Vol. 93
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2020-06-18
Fast Direction-Finding Algorithm by Partial Spatial Smoothing in Sparse MIMO Radar
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 93, 127-136, 2020
Abstract
For reducing the computational complexity of direction-finding algorithm in sparse multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar, a low-complexity partial spatial smoothing (PSS) algorithm is presented to estimate the directions of multiple targets. Firstly, by dealing with a partly continuous sampling covariance vector in PSS technology, an incomplete signal subspace can be obtained. Then, a special matrix can be obtained by using this incomplete signal subspace. Meanwhile the incomplete signal subspace can also be repaired by the special matrix. At last, the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) algorithm is used to obtain direction estimations. In the process of obtaining signal subspace, no eigenvalue decomposition (EVD) needs to be performed. Compared with the traditional spatial smoothing (SS) technology, the proposed algorithm has lower computational complexity and higher estimation precision. Many simulation results are provided to support the proposed scheme.
Citation
Sheng Liu, Feng Qin, Jing Zhao, Weizhi Xiong, and Ziqing Yuan, "Fast Direction-Finding Algorithm by Partial Spatial Smoothing in Sparse MIMO Radar," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 93, 127-136, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20031701
References

1. Liu, S., J. Zhao, and W. Li, "Subspace extension algorithm for joint DOA and DOD estimation in bistatic MIMO radar," International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Security, 244-252, Springer, Cham, 2019.

2. Xia, T. Q., "Joint diagonalization based DOD and DOA estimation for bistatic MIMO radar," Signal Processing, Vol. 108, 159-166, 2015.

3. Zheng, G. M. and B. X. Chen, "Unitary dual-resolution ESPRIT for joint DOD and DOA estimation in bistatic MIMO radar," Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 26, No. 1, 159-178, 2015.

4. Qi, H., H. Jiang, and S. Yao, "Joint multi-target DOD and DOA estimation in bistatic MIMO radar exploiting 2-level nested arrays," International Conference on Radar Systems (Radar 2017), 1-4, IET, Belfast, UK, 2017.

5. Zheng, Z. and J. Zhang, "Fast method for multi-target localisation in bistatic MIMO radar," Electronics Letters, Vol. 47, 138-139, 2011.

6. Gao, H., J. Li, and M. Diao, "Direction finding of bistatic MIMO radar based onquantum-inspired grey wolf optimization in the impulse noise," EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 2018, 1-14, 2018.

7. Xie, R., Z. Liu, and Z. J. Zhang, "DOA estimation for monostatic MIMO radar using Polynomial root," Signal Processing, Vol. 90, No. 12, 3284-3288, 2010.

8. Zhang, X. and D. Xu, "Low-complexity ESPRIT-based DOA estimation for collocated MIMO radar," Electronic Letters, Vol. 47, No. 4, 283-284, 2011.

9. Zhang, X., Y. Huang, C. Chen, and D. Xu, "Reduced-complexity Capon for direction of arrival estimation in a monostatic multiple-input multiple-output radar," IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation, Vol. 6, No. 8, 796-801, 2012.

10. Li, J. F., X. F. Zhang, W. Y. Chen, and T. Hu, "Reduced-Dimensional ESPRIT for direction finding in monostatic MIMO radar with double parallel uniform linear arrays," Wireless Personal Communication, Vol. 77, No. 1, 1-19, 2014.

11. Wang, W., X. P. Wang, H. G. Song, and Y. H. Ma, "Conjugate ESPRIT for DOA estimation in monostatic MIMO radar," Signal Processing, Vol. 93, No. 7, 2070-2075, 2013.

12. Shi, J., G. Hu, X. Zhang, and Y. Xiao, "Symmetric sum coarray based co-prime MIMO configuration for direction of arrival estimation," AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, Vol. 94, 339-347, 2018.

13. Shi, J., G. Hu, and X. Zhang, "Generalized co-prime MIMO radar for DOA estimation with enhanced degrees of freedom ," IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1203-1212, 2018.

14. Vaidyanathan, P. P. and P. Pal, "Sparse sensing with co-prime samplers and arrays," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 59, No. 2, 573-586, 2011.

15. Pal, P. and P. P. Vaidyanathan, "Coprime sampling and the MUSIC algorithm," Proceedings of Digital Signal Processing Workshop and IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop (DSP/SPE), 289-294, Sedona, AZ, USA, 2011.

16. Pal, P. and P. P. Vaidyanathan, "Nested arrays: A novel approach to array processing with enhanced degrees of freedom," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 58, No. 8, 4167-4181, 2010.

17. Yang, M., L. Sun, X. Yuan, and B. Chen, "Improved nested array with hole-free DCA and more degrees of freedom," Electronics Letters, Vol. 52, No. 25, 2068-2070, 2016.

18. Liu, S., Q. Liu, J. Zhao, and Z. Yuan, "Triple two-level nested array with improved degrees of freedom," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B,, Vol. 84, 135-151, 2019.

19. Yang, M., L. Sun, X. Yuan, and B. Chen, "A new nested MIMO array with increased degrees of freedom and hole-free difference coarray," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 25, No. 1, 40-44, 2018.

20. Liu, Q., B. Wang, X. Li, J. Tian, T. Cheng, and S. Liu, "An optimizing nested MIMO array with hole-free 322 difference coarray," MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 232, 01055, EDP Sciences, 2018.

21. Gu, J. F., P. Wei, and H. M. Tai, "2-D direction-of-arrival estimation of coherent signals using cross-correlation matrix," Signal Processing, Vol. 88, 75-85, 2008.

22. Schmidt, R. O., "Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation," IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation, Vol. 34, No. 3, 276-280, 1986.

23. Richard, R. and T. Kailath, "ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques," IEEE Trans. Acous, Speech, and Signal Process., Vol. 37, No. 7, 984-995, 1989.

24. Marcos, S., Marsal, and A. Benidir, "The propagator method for source bearing estimation," Signal Processing, Vol. 42, No. 2, 121-138, 1995.

25. Nie, X. and L. P. Li, "A computationally efficient subspace algorithm for 2-D DOA estimation with L-shaped array," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 21, No. 8, 971-974, 2014.