volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Numerical dispersion is the main error source of the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. In this paper, an optimized piecewise linear recursive convolution (PLRC) FDTD method with low numerical dispersion is presented first time for electromagnetic-wave propagation in anisotropic magnetized plasma. An optimized difference item which can achieve better approximation to the partial differential operator from transform domain is induced in this algorithm which decreases numerical dispersion. The item can be regarded as adding a correcting coefficient to conventional central difference format. And it is easy for programming and implementation. Numerical examples of electromagnetic pulse wave propagating in plasma demonstrate that the proposed optimized PLRC-FDTD method can not only reduce the numerical dispersion, but also improve precision, saving computational memory and computational time compared with the conventional PLRC-FDTD method. Same accuracy can be achieved when the spatial mesh size for the optimized PLRC-FDTD method is 2 times coarser as that in the conventional PLRC-FDTD method, corresponding to the computation time consumed in the optimized method is only 1/2 as that in the conventional one.

1. Yee, K., "A numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 14, No. 3, 302-307, 1966.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693 Google Scholar

2. Namiki, T., "A new FDTD algorithm based on alternating direction implicit method," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 47, No. 10, 2003-2007, 1999.
doi:10.1109/22.795075 Google Scholar

3. Liu, Q., "The PSTD algorithm: A time-domain method requiring only two cells per wavelength," Microw Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 3, 158-165, 1997.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(19970620)15:3<158::AID-MOP11>3.0.CO;2-3 Google Scholar

4. Krumpholz, M. and L. Katehi, "MRTD: New time-domain schemes based on multiresolution analysis," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 44, No. 4, 555-571, 1996.
doi:10.1109/22.491023 Google Scholar

5. Shlager, K. and J. Schneider, "Comparison of the dispersion properties of several low-dispersion finite-difference time-domain algorithms," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 51, No. 3, 642-653, 2003.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.808532 Google Scholar

6. Luebbers, R. J., F. Hunsberger, and K. S. Kunz, "A frequency-dependent finite-difference time-domain formulation for transient propagation in plasma," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 39, No. 1, 29-34, 1991.
doi:10.1109/8.64431 Google Scholar

7. Chen, Q., M. Katsurai, and P. H. Aoyagi, "An FDTD formulation for dispersive media using a current density," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 46, No. 11, 1739-1746, 1998.
doi:10.1109/8.736632 Google Scholar

8. Alsunaidi, M. A. and A. A. Al-Jabr, "A general ADE-FDTD algorithm for the simulation of dispersive structures," IEEE Photon Technol. Lett., Vol. 21, No. 12, 817-819, 2009.
doi:10.1109/LPT.2009.2018638 Google Scholar

9. Kelley, D. F. and R. J. Luebbers, "Piecewise linear recursive convolution for dispersive media using FDTD," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 44, No. 6, 792-797, 1996.
doi:10.1109/8.509882 Google Scholar

10. Young, J. L., "A higher order FDTD method for EM propagation in a collisionless cold plasma," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 44, No. 9, 1283-1289, 1996.
doi:10.1109/8.535387 Google Scholar

11. Prokopidis, K. P. and T. D. Tsiboukis, "Higher-order FDTD (2, 4) scheme for accurate simulations in lossy dielectrics," Electron. Lett., Vol. 39, No. 11, 835-836, 2003.
doi:10.1049/el:20030545 Google Scholar

12. Prokopidis, K. P., E. P. Kosmidou, and T. D. Tsiboukis, "An FDTD algorithm for wave propagation in dispersive media using higher-order schemes," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 18, No. 9, 1171-1194, 2004.
doi:10.1163/1569393042955306 Google Scholar

13. Jung, I., I.-Y. Oh, Y. Hong, and J.-G. Yook, "Optimized higher order 3-D (2, 4) FDTD scheme for isotropic dispersion in plasma," Asia-Pacific Micro Conference Proceed, 2013. Google Scholar

14. Lee, J. H. and D. K. Kalluri, "Three-dimensional FDTD simulation of electromagnetic wave transformation in a dynamic inhomogeneous magnetized plasma," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 47, No. 7, 1146-1151, 1999.
doi:10.1109/8.785745 Google Scholar

15. Liu, S., J. Mo, and N. Yuan, "Piecewise linear current density recursive convolution FDTD implementation for anisotropic magnetized plasmas," IEEE Microw Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 5, 222-224, 2004.
doi:10.1109/LMWC.2004.827844 Google Scholar

16. Zygiridis, T. T. and T. O. Tsiboukis, "Low-dispersion algorithms based on the higher order (2, 4) FDTD method," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 52, No. 4, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2004.825695 Google Scholar

17. Fei, X., T. X. Hong, and Z. X. Jing, "3-D optimal finite difference time domain method," Journ. Micro., Vol. 22, No. 5, 7-10, 2006. Google Scholar

18. Taflove, A. and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 3rd Ed., Artech House, 2005.

19. Fei, X., T. X. Hong, and Z. X. Jing, "The construction of low-dispersive FDTD on hexagon," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 53, No. 11, 3697-3703, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2005.858595 Google Scholar

Dr. Jinchao Ding

Professor Zhiqin Zhao

Dr. Yue Yang

Dr. Yulang Liu

Professor Zai-Ping Nie