Vol. 110
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 116 [2026] PIERB 115 [2025] PIERB 114 [2025] PIERB 113 [2025] PIERB 112 [2025] PIERB 111 [2025] PIERB 110 [2025] PIERB 109 [2024] PIERB 108 [2024] PIERB 107 [2024] PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2025-02-05
Multi-Objective Optimization Design of a Bilayer Segmented Asymmetric Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 110, 131-148, 2025
Abstract
This paper proposes a bilayer segmented asymmetric V-type magnetic structure of interior permanent magnet motor to address the problems of large air-gap magnetic density zero region, high air-gap magnetic density distortion rate, and large output torque ripple in the traditional V-type permanent magnet synchronous motor. Firstly, the superiority of the bilayer segmented asymmetric V-type structure is verified using finite element simulation compared with the bilayer conventional V-type and bilayer segmented symmetric V-type structures. Secondly the analytical model of the air-gap magnetic density, output torque, and torque ripple is established. Then, with the optimization objectives of reducing the air-gap magnetic density distortion rate, increasing the output torque, and reducing the torque ripple, and with pole-span angles of the bilayer segmented asymmetric V-type structure as the optimization variables, each optimization variable is subjected to weighted sensitivity stratification. The response surface optimization is applied to the low and medium-level sensitivity optimization variables, while a Pareto frontier distribution is used to obtain the set of the effective values of the high-level sensitivity optimization variables. The optional combination of the pole-span angles of the segmented asymmetric V-type structure is objectively selected by applying the TOPSIS method. Finally, the effectiveness of the optimized design is verified by finite element simulation and prototype tests. The results show that the bilayer segmented asymmetric V-type structure can reduce the percentage of the zero region of the air-gap from 4.82% to 3.91%, which is reduced by 18.8% and lower the air-gap magnetic density distortion rate from 0.263 to 0.226, which is reduced by 14.1% while ensuring good output characteristics with improving the average output torque from 14.842 N.m to 16.418 N.m, which is increased by 10.6%, and reducing the torque ripple from 0.169 to 0.156, which is reduced by 7.7%.
Citation
Luyao Wang, Hui Zhu, Yunpeng Song, Wenjing Hu, Huihui Geng, Xueyi Zhang, Qi Yu, Xin Zhou, and Xingxu Jin, "Multi-Objective Optimization Design of a Bilayer Segmented Asymmetric Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 110, 131-148, 2025.
doi:10.2528/PIERB24110102
References

1. Cheng, Ming, Peng Han, and Wei Hua, "General airgap field modulation theory for electrical machines," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 64, No. 8, 6063-6074, Aug. 2017.

2. Son, Ji-Chang, Ji-Yeon Kim, Jae-Wan Choi, Dong-Kuk Lim, and Han-Kyeol Yeo, "Performance enhancement of the IPMSM for HEV applications using grain-oriented electrical steel and design optimization," IEEE Access, Vol. 10, 46599-46607, 2022.

3. Zhang, Xueyi, Qinjun Du, Shilun Ma, Huihui Geng, Wenjing Hu, Zhiwu Li, and Guoqiang Liu, "Permeance analysis and calculation of the double-radial rare-earth permanent magnet voltage-stabilizing generation device," IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 23939-23947, 2018.

4. Liang, Jianwei, Dabin Liu, Yun Gao, Hongwei Yuan, and Xiping Liu, "Design and analysis of a novel mechanical variable flux interior permanent magnet synchronous motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 123, 167-179, 2022.

5. Ghadamyari, Mohammad Adib, Mehdi Moallem, and Babak Fahimi, "Improving the torque characteristics of interior PM synchronous motor using an asymmetric on-off method on the rotor surface," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 54, 55-65, 2017.

6. Kim, Hyunwoo, Yeji Park, Seung-Taek Oh, Chang-Sung Jin, Ju Lee, and Won-Ho Kim, "Study on the design of six-phase surface inset permanent magnet synchronous generator and motor considering the power factor and torque ripple," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1-5, Feb. 2022.

