Vol. 104
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2021-09-17
Focalized Brain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with the Utilization of a Field Shaper and a Crescent Ferromagnetic Core
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 185-197, 2021
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been widely used in the treatment of varied physical and neuropsychiatric disorders, especially in major depression. The intracranial electromagnetic field is generated by the the time-varying current in the stimulation coil to change the potential of targeted neurons during the treatment. Since different mental disorders correspond to specific stimulation targets and broad stimulation range might raise serious side effects, stimulation focalization is very important in TMS. To achieve focalized stimulation, a novel magnetic stimulation coil with the field shaper and the crescent ferromagnetic core (the FSMC coil) is proposed and optimized in this study. The Finite-Element Method (FEM) is adopted to analyze the relationships between the design parameters of the field shaper and crescent ferromagnetic core and the characteristics of the intracranial electromagnetic field. Compared to traditional single circular coil, the focalization of the intracranial electromagnetic field generated by the optimized FSMC coil can be significantly improved both from 2D and 3D levels. To verify our method, an anatomically realistic human head model with different electrical properties assigned to each tissue of the brain is employed in this paper. We also checked the maximum induced charge density on the targeted plane generated by the optimized coil to make sure that it will not cause any induced neurologic damage.
Citation
Xiao Fang Wei Liu Yaoyao Luo Chang Liu Zhou He , "Focalized Brain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with the Utilization of a Field Shaper and a Crescent Ferromagnetic Core," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 185-197, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21061808
http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pier.php?paper=21061808
References

1. Hand, B. J., et al., "TMS coil orientation and muscle activation influence lower limb intracortical excitability," Brain Research, Vol. 1746, 147027, 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147027

2. Sanchez, C. C., et al., "Design of TMS coils with reduced Lorentz forces: Application to concurrent TMS-fMRI," Journal of Neural Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, 016056.1-016056.11, 2020.

3. Peterchev, A. V., et al., "Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection, and reporting practices," Brain Stimulation, Vol. 5, No. 4, 435-453, 2012.
doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.001

4. Yi, G., et al., "Dynamic analysis of Hodgkin's three classes of neurons exposed to extremely low-frequency sinusoidal induced E-field," Applied Mathematics & Computation, Vol. 231, 100-110, 2014.
doi:10.1016/j.amc.2013.12.181

5. Dou, Z. and J. Liao, "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technique Foundamental Theory and Clinical Practice," People's Health Publishing House, 2012.

6. Chail, A., et al., "Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A review of its evolution and current applications," Industrial Psychiatry Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2018.

7. Gordon, S. R., et al., "Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: A pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial," Journal of Pain Research, Vol. 11, 1209, 2018.

8. Tang, A., et al., "Low intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation drives structural synaptic plasticity in the young and aged motor cortex,", 2021.

9. Huang, H., "Magnetic stimulation of neurons and study of membrane structures,", State University of New York at Buffalo, 2013.

10. Pfeiffer, F. and A. Benali, "Could non-invasive brain-stimulation prevent neuronal degeneration upon ion channel re-distribution and ion accumulation after demyelination?," Neural Regeneration Research, Vol. 15, No. 11, 1977-1980, 2020.
doi:10.4103/1673-5374.282234

11. Kato, T., et al., "Electromagnetic characteristics of eccentric figure-eight coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A numerical study," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 111, No. 7, Pt. 2, 22-1988, 2012.

12. Meng, Y., et al., "Deep brain transcranial magnetic stimulation using variable ``Halo coil'' system," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 117, No. 17, 1106-128, 2015.
doi:10.1063/1.4913937

13. Guadagnin, V., et al., "Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation: Modeling of different coil configurations," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 7, 1543-1550, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2015.2498646

14. Lu, M. and S. Ueno, "Calculating the E-field in real human head by transcranial magnetic stimulation with shield plate," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 105, No. 7, 527, 2009.
doi:10.1063/1.3093912

15. Barker, A. T., R. I. Jalinous, and I. L. Freeston, "Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex," Lancet, Vol. 325, No. 8437, 1106-1107, 1985.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4

16. Yang, S., et al., "Circular coil array model for transcranial magnetic stimulation," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 20, 829-833, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TASC.2010.2040379

17. Hsu, K.-H. and D. M. Durand, "A 3-D differential coil design for localized magnetic stimulation," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 10, 1162-1168, 2001.
doi:10.1109/10.951519

18. Kim, D. H., G. E. Georghiou, and C. Won, "Improved field localization in transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain with the utilization of a conductive shield plate in the stimulator," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 4, 720-725, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.870244

19. Xiong, H., J. H. Shi, X.-W. Hu, and J.-Z. Liu, "The focusing optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation system," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 48, 145-154, 2016.
doi:10.2528/PIERM16040509

20. Sorkhabi, M. M., K. Wendt, and T. Denison, "Temporally interfering TMS: Focal and dynamic stimulation location," 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) in Conjunction with the 43rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society, IEEE, 2020.

21. Lindl, A., et al., "A 3-axis coil design for multichannel TMS arrays," Neuro Image, 224, 2020.

22. Lee, E. G., et al., "Investigational effect of brain-scalp distance on the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 52, No. 7, 1-4, 2016.

23. Chiu, T.-J., et al., "Osteopontin expression is associated with the poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy," BioMed Research International, Vol. 2018, 1-9, 2018.

24. Deng, Z. D., S. H. Lisanby, and A. V. Peterchev, "E-field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs," Brain Stimulation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1-13, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.02.005

25. Roth, B. J., et al., "The heating of metal electrodes during rapid-rate magnetic stimulation: A possible safety hazard," Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 85, No. 2, 116-123, 1992.
doi:10.1016/0168-5597(92)90077-O

26. Liu, C., et al., "Optimal design of transcranial magnetic stimulation thin core coil with trade-off between stimulation effect and heat energy," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2020.

27. Saxby, P., et al., "A water-cooled transcranial magnetic stimulation coil," Brain Stimulation, 2008.