volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

In order to reduce far-end crosstalk between two differential line pairs of microstrip, this paper proposes a method of reducing far end crosstalk by polarity inversion. In this way, the signal line is placed in the middle of PAD of one capacitor to achieve polarity reversal at the AC coupling capacitor of the differential line. The simulation results show that, in this way, the far end crosstalk can be reduced by 63.6%, and this method of far end crosstalk suppression has an effect on both pairs of differential lines.

1. Shao, J. and Z. Jie, "Design of a high density connector for high-speed backplane," Chinese Journal of Electron Devices, Vol. 39, No. 2, 291-297, Apr. 2016. Google Scholar

2. Huang, B., X.-B. Li, Z. Zeng, et al. "Study on signal integrity analysis method for electrical connector," Instrument Technique and Sensor, No. 5, 95-99, May 2017. Google Scholar

3. Wang, Y., Y. Zhao, and X. Li, "Crosstalk suppression by applying multilevel transmission," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 81, 45-50, 2019.
doi:10.2528/PIERL19030502 Google Scholar

4. Mudavath, R. and B. R. Naik, "Estimation of far end crosstalk and near end crosstalk noise with mutually coupled RLC interconnect models," 2018 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), 182-185, Chennai, 2018.
doi:10.1109/ICCSP.2018.8524191 Google Scholar

5. Chhay, S. K., R. K. Kunze, and Y. Chu, "Crosstalk mitigation in dense microstrip wiring using stubby lines," 2013 IEEE 22nd Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, 231-234, San Jose, CA, 2013. Google Scholar

6. Ye, X., K. Xiao, and R. Enriquez, "Differential far-end crosstalk cancellation --- Implementations and challenges," 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 193-198, Pittsburgh, PA, 2012.
doi:10.1109/ISEMC.2012.6351785 Google Scholar

7. Enriquez, R., K. Xiao, B. Lee, and M. Tlaxcalteco, "Differential symmetry principle for differential crosstalk cancellation," 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 730-734, Denver, CO, 2013. Google Scholar

8. Wang, Y. and X. Li, "Crosstalk cancellation method based on unitary transformation of coupled transmission lines-channel transmission matrix," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 52, 45-50, 2015.
doi:10.2528/PIERL15011602 Google Scholar

9. Tani, L. and N. E. Ouazzani, "Minimizing crosstalk on printed circuit board using non uniform guard traces," 2016 International Conference on Information Technology for Organizations Development (IT4OD), 1-4, Fez, 2016. Google Scholar

10. Lee, B., et al. "Design optimization for minimal crosstalk in differential interconnect," Proceeding of the DesignCon, 1263-1292, 2012. Google Scholar

11. Fan, J., A. Hardock, R. Rimolo-Donadio, S. Müller, Y. H. Kwark, and C. Schuster, "Signal integrity: Efficient, physics-based via modeling: Return path, impedance, and stub effect control," IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, Vol. 3, No. 1, 76-84, 1st Quarter, 2014.
doi:10.1109/MEMC.2014.6798802 Google Scholar

12. Wu, N. and F. K. Wu, "A design method for reducing the influence of crosstalk between high speed differential pairs,", C.N. Patent 104182576, May 3, 2017. Google Scholar

13. Ye, X. N., "Differential signal crosstalk reduction,", U.S. Patent 8624687, 2014. Google Scholar

14. Ye, X. N., "Signal routing with reduced crosstalk,", U.S. Patent 9893761, 2018. Google Scholar

15. Bogatin, E., Signal and Power Integrity --- Simplified, Prentice Hall PTR, 2010.

Dr. Xiaofeng Song

Mr. Deheng Li