7. Qu, Guangyu, Ying Fan, and Qiushuo Chen, "Suppression of torque ripple in a new consequent-pole permanent magnet machine by segmented structure," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 58, No. 8, 1-6, Aug. 2022.

8. Wang, Shaopeng, Youhua Wang, Chengcheng Liu, Gang Lei, Jianguo Zhu, and Youguang Guo, "Detent force minimization of a tubular flux-switching permanent magnet motor using un-equal width stator slots based on Taguchi method," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1-5, Jun. 2020.

9. Ma, Pengcheng, Qian Wang, Yong Li, Shanlin Jiang, and Meng Zhao, "Research on torque ripple suppression of the slotted limited angle torque motor," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1-6, Feb. 2021.

10. Hu, Pengfei, Dong Wang, et al. "Sinusoidal optimization model for air gap magnetic field of eccentric magnetic pole permanent magnet motor," Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, Vol. 34, No. 18, 3759-3768, Sep. 2019.

11. Qi, Xiaodong, Fengyang Gao, et al. "Optimal design of new eccentric magnet pole for surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous motors," Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 34, No. 8, 93-100, Aug. 2020.

12. XU, Yinglei, Qunzhan Li, and Tao Wang, "Optimal design of no-load airgap flux density of permanent magnet synchronous motor," Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, Vol. 22, No. 4, 513-516, 2009.

13. Ma, Pengcheng, Qian Wang, Yong Li, Shanlin Jiang, and Meng Zhao, "Research on torque ripple suppression of the slotted limited angle torque motor," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1-6, Feb. 2021.

14. Park, Jin-Cheol, Jae-Hyun Kim, Soo-Hwan Park, K.-O. Kim, Moo-Hyun Sung, and Myung-Seop Lim, "Design optimization using asymmetric rotor in IPMSM for torque ripple reduction considering forward and reverse directions," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 59, No. 11, 1-5, Nov. 2023.

15. Ren, Wu, Qiang Xu, Qiong Li, and Libing Zhou, "Reduction of cogging torque and torque ripple in interior PM machines with asymmetrical V-type rotor design," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 52, No. 7, 1-5, Jul. 2016.

16. Xiao, Yang, Z. Q. Zhu, Geraint W. Jewell, Jintao T. Chen, Di Wu, and Liming M. Gong, "A novel asymmetric interior permanent magnet synchronous machine," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 58, No. 3, 3370-3382, 2022.

17. Muhammad, Niaz, Faisal Khan, Basharat Ullah, and Baheej Alghamdi, "Performance analysis and design optimization of asymmetric interior permanent magnet synchronous machine for electric vehicles applications," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 18, No. 4, 425-435, 2024.

18. Ge, Yongsheng, Hui Yang, Weijia Wang, Heyun Lin, and Ya Li, "A novel interior permanent magnet machine with magnet axis shifted effect for electric vehicle applications," World Electric Vehicle Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, 189, 2021.

19. Ding, Fukang, Liwei Shi, et al. "Hybrid algorithm optimization design of segmented permanent magnet synchronous motor," Machine Tool & Hydraulics, Vol. 51, No. 4, 23-29, 2023.

20. Liu, Wei, Hui Yang, Heyun Lin, Fei Peng, Shukang Lyu, and Xin Huang, "Thermal modeling and analysis of hybrid-magnetic-circuit variable flux memory machine," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 59, No. 2, 1307-1318, Mar.-Apr. 2023.

21. Li, Shiqi, Wenming Tong, Mingjun Hou, Shengnan Wu, and Renyuan Tang, "Analytical model for no-load electromagnetic performance prediction of V-shape IPM motors considering nonlinearity of magnetic bridges," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 37, No. 2, 901-911, Jun. 2022.