, "A study on millimeter- wave imaging of concealed objects: application using back-projection algorithm," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 128, 457-477, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIER12050210 Google Scholar

11. Harmer, S. W., N. J. Bowring, N. D. Rezgui, and D. Andrews, "A comparison of ultra wide band conventional and direct detection radar for concealed human carried explosives detection," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 39, 37-47, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIERL13012508 Google Scholar

12. Yurduseven, O., "Indirect microwave holographic imaging of concealed ordnance for airport security imaging systems," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 146, 7-13, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIER14032304 Google Scholar

13. Wilson, S. A. and R. M. Narayanan, "Compressive wideband microwave radar holography," Proc. SPIE Conf. Radar Sensor Technol. XVIII, 907707-1-907707-8, Baltimore, MD, May 2014. Google Scholar

14. Wilson, S. A., R. M. Narayanan, and M. Rangaswamy, "Wideband imaging of concealed objects using compressive radar holography," Proc. IEEE Int. Radar Conf., 925-930, Arlington, VA, May 2015. Google Scholar

15. Gabor, D., "A new microscopic principle," Nat., Vol. 161, No. 4098, 777-778, May 15, 1948.
doi:10.1038/161777a0 Google Scholar

16. Soumekh, M., "Bistatic synthetic aperture radar inversion with application in dynamic object imaging," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Vol. 39, No. 9, 2044-2055, Sep. 1991.
doi:10.1109/78.134436 Google Scholar

17. Ida, Y., K. Hayashi, and K. Ami, "The effect of reference's phase on radio-frequency holographic imaging," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 30, No. 6, 1216-1221, Nov. 1982.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1982.1142942 Google Scholar

18. Ivashov, S., V. Razevig, A. Sheyko, I. Vasilyev, A. Zhuravlev, and T. Bechtel, "Holographic subsurface radar technique and its applications," Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Ground Penetrating Radar, 1-11, Birmingham, UK, Jun. 2008. Google Scholar

19. Collins, H. D., D. M. Sheen, T. E. Hall, and R. P. Gribble, "UWB radar holography applied to RCS signature reduction of military vehicles," Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestr. Eval., Vol. 16, 703-707, 1997.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_92 Google Scholar

20. Zhuravlev, A., S. Ivashov, V. Razevig, I. Vasiliev, and T. Bechtel, "Shallow depth subsurface imaging with microwave holography," Proc. SPIE Conf. Detect. Sens. Mines, Explos. Objects, and Obscured Targets XIX, 90720X-1-90720X-9, Baltimore, MD, May 2014. Google Scholar

21. Hunt, J., J. Gollub, T. Driscoll, G. Lipworth, A. Mrozack, M. S. Reynolds, D. J. Brady, and D. R. Smith, "Metamaterial microwave holographic imaging system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 31, No. 10, 2109-2119, Oct. 2014.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.31.002109 Google Scholar

22. Thevenaz, P., T. Blu, and M. Unser, "Image interpolation and resampling," Handbook of Medical Image Processing and Analysis, 2nd Edition, 465-493, edited by I. N. Bankman, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2009. Google Scholar

23. Lehmann, T. M., C. Gonner, and K. Spitzer, "Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. 18, No. 11, 1049-1075, Nov. 1999.
doi:10.1109/42.816070 Google Scholar

24. Thevenaz, P., T. Blu, and M. Unser, "Interpolation revisited," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. 19, No. 7, 739-758, Jul. 2000.
doi:10.1109/42.875199 Google Scholar

25. Keys, R., "Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing," IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., Vol. 29, No. 6, 1153-1160, Dec. 1981.
doi:10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163711 Google Scholar

26. Herman, G. T., S. W. Rowland, and M.-M. Yau, "A comparative study of the use of linear and modi¯ed cubic spline interpolation for image reconstruction," IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., Vol. 26, No. 2, 2879-2984, Apr. 1979.
doi:10.1109/TNS.1979.4330555 Google Scholar

27. Hou, H. S. and H. Andrews, "Cubic splines for image interpolation and digital filtering," IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., Vol. 26, No. 6, 508-517, Dec. 1978.
doi:10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163154 Google Scholar

28. Parker, J. A., R. V. Kenyon, and D. E. Troxel, "Comparison of interpolating methods for image resampling," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. 2, No. 1, 31-39, Mar. 1983.
doi:10.1109/TMI.1983.4307610 Google Scholar

29. Donoho, D. L. and J. Tanner, "Precise undersampling theorems," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 98, No. 6, 913-924, Jun. 2010.
doi:10.1109/JPROC.2010.2045630 Google Scholar

30. Donoho, D. L., "Compressed sensing," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1289-1306, Apr. 2006.
doi:10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 Google Scholar

31. Candes, E. J. and M. B. Wakin, "An introduction to compressive sampling," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., Vol. 25, No. 2, 21-30, Mar. 2008.
doi:10.1109/MSP.2007.914731 Google Scholar

32. Rivenson, Y. and A. Stern, "Compressive holography," Optical Compressive Imaging, 155-176, edited by A. Stern, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2017. Google Scholar

33. Keep, D. N., "Frequency-modulation radar for use in the mercantile marine," Proc. IEE --- Part B: Radio Electron. Eng., Vol. 103, No. 10, 519-523, Jul. 1956.
doi:10.1049/pi-b-1.1956.0203 Google Scholar

34. Jahne, B., Digital Image Processing: Concepts, Algorithms, and Scientific Applications, 3rd Ed., Springer-Verlag, 2002.

35. Du, K., H. Han, and G. Wang, "A new algorithm for removing compression artifacts of wavelet- based image," Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Autom. Eng. (CSAE), 336-340, Shanghai, China, Jun. 2011. Google Scholar

36. Akey, M. L. and O. R. Mitchell, "Detection and sub-pixel location of objects in digitized aerial imagery," Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit., 411-414, Montreal, Canada, Jul.-Aug. 1984. Google Scholar

37. Daniels, D. J., D. J. Gunton, and H. F. Scott, "Introduction to subsurface radar," IEE Proc. Part F: Radar Signal Process., Vol. 135, No. 4, 278-320, Aug. 1988.
doi:10.1049/ip-f-1.1988.0038 Google Scholar

38. Moura, J. M. F. and Y. Jin, "Detection by time reversal: Single antenna," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Vol. 55, No. 1, 187-201, Jan. 2007.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2006.882114 Google Scholar

Prof. Ram M. Narayanan

Dr. Scott A. Wilson

Dr. Muralidhar Rangaswamy