volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

In standard measurement methods such as NSA 94-106, the low-frequency magnetic shielding effectiveness of a shielding enclosure is tested using the near field of loop antenna. Under this near-field configuration, there is no analytical or closed-form solution for volumetric shielding like box/cavity except for planar shielding like a sheet of infinite extension. Exploring the correlation between volumetric shielding and planar shielding can provide simple prediction methods for volumetric shielding based on planar shielding. As a taste to this end, this article explores the difference between the shielding effectiveness of a double-sheet cavity and a single sheet under the NSA 94-106 standard. We derived the exact solution in integral form for electromagnetic fields inside the cavity and calculated the curves of shielding effectiveness on the frequency with different sheet material, thickness, and sheet-to-sheet distance. The results show that when the distance from the receiving antenna to the back sheet is greater than the diameter of the loop antenna, the results of a double-sheet cavity tend to be consistent with a single-sheet configuration. When the distance is less than the diameter, the difference between the two depends on material type and sheet thickness.

1. Zhou, Y., L. Zhang, and S. Xiu, "Design and analysis of platform shielding for wireless charging tram," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 129443-129451, 2019.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939197 Google Scholar

2. Lee, S., D. H. Kim, Y. Cho, et al. "Low leakage electromagnetic field level and high efficiency using a novel hybrid loop-array design for wireless high power transfer system," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 66, No. 6, 4356-4367, Jul. 2018.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2018.2851988 Google Scholar

3. Mohammad, M., E. T. Wodajo, S. Choi, et al. "Modeling and design of passive shield to limit EMF emission and to minimize shield loss in unipolar wireless charging system for EV," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 34, No. 12, 12235-12245, 2019.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2019.2903788 Google Scholar

4. Mou, W. and M. Lu, "Research on shielding and electromagnetic exposure safety of an electric vehicle wireless charging coil," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 117, 55-72, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERC21072701 Google Scholar

5. Kellogg, J., "Navigating the selection of magnetic resonance imaging shielding systems," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 3, No. 1, 43-46, 2021. Google Scholar

6. Collier, L., et al. "Magnetic field diffusion in medium-walled conductors," IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 47 , No. 1, 1024-1031, 2019.
doi:10.1109/TPS.2018.2881453 Google Scholar

7. Giaccone, L., V. Cirimele, and A. Canova, "Mitigation solutions for the magnetic field produced by MFDC spot welding guns," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 62, No. 1, 83-92, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2018.2877805 Google Scholar

8. Celozzi, S., R. Araneo, and G. Lovat, Electromagnetic Shielding: Theory and Applications, 2nd Edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023.

9. Tesche, F. M., M. V. Ianoz, and T. Karlsson, EMC Analysis Methods and Computational Models, Wiley-Interscience Press, New York, 1996.

10. Lee, K. S. H. and G. Bedrosian, "Diffusive electromagnetic penetration into metallic enclosures," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 27, No. 2, 194-198, 1979.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1979.1142064 Google Scholar

11. "Specification for Shielded Enclosures," Specification NSA, 94-106, 1994. Google Scholar

12. "IEEE Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shielding Enclosures," IEEE Standard 299-2006, 2007. Google Scholar

13. Moser, J. R., "Low-frequency shielding of a circular loop electromagnetic field source," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 9, No. 1, 6-18, 1967.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1967.4307447 Google Scholar

14. Qin, D. and C. Jiao, "Low-frequency magnetic shielding of planar screens: effects of loop radius and loop-to-loop distance," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 64, No. 2, 367-377, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2021.3118543 Google Scholar

15. Andrieu, G., J. Panh, A. Reineix, et al. "Homogenization of composite panels from a nearfield magnetic shielding effectiveness measurement," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 54, No. 3, 700-703, Jun. 2012.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2012.2186455 Google Scholar

16. Lovat, G., P. Burghignoli, R. Araneo, and S. Celozzi, "Magnetic shielding of planar metallic screens: A new analytical closed-form solution," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 62, No. 5, 1884-1888, Oct. 2020.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2019.2952401 Google Scholar

17. Ryan, C. M., "Computer expression for predicting shielding effectiveness for the low-frequency plane shield case," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 9, No. 2, 83-94, 1967.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1967.4307468 Google Scholar

18. Jiao, C., F. Ning, X. Yang, et al. "Low-frequency magnetic shielding of planar shields: A unified wave impedance formula for the transmission line analogy," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 63, No. 4, 1046-1057, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2021.3052779 Google Scholar

19. Matsuzawa, S., T. Kojima, K. Mizuno, et al. "Electromagnetic simulation of low-frequency magnetic shielding of a welded steel plate," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 63, No. 6, 1896-1903, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2021.3087187 Google Scholar

20. Zhang, Z., X. Yang, C. Jiao, et al. "Analytical model for low-frequency magnetic field penetration through a circular aperture on a perfect electric conductor plate," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 63, No. 5, 2599-1604, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2021.3065064 Google Scholar

21. Sun, Z., W. Dong, D. Y. Qin, et al. "Approximate simulation of low-frequency magnetic shielding of a rectangular shielding box with all walls perforated periodical holes," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 117, 55-72, 2021. Google Scholar

22. Lovat, G., P. Burghignoli, R. Araneo, et al. "Shielding of an imperfect metallic thin circular disk: Exact and low-frequency analytical solution," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 167, 1-10, Jan. 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIER19090908 Google Scholar

23. "Comsol software," [Online] Available: https://www.comsol.asia/comsol-multiphysics.

Dr. Fubin Pang

Dr. Shi Chen

Dr. Jianfei Ji

Dr. Yiyi Jing

Dr. Sijia Liu

Professor Chongqing Jiao